• Amador, J., & Weiland, I. (2015). What preservice teachers and knowledgeable others professionally notice during lesson study. The Teacher Educator, 50, 1-18.
• Amador, J., Weiland, I., & Hudson, R. (in press). Analyzing preservice mathematics teachers' professional noticing.
• Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51–73.
• Ball D., Sleep, L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5) 458-474.
• Carrier, S. (2011). Implementing and integrating effective teaching strategies including features of lesson study in an elementary science methods course. The Teacher Educator, 46, 145-160.
• Cavin, R. (2008). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teachers through microteaching lesson study. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 5214-5520). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Corcoran, D. (2011). Learning from lesson study: Power distribution in a community of practice. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp.251-268). New York: Springer.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47.
• Dirkin, G. R. (1983). Cognitive tunneling: Use of visual information under stress. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 191-198.
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64.
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, English: Polity.
• Fernández, M. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 351-362.
• Fernandez, M. L., & Zilliox, J. (2011). Investigating approaches to lesson study in prospective mathematics teacher education. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 85-102). New York: Springer.
• Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy in elementary mathematics: The nature of facilitative teaching (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teacher, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15(2), 273-289.
• Gumperz, J. (2003). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.) The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 215 – 228). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Hart, L., & Carriere, J. (2011). Developing the habits of mind for a successful lesson study community. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 27-38). New York: Springer.
• Heller, M. (2001). Discourse and interaction. In Schiffrin, Tannen, and Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 250-264). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
• Huang, R. & Li, Y. (2012). What matters most: A comparison of expert and novice teachers’ noticing of mathematics classroom events. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 420-432.
• Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169-202.
• Jacobs, V., Lamb, L, Philipp, R., & Schappelle, B. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp.97-116). New York: Routledge.
• Lewis, C. (2002). Does lesson study have a future in the United States? Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development, 2002, 1–23.
• Lewis, C. (2006). Lesson study in North America: Progress and challenges. In M. Matoba, K. Crawford, & M. Sarkar Arani (Eds.), Lesson study: International perspective on policy and practice. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
• Marble, S. T. (2006). Learning to teach through lesson study. Action in Teacher Education, 28(3), 86-96.
• Marble, S. (2007). Inquiring into teaching: Lesson study in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(6), 935-953.
• Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 35-50). New York: Routledge.
• Miller, K. (2011). Situation awareness in teaching: What educators can learn from video based research in other fields? In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 51-65). New York: Routledge.
• Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 1-12). New York: Springer.
• Murata, A., & Pothen, B. (2011). Lesson study in preservice elementary mathematics methods courses: Connecting emerging practice and understanding. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 103-116). New York: Springer.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Potari, D. (2011). Response to part II: Emerging issues from lesson study approaches in prospective mathematics teacher education. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 127-132). New York, NY: Springer.
• Rogers, R. (2004). An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Scherrer, J., & Stein, M. K. (2013). Effects of a coding intervention on what teachers learn to notice during whole-group discussion. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(2), 105-124.
• Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp.3-14). New York: Routledge.
• Sherin, M.G., & van Es, E.A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 475-491.
• Sims, L. & Walsh, D. (2009). Lesson Study with preservice teachers: Lessons from lessons, Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 724-733.
• Star, J. Lynch, K., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ abilities to attend to classroom features. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp, Mathematics teacher noticing (pp.117-133). New York: Routledge.
• Star, J, & Strickland, S. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107-125.
• van Es, E. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp.134-151). New York: Routledge.
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571-596.
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R.W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1): Problems of general psychology (N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Designs and methods (Fourth Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

APA

Carter, I. S. W., & Amador, J. (2015). Lexical and Indexical Conversational Components That Mediate Professional Noticing During Lesson Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1392a

Vancouver

Carter ISW, Amador J. Lexical and Indexical Conversational Components That Mediate Professional Noticing During Lesson Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(6):1339-61. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1392a

AMA

Carter ISW, Amador J. Lexical and Indexical Conversational Components That Mediate Professional Noticing During Lesson Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(6), 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1392a

Chicago

Carter, Ingrid S. Weiland, and Julie Amador. "Lexical and Indexical Conversational Components That Mediate Professional Noticing During Lesson Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 6 (2015): 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1392a

Harvard

Carter, I. S. W., and Amador, J. (2015). Lexical and Indexical Conversational Components That Mediate Professional Noticing During Lesson Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), pp. 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1392a

MLA

Carter, Ingrid S. Weiland et al. "Lexical and Indexical Conversational Components That Mediate Professional Noticing During Lesson Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 6, 2015, pp. 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1392a