Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts

Eirini Tzovla; Katerina Kedraka; Christos Kaltsidis

doi:10.29333/ejmste/9729

Full Text (PDF)

Eirini Tzovla ¹ ^* , Katerina Kedraka ¹, Christos Kaltsidis ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Laboratory of Teaching and Professional Development of Bioscientists, GREECE^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper reports on a study exploring the in-service elementary school teachers satisfaction as far as the design and implementation of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC), which took place during the second wave of pandemic COVID-19 and prepared in-service elementary school teachers how to teach biological concepts in Primary School with the utilization of digital educational content and Open Educational Recourses (OER). A total of 251 teachers enrolled in this MOOC of whom 142 completed the course and were asked to fill-in a questionnaire. The findings indicated that the majority of the participants were satisfied both with the specific learning experience and the participation in a learning community in which interaction, support and active participation were developed. Recommendations are made for future research.

Keywords

biological concepts
digital educational content
in-service elementary school teachers
MOOC
satisfaction

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2021, Volume 17, Issue 3, Article No: em1946

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729

Publication date: 25 Feb 2021

Article Views: 2170

Article Downloads: 1056

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Anderson, T. (2004). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33-60). Athabasca University.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Baran, E., & Alzoubi, D. (2020). Human-centered design as a frame for transition to remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 365-372. Retrieved on 5 December 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216077
Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age (2nd Ed.). Vancouver, B.C.: Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Blank, R. K., de las Alas, N., & Smith, C. (2008). Does Teacher Professional Development Have Effects on Teaching and Learning? Evaluation Findings from Pro-grams in 14 States. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
Castaño-Muñoz, J., Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., & Punie, Y. (2018). Who is taking MOOCs for teachers’ professional development on the use of ICT? A crosssectional study from Spain. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1528997
Cho, M. H., & Rathbun, G. (2013). Implementing teacher-centred online teacher professional development (oTPD) programme in higher education: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.760868
Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. The International Journal for innovation and quality in learning, 2(3), 65-77.
Dalton, E., Grant, K. & Perez, L. (2014). SOOC: A New Model for Online Professional Learning Communities Focus: Universal Design for Learning. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 454-462). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved on 20 January 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/149010
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. London, UK: Sage.
Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Topaz, B. (2018). Massive open online courses as a knowledge base for teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(5), 608-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1516350
Eriksson, T., Adawi, T., & Stohr, C. (2017). Time is the bottleneck: a qualitative study exploring why learners drop out of MOOCs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9127-8
European Commission (2014). Report on Web Skills Survey: Support Services to Foster Web Talent in Europe by Encouraging the use of MOOCs Focused on web Talent—First Interim Report. https://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/sites/default/files/news/MOOCs-for-webskills-survey-report.pdf
European Commission (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027. Resetting education and training for the digital age. Brussels.
Fisher, J. B., Schumaker, J. B., Culbertson, J., & Deshler, D. D. (2010). Effects of a computerized professional development program on teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110369556
Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B. W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., & Edelson, D. C. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113494413
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition. Sage. London.
Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi delta kappan, 90(7), 495-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000709
Håklev, S., & Slotta, J. D. (2017). A Principled Approach to the Design of Collaborative MOOC Curricula. In C. Delgado Kloos, P. Jermann, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, D. Seaton, & S. White (Eds.), Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus. EMOOCs 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10254. Springer, Cham.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 358-389. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Herbert, S., & Rainford, M. (2014). Developing a model for continuous professional development by action research. Professional development in education, 40(2), 243-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.794748
Hilli, C. (2018). Distance teaching in small rural Primary Schools: A participatory action research project. Educational Action Research, 28(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1526695
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 16(3), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Kedraka, K. (2008). Supporting the professional development of teachers in a school unit: principles, prerequisites and suggestions. Ta Ekpaideutika, 87-88, 111-124. [in Greek]
Kennedy, E., & Laurillard, D. (2019). The potential of MOOCs for large-scale teacher professional development in contexts of mass displacement. London Review of Education, 17(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.2.04
Koukis, N., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2017). Designing MOOCs for teacher professional development: Analysis of participants’ engagement. In A. Mesquita & P. Peres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL 2017 (pp. 271-280). Porto: ACPI.
Koukis, N. & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). MOOCS for teacher professional development: exploring teachers’ perceptions and achievements. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(1), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0081
Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1), 29369. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369
Lavidas, K., Dalapa, M., Dimitriadi, S., Athanassopoulos, S., (2019). Four Job Satisfaction’s dimensions of secondary education teachers: An Exploratory Factor Analysis based on a Greek sample. Preschool & Primary Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.20412
Lavidas, K., & Gialamas, V. (2019). Adaption and psychometric properties of the short forms Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale with a sample of Greek university students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(8), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3552531
Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551222
Ngeze, L. V., & Sridhar, I. (2019). Online Teacher Professional Development in ICT Integration in Tanzania: An Experience Report. In J. L. Shih, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computers in Education. Taiwan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Powell, D. R., Diamond, K. E., Burchinal, M. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). Effects of an early literacy professional development intervention on head start teachers and children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017763
Prestridge, S. (2013). Reflective blogging as part of ICT professional development to support pedagogical change. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n2.4
Prestridge, S. (2016). Conceptualising self-generating online teacher professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1167113
Prestridge, S., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Exploring elements that support teachers’ engagement in online professional development. Education Sciences, 5(3), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030199
Rahimi, E., Henze, I., Hermans, F., & Barendsen, E. (2018). Investigating the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Teachers Attending a MOOC on Scratch Programming. In S. Pozdniakov, & V. Dagienė (Eds.), Informatics in Schools. Fundamentals of Computer Science and Software Engineering. ISSEP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11169 (pp. 180-193). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02750-6_14
Shah, V. G., Banerjee, G., Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2018). Learner-Centric MOOC for Teachers on Effective ICT Integration: Perceptions and Experiences. 2018 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2018.00023
Shangying, Y., & Jing, S. (2017). Learning to Learn from MOOCs from Teachers’ Perspective: Data Analysis Based on the Course “Micro-Class Design and Production”. International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Osaka (pp. 1-4). https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.9
Stenman, S., & Pettersson, F. (2020). Remote teaching for equal and inclusive education in rural areas? An analysis of teachers’ perspectives on remote teaching. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2019-0096
Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904800014003001
Tzovla, E., & Kedraka, K. (2020a). Teaching Biology in Primary Education. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 8(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.82.91.97
Tzovla, E., & Kedraka, K. (2020b). Personal biology teaching efficacy beliefs and biology teaching outcome expectancy of in-service elementary teachers. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(10), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3286
van Aalderen‐Smeets, S. I., & van der Molen, J. H. (2015). Improving Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science by attitude‐focused professional development. Journal of research in science teaching, 52(5), 710-734. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21218
Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). #TwitterforTeachers: The implications of Twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K-12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925694
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
Yoo, J. H. (2016). The effect of professional development on teacher efficacy and teachers’ self-analysis of their efficacy change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0007

How to cite this article

APA

Tzovla, E., Kedraka, K., & Kaltsidis, C. (2021). Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), em1946. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729

Vancouver

Tzovla E, Kedraka K, Kaltsidis C. Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(3):em1946. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729

AMA

Tzovla E, Kedraka K, Kaltsidis C. Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(3), em1946. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729

Chicago

Tzovla, Eirini, Katerina Kedraka, and Christos Kaltsidis. "Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 3 (2021): em1946. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729

Harvard

Tzovla, E., Kedraka, K., and Kaltsidis, C. (2021). Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), em1946. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729

MLA

Tzovla, Eirini et al. "Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 3, 2021, em1946. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729