• Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150–161.
• Arbona, C. (2000). The development of academic achievement in school aged children: Precursors to career development. In Lent, R. & Brown. S. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 270-309). New York: John Wiley.
• Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269–298.
• Balakrishnan, B. & Low, F. S. (2016). Learning Experience and Socio-Cultural Influences on Female Engineering Students’ Perspectives on Engineering Courses and Careers. Minerva, 54(2), 219- 239.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 248-287.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001), Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206.
• Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.
• Bong, M. (2004). Classroom culture as a source for the mismatch between Korean students’ performance and motivation. East West Education, 21, 1-18.
• Bong, M., Kim, H., Shin, J. H., Lee, S., & Lee, H. (2008). Exploration of socio-cultural factors affecting Korean adolescents’ motivation. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 14(1), 319-348.
• Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple-choice tests. Science Education, 90(2), 253–269.
• Britner, S. L. (2008), Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970.
• Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Chang, Y. (2014). Science Motivation Across Asian Countries: Links among Future-Oriented Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Task Values, and Achievement Outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 247–258.
• Dabney, K., P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-School Time Science Activities and Their Association with Career Interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. 2(1).
• DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability level. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245–254.
• de Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 332–344.
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
• DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011). High aspirations but low progression: The science aspirations-careers paradox amongst minority ethnic students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 243–271.
• De Volder, M. L., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitivemotivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
• Domene, J., Socholotiuk, K., & Woitowicz, L. A. (2011). Academic motivation in post-secondary students. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(1), 99-127.
• Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 ⅹ 2 Achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
• Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and Gender Differences in Children's Self- and Task Perceptions during Elementary School. Child Development, 64(3), 830– 847.
• Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088–1107.
• Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146.
• Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176.
• Ha, M., & Lee, J. K., (2012). Exploring variables related to students' understanding of the convergence of basic and applied science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 320-220.
• Hirschi, A. (2010). Positive adolescent career development: The role of intrinsic and extrinsic work values. Career Development Quarterly, 58(3), 276-287.
• Ho, E. S. C. (2009). Characteristics of East Asian Learners: What We Learned from PISA. Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 327.
• Huang, G. H. C & Gove, M. (2015). Confucianism, Chines families, and academic achievement: Exploring how Confucianism and Asian descendant parenting practices influence children’s academic achievement. In Khine, M. S. (Ed.), Science Education in East Asia (pp. 41-66). Retrieved fromhttp://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319163895
• Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113-125.
• Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002), Changes in Children’s SelfCompetence and Values: Gender and Domain Differences across Grades One through Twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
• Jerrim, J. (2015). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Westernborn children of East Asian descent. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3), 310–333.
• Keith, T. Z. (1993). Causal influences on school learning. In: H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Analytic methods for educational productivity (pp. 21–47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99 – 121.
• Kim, S., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Private Tutoring and Demand for Education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 259-296.
• Kjærnsli, M., & Lie, S. (2011). Students’ preference for science careers: International comparisons based on PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 121–144.
• Lam, C. C., Ho, E. S. C., & Wong, N. Y. (2002). Parents’ beliefs and practices in education in confucian heritage cultures: The Hong Kong case. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 3(1), 99-114.
• Lee, J. K. (2006). Educational fever and South Korean higher education. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Educativa, 8 (1). Retrieved May 29, 2016 from: http://redie.uabc.mx/vol8no1/contents-lee2.html
• Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2013), Science Interests in Preschool Boys and Girls: Relations to Later Self-Concept and Science Achievement. Science Education, 97(4), 574–593.
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36-49.
• Leung, F. K. S. (2001) In search of an east Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
• Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian Model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587–611.
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Boston College.
• Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351−373.
• Meece, J. L. & Jones, M. G. (1996), Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science: Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 393–406.
• Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 9–33.
• Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381.
• Ministry of Education. (1997). The school curriculum of the Republic of Korea. Retrieved from http://ncic.kice.re.kr/english.kri.org.inventoryList.do#
• Ministry of Education. (2015a). 2015 Plan for Ministry of Education. Retrieved fromhttp://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Korea%20R/Korea_R_Major_Policies_and_Pl ans_for_2015.pdf
• Ministry of Education. (2015b). The 2015 Revised Science Curriculum (Report No. 2015-74). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
• Ministry of Education Science and Technology. (2011). The 2009 Revised Science Curriculum (Report No. 2009-41). Seoul: Ministry of Education Science and Technology.
• Ministry of Education & Korean Educational Development Institute. (2014). Brief Statistics on Korean Education. Seoul, Korea.
• Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S. & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting Long-Term Growth in Students' Mathematics Achievement: The Unique Contributions of Motivation and Cognitive Strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475–1490.
• Myeong, J. O., & Crawley, F. E. (1993), Predicting and understanding Korean high school students' science-track choice: Testing the theory of reasoned action by structural equation modeling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 381–400.
• Nauta, M. M., Kahn, J. H., Angell, J. W., & Cantarelli, E. A. (2002). Identifying the antecedent in the relation between career interests and self-efficacy: Is is one, the other, or both? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(3), 290-301.
• Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch based analyses of a nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1373–1405.
• Orthner, D. K., Akos, P., Rose, R., Jones-Sanpei, H., Mercado, M., & Woolley, M. E. (2010). CareerStart: A Middle School Student Engagement and Academic Achievement Program. Children Schools, 32(4), 223-234.
• Pajars, F. (2007). Culturealizing educational psychology. In Farideh, S. & Rumjahn, H. (Eds.), Culture, Motivation and Learning (pp. 19-42). Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/Pajares2007Culturalizing.pdf
• Park, H. (2008). Test of Group invariance for the structural model among motivation, self-concept and student achievement: Using PISA 2006 data. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(3), 43-67.
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.
• Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
• Schneider, B., & Lee, Y. (1990). A model for academic success: The school and home environment of East Asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21(4), 358-377.
• Schunk, D.H., Pintrich, P.R., & Meece, J.L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Seth, M. J. (2002). Education fever: society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
• Shin, J., Lee, H., McCarthy-Donovan, A., Hwang, H., Yim, S., & Seo, E. (2015). Home and Motivational Factors Related to Science-Career Pursuit: Gender differences and gender similarities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(9), 1478-1503.
• Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn! The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 343–60.
• Simpkins, S. D., Price, C. D. & Garcia, K. (2015), Parental support and high school students' motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among latino and caucasian boys and girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1386–1407.
• Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129- 136.
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eliks, I. (2013) The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1- 34.
• Sweet, R., Nissinen, K., & Vuorinen, R. (2014). An analysis of the career development items in PISA 2012 and of their relationship to the characteristics of countries, schools, students and families. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. ELGPN Research Paper, No. 1. Retrieved from http://www.elgpn.eu/publications/browse-by-language/english/elgpn-research-paper-no.- 1-pisa/
• Sweet, S. N., Fortier, M. S., Strachan, S. M., & Blanchard, C. M. (2012). Testing and integrating selfdetermination theory and self-efficacy theory in a physical activity context. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 53(4), 319–327.
• Tabachnick, S. E., Miller, R. B., & Relyea, G. E. (2008). The relationships among students’ futureoriented goals and subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and task-oriented self-regulation strategies in an academic environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 629–642.
• Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V, & Fan, X. (2006). Career choice. Planning early for careers in science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 312(5777), 1143–1144.
• Tan, E., Barton, A. C., Kang, H., & O’Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143-1179.
• Tracey, T. J. G. (2002). Development of interests and competency beliefs: A 1-year longitudinal study of fifth- to eighth-grade students using the ICA–R and structural equation modeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 148–163.
• Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012), Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A followup study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057–1095.
• Walberg, H. J., & Tsai, S. L. (1983). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 359-373.
• Wang, M.-T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not Lack of Ability but More Choice: Individual and Gender Differences in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775.
• Wang, T. L., & Berlin, D. (2010). Construction and validation of an instrument to measure Taiwanese elementary students’ attitudes toward their science class. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2413-2428.
• Wang, X. (2013). Why Students Choose STEM Majors: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121.
• Woolley, M. E., Rose, R. a., Orthner, D. K., Akos, P. T., & Jones-Sanpei, H. (2013). Advancing Academic Achievement Through Career Relevance in the Middle Grades: A Longitudinal Evaluation of CareerStart. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1309–1335.
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch. Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
• Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1189–1212.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.

APA

Shin, S., Lee, J.-K., & Ha, M. (2017). Influence of Career Motivation on Science Learning in Korean High-School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a

Vancouver

Shin S, Lee JK, Ha M. Influence of Career Motivation on Science Learning in Korean High-School Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(5):1517-38. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a

AMA

Shin S, Lee JK, Ha M. Influence of Career Motivation on Science Learning in Korean High-School Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(5), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a

Chicago

Shin, Sein, Jun-Ki Lee, and Minsu Ha. "Influence of Career Motivation on Science Learning in Korean High-School Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 5 (2017): 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a

Harvard

Shin, S., Lee, J.-K., and Ha, M. (2017). Influence of Career Motivation on Science Learning in Korean High-School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), pp. 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a

MLA

Shin, Sein et al. "Influence of Career Motivation on Science Learning in Korean High-School Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 5, 2017, pp. 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a