• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Preservice and experienced biology teachers’global and specific subject matter structures: implications for conceptions of pedagogical content knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2(1).
• Adúriz-Bravo, A., Bonan, L., Galli, L. G., Chion, A. R., & Meinardi, E. (2005). Scientific argumentation in pre-service biology teacher education. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 1(1), 76-83.
• Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries (No. 41). http://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154.
• Anderson, W. A., Banerjee, U., Drennan, C. L., Elgin, S. C. R., Epstein, I. R., Handelsman, J., … Warner, I. M. (2011). Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities. Science, 331(6014), 152–153. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198280.
• Aydeniz, M., Baksa, K., & Skinner, J. (2011). Understanding the Impact of an Apprenticeship-Based Scientific Research Program on High School Students’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 403–421. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9261-4.
• Carrick, T. (1983). Some biology teachers’ goals for advanced level teaching. Journal of Biological Education, 17(3), 205-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1983.9654543.
• Chen, C.-Y., Pedersen, S., & Murphy, K. L. (2012). The influence of perceived information overload on student participation and knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication. Instructional Science, 40, 325–349. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9179-0.
• Eick, C. J. (2000). Inquiry, nature of science, and evolution: the need for a more complex pedagogical content knowledge in science teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 1–9.
• Fleischner, T. L., Espinoza, R. E., Gerrish, G. A., Greene, H. W., Kimmerer, R. W., Lacey, E. A., ... & Weisberg, S. (2017). Teaching Biology in the Field: Importance, Challenges, and Solutions. BioScience, 67(6), 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036.
• Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., … Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific Teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022.
• Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021.
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. http://doi.org/10.1002/.sce10106.
• Karpuk, N. V. (2008). Realizing the national-regional component of education in the structure of specialist training. The Journal of Secondary Vocational Education, 1, 42–43.
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
• Labov, J. B., Reid, A. H., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2010). Integrated Biology and Undergraduate Science Education: A New Biology Education for the Twenty-First Century? CBE Life Sciences Education, 9, 10–16. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-12-0092.
• Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001.
• Moore, A. (2012). Teaching and learning: Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. Routledge.
• Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944.
• Prahl, K. (2017). Best Practices for the Think-Pair-Share Active-Learning Technique. The American Biology Teacher, 79(1), 3-8. http://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2017.79.1.3.
• Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chudá, J. (2007). Slovakian Students’ Attitudes toward Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4).
• Romanovskaya, I. A. (2010). The structure of a future teacher’s research attitude. Modern High Technologies, 10, 127–131.
• Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276.
• Schallies, M., & Lembens, A. (2002). Student learning by research. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 13-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2002.9655840.
• Shihusa, H., & Keraro, F. N. (2009). Using Advance Organizers to Enhance Students’ Motivation in Learning Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4).
• Subramaniam, K. (2014). Student teachers’ conceptions of teaching biology. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 91-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837405.
• Thornton, S. J. (2001). Educating the Educators: Rethinking Subject Matter and Methods. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 72–78. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4001_11.
• Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: ready for take-off?. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1193556.
• Trushchenko, Ye. N. (2007). The major areas in organizing the independent work. The Journal of Secondary Vocational Education, 10, 26–28.
• UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. (2015). Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235406e.pdf#235440.
• Vikhoreva, O. A. (2009). High school students’ research activity in further education. The world of science, culture and education, 6, 122–124.
• Whitty, G. (2014). Recent developments in teacher training and their consequences for the ‘University Project’in education. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 466-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.933007.
• Wilson, A., Howitt, S., & Higgins, D. (2016). Assessing the unassessable: making learning visible in undergraduates’ experiences of scientific research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 901–916. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1050582.
• Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Shavelson, R. J., & Kuhn, C. (2015). The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(3), 393–411. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1004241.

APA

Cao, H., Amanbayeva, M. B., Maimatayeva, A. D., Unerbayeva, Z. O., Shalabayev, K. I., Sumatokhin, S. V., Imankulova, S. K., & Childibayev, J. B. (2017). Methodology of Research Activity Development in Preparing Future Teachers with the Use of Information Resources. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7399-7410. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79792

Vancouver

Cao H, Amanbayeva MB, Maimatayeva AD, Unerbayeva ZO, Shalabayev KI, Sumatokhin SV, et al. Methodology of Research Activity Development in Preparing Future Teachers with the Use of Information Resources. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(11):7399-410. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79792

AMA

Cao H, Amanbayeva MB, Maimatayeva AD, et al. Methodology of Research Activity Development in Preparing Future Teachers with the Use of Information Resources. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(11), 7399-7410. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79792

Chicago

Cao, Hui, Makhabbat B. Amanbayeva, Assiya D. Maimatayeva, Zulfiya O. Unerbayeva, Karatay I. Shalabayev, Sergey V. Sumatokhin, Sofya K. Imankulova, and Jumadil B. Childibayev. "Methodology of Research Activity Development in Preparing Future Teachers with the Use of Information Resources". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 11 (2017): 7399-7410. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79792

Harvard

Cao, H., Amanbayeva, M. B., Maimatayeva, A. D., Unerbayeva, Z. O., Shalabayev, K. I., Sumatokhin, S. V., . . . Childibayev, J. B. (2017). Methodology of Research Activity Development in Preparing Future Teachers with the Use of Information Resources. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), pp. 7399-7410. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79792

MLA

Cao, Hui et al. "Methodology of Research Activity Development in Preparing Future Teachers with the Use of Information Resources". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 11, 2017, pp. 7399-7410. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79792