• Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and Learning Revisited. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
• Benckert, S., Pettersson, S., Aasa, S., Johansson, O. & Norman, R. (2005). Gruppdiskussioner runt kontextrika problem i fysik – Hur ska problemen utformas? [Group discussions around context-rich problems in physics – How is the problemsbest formulated?] NorDina nr 2, 36-50. (In Swedish)
• Booth, K.M. & James, B.W. (2001). Interactive learning in a higher education Level 1 mechanics module. International Journal of Science Education 23(9), 955-967.
• Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
• DiSessa, A.A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
• Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P. & Jonsson, G. (2007) From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context-rich problems during introductory physics work at university. Research in Science Education. Published online 11 January 2007.
• Gautreau, R. & Novembsky, L. (1997). Concepts first – A small group approach to physics learning. American Journal of Physics, 65 (5), 418-428.
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64-74.
• Halloun, I. A. & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common-sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1056–1065.
• Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or P-Prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? The Journal of The Learning Sciences 5(2), 97-127.
• Heller P., Keith R. & Anderson S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60 (7), 627-636.
• Heller P. & Hollabaugh M (1992) Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60 (7), 637-644.
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–158.
• Hewson, P. (1982). A case study of conceptual change in special relativity: The influence of prior knowledge in learning. European Journal of Science Education, 4, 61-76.
• Huffman, D. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students‟ problem-solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (6), 551-570.
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college. Change, 30 (4), 26 – 35.
• Johnson, M. (2001). Facilitating high quality student practice in introductory physics. Phys. Educ. Res. American Journal of Physics Suppl. 69 (7), S2-S11.
• Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P. & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335–1342.
• Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education. Science & Education, 12, 91-113.
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Sience: Language, Learning and Values. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Leonard, W. J., Dufresne, R. J. & Mestre, J. P. (1996). Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. American Journal of Physics, 64(12), 1495–1503.
• Linder, C. J. (1993). University physics students' conceptualizations of factors affecting the speed of sound propagation. International Journal o. Science Education, 15 (6), 655-662.
• Maloney, D. P. (1994). Research on problem solving: Physics. In R. I. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. NewYork: Macmillan, 327–354.
• McDermott, L. C. & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 67 (9), 755-767.
• Mortimer, E. F. & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• Panse, S., Ramadas, J. & Kumar, A. (1994). Alternative conceptions in Galilean relativity: frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 16 (1), p 63-82.
• Posner G.J., Strike K.A., Hewson P.W. & Gertzog W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211-227.
• Samiullah, M. (1995). Effect of in-class student-student interaction on the learning of physics in a college physics course. American Journal of Physics 63(10), 944- 950.
• Scherr, R., Shaffer, P. & Vokos, S. (2001). Student understanding of time in special relativity: Simultaneity and reference frames. American Journal of Physics, 69 (7), S24-S35.
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E. & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research 69 (1), 21-51.
• Wittmann, M. C., Steinberg, R. C. & Redish, E. F. (2003). Understanding and affecting student reasoning about sound waves. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (8), 991-1013.

APA

Benckert, S., & Pettersson, S. (2008). Learning Physics in Small-Group Discussions – Three Examples. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75312

Vancouver

Benckert S, Pettersson S. Learning Physics in Small-Group Discussions – Three Examples. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(2):121-34. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75312

AMA

Benckert S, Pettersson S. Learning Physics in Small-Group Discussions – Three Examples. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75312

Chicago

Benckert, Sylvia, and Sune Pettersson. "Learning Physics in Small-Group Discussions – Three Examples". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2008 4 no. 2 (2008): 121-134. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75312

Harvard

Benckert, S., and Pettersson, S. (2008). Learning Physics in Small-Group Discussions – Three Examples. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(2), pp. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75312

MLA

Benckert, Sylvia et al. "Learning Physics in Small-Group Discussions – Three Examples". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75312