• Bauminger, N., Shulman, C., & Agam, G. (2003). Peer interaction and loneliness in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(5), 489-507.
• Becker-Cottrill, B., McFarland, J., & Anderson, V. (2003). A Model of Positive Behavioral Support for Individuals with Autism and Their Families The Family Focus Process. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(2), 113-123.
• Boondee, V., Kidrakarn, P., & Sa-Ngiamvibool, W. (2011). A learning and teaching model using projectbased learning (PBL) on the web to promote cooperative learning. European Journal of Social Sciences, 21(3), 498-506.
• Chang, C. S., Liu, E. Z. F., Sung, H. Y., Lin, C. H., Chen, N. S., & Cheng, S. S. (2014). Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in education and teaching international, 51(4), 366-377.
• Chen, S. Y., Chang, Y. J., & Ko, H. W. (2011). The Influence of Parental Education Level, Parental Reading Attitude, and Current Home Reading Activities on Students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(S), 357-376.
• Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52(2), 283-291.
• Cano-Garcia, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430.
• Huang, M. S., Hsiao, W. H., Chang, T. S., & Hu, M. H. (2012). Design and Implementation of a Cooperative Learning System for Digital Content Design Curriculum: Investigation on Learning Effectiveness and Social Presence. Turkish Online Journal of Educational TechnologyTOJET, 11(4), 94-107.
• Li, J. W., Wang, Y. T., & Chang, Y. C. (2013). A learning-community recommendation approach for webbased cooperative learning. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 7(3), 19-24.
• Ko, H. W. (1999). Reading comprehension screening test. Psychological Testing, 46(2), 1-11.
• Ko, H. W., & Chan, Y. L. (2002). Elementary school (grades two to six) Reading Comprehension screening tests Manual. National Central UniversityTaiwan.
• Liao, Y. W., Huang, Y. M., Chen, H. C., & Huang, S. H. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of collaborative learning performance over social networking sites in a ubiquitous learning context. Computers in Human Behaviour, 43, 313-323.
• Lin, Y. C. (1999). The thinking styles of Hualien elementary school students and the variables in stylistic development. Unpublished Master Dissertation, National Hualien Teachers College, Taiwan.
• Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Alternatives to instructor assessment: A case study of comparing self and peer assessment with instructor assessment under a networked innovative assessment procedures. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 395.
• Palonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Patterns of interaction in computer supported learning: a social network analysis. In Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 334-339.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1991). MSG Thinking Styles Inventory: Manual, Unpublished Test, Yale University, New Havan, CT.
• Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Constantinou, C. P. (2016). A study of students' heuristics and strategy patterns in web-based reciprocal peer assessment for science learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 12-22.
• Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the group embedded figures test. Palo Alto, California.
• Wu, Y. Y. (1987). A study of cognitive ability and cognitive patterns of individual differences phenomenon. Educational Review, 7, 51-98.
• Yousef, A. M. F., Wahid, U., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2015). The Effect of Peer Assessment Rubrics on Learners' Satisfaction and Performance within a Blended MOOC Environment. In Proc. CSEDU 2015 conference, 2, 148-159.
• Yu, F. Y., & Sung, S. (2015). A mixed methods approach to the assessor's targeting behavior during online peer assessment: effects of anonymity and underlying reasons. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18.
• Yu, F. Y., Wu, C. P., & Hung, C. C. (2014). Are there any joint effects of online student question generation and cooperative learning? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 367-378.

APA

Lee, C. I., & Chang, C. C. (2017). Using the Networked Peer Support Strategy to Enhance Reading Comprehension for Students with Various Thinking Styles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1501-1515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00682a

Vancouver

Lee CI, Chang CC. Using the Networked Peer Support Strategy to Enhance Reading Comprehension for Students with Various Thinking Styles. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(5):1501-15. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00682a

AMA

Lee CI, Chang CC. Using the Networked Peer Support Strategy to Enhance Reading Comprehension for Students with Various Thinking Styles. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(5), 1501-1515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00682a

Chicago

Lee, Chien I, and Chih Chieh Chang. "Using the Networked Peer Support Strategy to Enhance Reading Comprehension for Students with Various Thinking Styles". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 5 (2017): 1501-1515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00682a

Harvard

Lee, C. I., and Chang, C. C. (2017). Using the Networked Peer Support Strategy to Enhance Reading Comprehension for Students with Various Thinking Styles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), pp. 1501-1515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00682a

MLA

Lee, Chien I et al. "Using the Networked Peer Support Strategy to Enhance Reading Comprehension for Students with Various Thinking Styles". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 5, 2017, pp. 1501-1515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00682a