Learning Mechanism and Function Characteristics of MOOC in the Process of Higher Education

Shujun Tang

doi:10.12973/ejmste/80769

Full Text (PDF)

Shujun Tang ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ School of Marxism, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, 330022, CHINA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

At present, the practice development of massive open online Courses (MOOC) is prior to the theoretical research about MOOC in academic circles. Through document analysis, participant observation and case analysis of MOOC, we find that the connotation of MOOC is mainly annotated from three dimensions: curriculum form, education model and knowledge innovation. According to the learning theory and teaching practice of MOOC, the teaching mode of MOOC is divided into three kinds: MOOC based on content, MOOC based on network and MOOC based on task. Compared with the traditional courses, MOOC has intrinsic characteristics such as large scale, openness, networking, personalized and participation, which includes the online learning effectiveness, the mastery learning, the interactive cooperation and the learning mechanism of complex system self-organization core. Through the analysis of MOOC learning mechanism, goal, characteristics and advantages, according to the investigation on the use of MOOC at home and abroad, combined with the characteristics of computing discipline, the two aspects of MOOC teaching function: one is to use the learning records on MOOC to study pedagogy, and create new educational theory; another is to use MOOC for the flipped classroom.

Keywords

higher education
MOOC
learning mechanism
function characteristics

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2017, Volume 13, Issue 12, 8067-8072

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80769

Publication date: 24 Nov 2017

Article Views: 9377

Article Downloads: 2895

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ballou, D., & Springer, M.G. (2017). Has nclb encouraged educational triage? Accountability and the distribution of achievement gains. Education Finance and Policy, 12(1), 77-106. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00189.
Bu, Y. Y. (2015). On the Construction and Implementation of Specialty Teaching Resources Database for Vocational Education Oriented towards SPOC. Vocational and Technical Education, 25(11), 12-15.
Bulger, M., Bright, J., & Cobo, C. (2015). The real component of virtual learning: motivations for face-to-face MOOC meetings in developing and industrialised countries. Information Communication & Society, 18(10), 1200-1216.
Dai, L. L., & Li, Q. (2015). MOOC: the Leverage Pivot of Higher Educational Reform in China. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 25(3), 23-26.
Ding, L., Kim, C., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 126-142. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.016.
Ezen-Can, A., Boyer, K. E., Kellogg, S., & Booth, S. (2015). Unsupervised modeling for understanding MOOC discussion forums: a learning analytics approach. International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM, 15(4), 146-150.
Giddens, D. (2016). To MOOC or not to MOOC: how can online learning help to build the future of higher education (Chandos information professional series). Australian Library Journal, 65(2), 142-143.
Guterman, O. (2017). What makes a social encounter meaningful: the impact of social encounters of homeschooled children on emotional and behavioral problems? Education and Urban Society, 49(8), 778-792. doi:10.1177/0013124516677009.
Hao, Q., Barnes, B., Wright, E., & Branch, R. M. (2017). The influence of achievement goals on online help seeking of computer science students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1273-1283. doi:10.1111/bjet.12499.
Hardy, M., & Totman, S. (2017). Teaching an old game new tricks: Long-term feedback on a re-designed online role play. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1260-1272. doi:10.1111/bjet.12498.
Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91(12), 83-91.
John, M., Molepo, J. M., & Chirwa, M. (2017). South african learners’ conceptual understanding about image formation by lenses. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1723-1736. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00694a.
Kinkead-Clark, Z. (2017). Bridging the gap between home and school perceptions of classroom teachers and principals: case studies of two jamaican inner-city schools. Education and Urban Society, 49(8), 762-777. doi:10.1177/0013124516658951.
Koedinger, K. R., Kim, J., Jia, J. Z., McLaughlin, E. A., & Bier, N. L. (2015). Learning is Not a Spectator Sport: Doing is Better than Watching for Learning from a MOOC. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S ‘15). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 111-120. doi:10.1145/2724660.2724681.
Lai, P.K., Portolese, A., & Jacobson, M. J. (2017). Does sequence matter? Productive failure and designing online authentic learning for process engineering. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1217-1227. doi:10.1111/bjet.12492.
Li, S. X. (2017). A Study on the Strategy of integrating Knowledge Resources in Uniersity Students Education. Computer Simulation, 34(7), 162-165.
Liu, Z. L. (2017). Teaching reform of business statistics in college and university. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6901–6907. doi:10.12973/ejmste/78537.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K., & Williams, S. A. (2015). Who are with us: MOOC learners on a Future Learn course? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 557–569.
Luo, N., Zhang, M. L., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115, 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006.
Mackness, J., Bell, F., & Funes, M. (2016). The Rhizome: A Problematic Metaphor for Teaching and Learning in a MOOC. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(14), 89-95.
Mayer, C. (2017). Written forms of signed languages: a route to literacy for deaf learners? American Annals of the Deaf, 161(5), 552-559.
McLean, K., Edwards, S., & Morris, H. (2017). Community playgroup social media and parental learning about young children’s play. Computers & Education, 115, 201-210. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.004.
Paredes, V. (2017). Grading system and student effort. Education Finance and Policy, 12(1), 107-128. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00195.
Parks-Stamm, E. J., Zafonte, M., & Palenque, S. M. (2017). The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1250-1259. doi:10.1111/bjet.12512.
Scott, K. M., Baur, L., & Barrett, J. (2017). Evidence-based principles for using technology-enhanced learning in the continuing professional development of health professionals. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 37(1), 61-66. doi:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000146.
Si, L.B., & Qiao, H. Y. (2017). Performance of financial expenditure in china’s basic science and math education: panel data analysis based on ccr model and bbc model. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5217–5224. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00995a.
Taggart, A. (2017). The role of cultural discontinuity in the academic outcomes of latina/o high school students. Education and Urban Society, 49(8), 731-761. doi:10.1177/0013124516658522.
Wang, A. Q. (2015). The Nature and Consciousness of the Combination of theory and Practice of Education. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 12(5), 1-4.
Wang, Q., Li, J. H., Zhang, B. H., et al. (2017). Effect analysis of action experiential mental health education for Uniersity Students. Chinese Journal of School Health, 38(8), 45-63.
Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 114(8), 274-285.
Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an Animal Behavior and Welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96(5), 83-93.
Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Penserini, L., & Poelmans, S. (2016). Designing an MOOC as an agent-platform aggregating heterogeneous virtual learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16(7), 1-18.

How to cite this article

APA

Tang, S. (2017). Learning Mechanism and Function Characteristics of MOOC in the Process of Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(12), 8067-8072. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80769

Vancouver

Tang S. Learning Mechanism and Function Characteristics of MOOC in the Process of Higher Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(12):8067-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80769

AMA

Tang S. Learning Mechanism and Function Characteristics of MOOC in the Process of Higher Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(12), 8067-8072. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80769

Chicago

Tang, Shujun. "Learning Mechanism and Function Characteristics of MOOC in the Process of Higher Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 12 (2017): 8067-8072. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80769

Harvard

Tang, S. (2017). Learning Mechanism and Function Characteristics of MOOC in the Process of Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(12), pp. 8067-8072. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80769

MLA

Tang, Shujun "Learning Mechanism and Function Characteristics of MOOC in the Process of Higher Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 12, 2017, pp. 8067-8072. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80769