Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Bauer, A. (2015). Cronbachs α im Kontext des Grundmodells der klassischen Testtheorie und darüber hinaus [Cronbach’s α in the context of the basic model of classical test theory and beyond] [PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München].
• Bauer, A., Gleichmann, J., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2025). Toward a more coherent and profession-related physics teacher education: Linking subject-specific and physics education content in the study entry phase. American Journal of Physics, 93(3), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0223735
• Bitzenbauer, P., Faletič, S., Michelini, M., Tóth, K., & Pospiech, G. (2024). Design and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess learners’ understanding of quantum measurement in different two-state con- texts: The context matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20, Article 020136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.020136
• Borges, L. F. M., Andreão, R. V., Schimidt, M. Q., Mestria, M., Dias, G. S., & Marques, C. (2024). Introduction to Gauss’s law in electromagnetism through a virtual reality application. In Proceedings of the 26^th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (pp. 128-133). https://doi.org/10.1145/3691573.3691577
• Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v7.i4.10
• Campos, E., Hernandez, E., Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2021). Phenomenographic analysis and comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric and magnetic fields and the principle of super- position. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, Article 020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020117
• Campos, E., Hernandez, E., Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2023). Analysis and comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of symmetry arguments in Gauss’s and ampere’s laws. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19, Article 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010103
• Campos, E., Troskot, P., Aschauer, W., & Hopf, M. (2025). Assessment of students’ understanding of electric and magnetic fields in high school. Physics Education, 60, Article 065038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae1345
• Durk, J., Davies, A., Hughes, R., & Jardine-Wright, L. (2020). Impact of an active learning physics work- shop on secondary school students’ self-efficacy and ability. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16, Article 020126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020126
• Edelsbrunner, P. A., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2025). The reliability, but not the Cronbach’s alpha, of knowledge tests matters: Response to Zitzmann and Orona (2025). Educational Psychology Review, 37, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10023-5
• Engelhardt, P. V. (2009). An introduction to classical test theory as applied to conceptual multiple-choice tests. Reviews in PER, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1119/RevPERv2.1.2
• Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813
• Guisasola, J., Almudí, J. M., Salinas, J., Zuza, K., & Ceberio, M. (2008). The Gauss and ampere laws: Different laws but similar difficulties for student learning. European Journal of Physics, 29, Article 1005. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/29/5/013
• Guo, B., & Yuan, Y. (2017). A comparative review of methods for comparing means using partially paired data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 26(3), 1323-1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280215577111
• Hahn, L., & Klein, P. (2022). Vektorielle Feldkonzepte verstehen durch Zeichnen? Erste Wirksamkeitsuntersuchungen [Understanding vector field concepts through drawing? Initial effectiveness studies]. PhyDid B-Didaktik der Physik-Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung, 1.
• Hahn, L., & Klein, P. (2023). The impact of multiple representations on students’ understanding of vector field concepts: Implementation of simulations and sketching activities into lecture-based recitations in undergraduate physics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012787
• Hahn, L., & Klein, P. (2025). The impact of multiple representations on students’ understanding of vector field concepts: Implementation of simulations and sketching activities into lecture-based recitations in undergraduate physics. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1544764
• Hernandez, E., Campos, E., Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2023). Students’ conceptual understanding of electric flux and magnetic circulation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19, Article 013102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.013102
• Hernandez, E., Campos, E., Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2025). Test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux: A reliable multiple-choice assessment tool. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21, Article 010156. https://doi.org/10.1103/98gy-2m6g
• Isvan, Z., & Singh, C. (2007). Improving student understanding of coulomb’s law and Gauss’s law. AIP Conference Proceedings, 883(1), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508722
• Jorion, N., Gane, B. D., James, K., Schroeder, L., DiBello, L. V., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2015). An analytic frame- work for evaluating the validity of concept inventory claims. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 454-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20104
• Kabashi, Q., Shabani, I., & Caka, N. (2022). Analysis of the student dropout rate at the faculty of electrical and computer engineering of the university of Prishtina, Kosovo, from 2001 to 2015. IEEE Access, 10, 68126-68137. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3185620
• Kämpf, L., & Stallmach, F. (2023). Erarbeitung eines spiralcurricularen Blended Learning Konzepts für die Mathematikausbildung der Studiengänge Lehramt Physik [Development of a spiral curriculum blended learning concept for mathematics education in physics teacher training programs]. PhyDid B-Didaktik der Physik-Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung. https://ojs.dpg-physik.de/index.php/phydid-b/article/view/1361
• Kämpf, L., & Stallmach, F. (2024a). Modulübergreifendes Blended Learning in der Mathematikausbildung zur Experimentalphysik im Lehramtsstudium Physik [Cross-module blended learning in mathematics education for experimental physics in physics teacher training programs]. PhyDid B-Didaktik der Physik-Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung. https://ojs.dpg-physik.de/index.php/phydid-b/article/view/1416
• Kämpf, L., & Stallmach, F. (2024b). Spiral-curricular blended learning for the mathematics education in physics teacher training courses. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1450607. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1450607
• Kämpf, L., Bauer, J. & Stallmach, F. (2025b). Materials of the MaMe seminars to mechanics and electro- dynamics. https://wbmoodle.uni-leipzig.de/course/view.php?id=2710
• Kämpf, L., Bauer, J., & Frank, S. (2025a). Spiral-curricular blended learning for the mathematical methods in physics education-A cross-modular interactive course. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1641893). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1641893
• LeBlanc, V., & Cox, M. (2017). Interpretation of the point-biserial correlation coefficient in the context of a school examination. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 13(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.13.1.p046
• Li, J., & Singh, C. (2017). Investigating and improving introductory physics students’ understanding of symmetry and Gauss’s law. European Journal of Physics, 39, Article 015702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa8d55
• Li, J., Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Helping students apply superposition principle in problems involving spherical, cylindrical, and planar charge distributions. American Journal of Physics, 91(8), 613-616. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0127127
• Lord, F. M. (1964). The effect of random guessing on test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24(4), 745-747. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446402400401
• Lumpe, M. (2019). Studienabbruch in den MINT-Fächern: Fallstudien an der Universität Potsdam und mögliche Folgerungen [Dropout rates in STEM subjects: Case studies at the University of Potsdam and possible conclusions]. In Alles auf Anfang! Befunde und Perspektiven zum Studieneingang (pp. 177-192).
• McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. part i: Investigation of student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60(11), 994-994. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17003
• Moodle Pty Ltd. (2025). Moodle–Open-source learning platform. Moodle. https://moodle.org
• Pepper, R. E., Chasteen, S. V., Pollock, S. J., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Our best juniors still struggle with Gauss’s law: Characterizing their difficulties. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1289(1), 245-248. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3515212
• Pospeschill, M. (2022). Testtheorie, Testkonstruktion, Testevaluation [Test theory, test construction, test evaluation]. UTB. https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838558332
• Rainson, S., Tranströmer, G., & Viennot, L. (1994). Students’ understanding of superposition of electric fields. American Journal of Physics, 62(11), 1026-1032. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17701
• Robbins, N. B., & Heiberger, R. M. (2011). Plotting Likert and other rating scales. In Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Statistical Meeting.
• Schild, N. (2021). Eignung von domänenspezifischen Studieneingangsvariablen als Prädiktoren für Studienerfolg im Fach und Lehramt Physik (volume 307) [Suitability of domain-specific study entry variables as predictors of study success in physics and teacher training (volume 307)]. Logos Verlag Berlin. https://doi.org/10.30819/5226
• Singh, C. (2006). Student understanding of symmetry and Gauss’s law of electricity. American Journal of Physics, 74(10), 923-936. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2238883
• Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541-542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
• Toggerson, B., Krishnamurthy, S., Hansen, E. E., & Church, C. (2020). Positive impacts on student self- efficacy from an introductory physics for life science course using the team-based learning pedagogy. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.07277
• Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. TRENDS in Sport Sciences, 1(21), 19-25.
• Universität Leipzig. (2018). Modulbeschreibungen Staatsexamen Höheres Lehramt an Gymnasien physik (stand: 03.05.2018) [Module descriptions for the state examination for higher secondary school teaching qualification in physics (as of: 03.05.2018)]. Universität Leipzig.
• Woitzik, A., Mecke, K., & Georg, D. (2023). Das Lehramtsstudium Physik in Deutschland [The teacher training program for physics in Germany]. Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft e.V.

APA

Kämpf, L., Bauer, J., & Stallmach, F. (2026). Physics teacher training students’ understanding of Gauss’s law of electricity by a blended learning course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(2), em2782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17908

Vancouver

Kämpf L, Bauer J, Stallmach F. Physics teacher training students’ understanding of Gauss’s law of electricity by a blended learning course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(2):em2782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17908

AMA

Kämpf L, Bauer J, Stallmach F. Physics teacher training students’ understanding of Gauss’s law of electricity by a blended learning course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(2), em2782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17908

Chicago

Kämpf, Lydia, Jan Bauer, and Frank Stallmach. "Physics teacher training students’ understanding of Gauss’s law of electricity by a blended learning course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 2 (2026): em2782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17908

Harvard

Kämpf, L., Bauer, J., and Stallmach, F. (2026). Physics teacher training students’ understanding of Gauss’s law of electricity by a blended learning course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(2), em2782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17908

MLA

Kämpf, Lydia et al. "Physics teacher training students’ understanding of Gauss’s law of electricity by a blended learning course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 2, 2026, em2782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17908