Open Experimentation on Phenomena of Chemical Reactions via the Learning Company Approach in Early Secondary Chemistry Education

Katharina Beck; Torsten Witteck; Ingo Eilks

doi:10.12973/ejmste/75237

Full Text (PDF)

Katharina Beck ¹, Torsten Witteck ¹, Ingo Eilks ¹

More Detail

¹ University of Bremen, Bremen, GERMANY

Abstract

Presented is a case study on the implementation of open and inquiry-type experimentation in early German secondary chemistry education. The teaching strategy discussed follows the learning company approach. Originally adopted from vocational education, the learning company method is used to redirect lab-oriented classroom practice towards a more cooperative mode of learning and instruction. In our interpretation of this method for chemistry education, an additional methodological element was implemented in order to create an atmosphere allowing a different style of experimentation. Our interpretation of the learning company idea seeks to motivate students to perform self-regulated and self-organized experiments within the sought after cooperative mode. This paper describes an example using the phenomena of chemical reactions as developed within a project of Participatory Action Research. It also provides insight into both teacher and student feedback, concluding by relating our findings to other examples using the learning company approach in chemistry education.

Keywords

chemistry education
cooperative learning
open experimentation
learning company
Participatory Action Research

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2010 - Volume 6 Issue 3, pp. 163-171

Publication date: 21 Dec 2010

Article Views: 962

Article Downloads: 430

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Bates, G. R. (1978). The role of the laboratory in secondary school science programs. In M. B. Rowe (ed.), What research says to the science teacher (pp. 55-82). Washington: NSTA.
Beck, K., Witteck, T., & Eilks, I. (2009). Sabine Süß & Co – Eine Lernfirma rund um chemische Reaktionen des Zuckers für den Chemieanfangsunterricht [Sabine Sweet & Co – A learning company around chemical reactions of sugar for introudctory chemistry teaching]. RAABits Chemie Sekundarstufe I. I B/8, 1-12.
Blosser, P. E. (1983). What research says: The role of the laboratory in science teaching. School, Science and Mathematics 83, 165-169.
CEFIC (1999). www.cefic.be/activities/scienceedu/award/99/03.htm
Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. F., & Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Instructional consequences of students‟ knowledge about physical phenomena. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 61- 68). New York: Academic Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eilks, I. (2002). "Learning at Stations" in secondary level chemistry lessons. Science Education International, 13(1), 11-18.
Eilks, I. (2003). Co-operative curriculum development in a project of Participatory Action Research within chemical education: Teachers' reflections. Science Education International, 14 (4), 41-49.
Eilks, I. (2005). Experiences and reflections about teaching atomic structure in a jigsaw classroom in lower secondary school chemistry lessons. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 313-320.
Eilks, I. (ed.) (2007a), Chemie Interaktiv N [Chemistry Interactive N]. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Eilks, I. (2007b). From technical to emancipatory action research – A six year case study on science teachers involved in a cooperative curriculum development project. Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Malmoe, Sweden.
Eilks, I., & Ralle, B. (2002) Participatory Action Research within chemical education. in B. Ralle & I. Eilks (eds.), Research in chemical education - What does this mean? (pp. 87- 98). Aachen: Shaker.
Eylon, B., S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58, 251-301.
Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. HegartyHazel (ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159-182). London: Routledge.
Herrington, D. G., & Nakhleh, M. B. (2003). What defines effective chemistry laboratory instruction? Teaching assistant and student perspectives. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1197-1205.
Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 247-264.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201-217.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2007). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 601-627.
Lunetta, V. N. (1990). Cooperative learning in science, mathematics and computer problem solving. In M. Gardner, J. Greeno, F. Reif, A. Schoenfeld, A. Disessa & E. Stage (eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 235-249). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In: B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 249-268). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Miller L. S., Nakhleh, M. B., Nash, J. J., & Meyer, J. A. (2004). Students' attitudes toward and conceptual understanding of chemical instrumentation. Journal of Chemical Education 81, 1801-1808.
Nakleh, M. B., Polles, J., & Malina, K. (2002). Learning chemistry in a laboratory environment. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. S. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. H. Van Driel (eds.), Chemical Education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 69-94). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pätzold, G. & Lang, M. (1999): Lernkulturen im Wandel [Learning cultures in change]. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
Quin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65, 129-143.
Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. (1981). Inquiry related tasks in high school science laboratory handbooks. Science Education, 65, 477-484.
Tasker, R. (1981). Children‟s views and classroom experiences. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27, 33-37.
Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403-418.
Witteck, T., & Eilks, I. (2006). Max Sour Ltd. – Open experimentation and problem solving in a cooperative learning company. School Science Review, 88 (323), 95-102.
Witteck, T., Most, B., Kienast, S., & Eilks, I. (2007). A lesson plan on separating matter based on the learning company approach – A motivating frame for selfregulated and open lab-work in introductory chemistry lessons. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 108- 119.
Witteck, T., Most, B., Leerhoff, G., & Eilks, I. (2004). Cooperative learning on the internet using the ball bearing method (Inside-Outside-Circle). Science Education International, 15, 209-223.

How to cite this article

APA

Beck, K., Witteck, T., & Eilks, I. (2010). Open Experimentation on Phenomena of Chemical Reactions via the Learning Company Approach in Early Secondary Chemistry Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237

Vancouver

Beck K, Witteck T, Eilks I. Open Experimentation on Phenomena of Chemical Reactions via the Learning Company Approach in Early Secondary Chemistry Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(3):163-71. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237

AMA

Beck K, Witteck T, Eilks I. Open Experimentation on Phenomena of Chemical Reactions via the Learning Company Approach in Early Secondary Chemistry Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237

Chicago

Beck, Katharina, Torsten Witteck, and Ingo Eilks. "Open Experimentation on Phenomena of Chemical Reactions via the Learning Company Approach in Early Secondary Chemistry Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2010 6 no. 3 (2010): 163-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237

Harvard

Beck, K., Witteck, T., and Eilks, I. (2010). Open Experimentation on Phenomena of Chemical Reactions via the Learning Company Approach in Early Secondary Chemistry Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(3), pp. 163-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237

MLA

Beck, Katharina et al. "Open Experimentation on Phenomena of Chemical Reactions via the Learning Company Approach in Early Secondary Chemistry Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 6, no. 3, 2010, pp. 163-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237