• Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. (2012). “Practical Work: its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (8), 1035-1055.
• Ackerson, V. L., Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of primary children‟s ideas in science on teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 363–385.
• Alibali, M. W., Stephens, A. C., Brown, A. N., Kao, Y. S., & Nathan, M. J. (2014). Middle School Students‟ Conceptual Understanding of Equations: Evidence from Writing Story Problems. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(3), 235-264.
• Attride-Sterling, J., (2001) Thematic Networks: an analytical tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), pp. 385-405. Sage Publications, London. Supplied by the British Library.
• Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Comparative Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality at University.
• Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
• Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment. Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57-66.
• Clackson, S. G., & Wright, D. K. (1992). An appraisal of practical work in science education. School Science Review, 74(266), pp. 39–42.
• Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), pp. 137–151.
• D‟Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning, Learning and Instruction, 29, 153-170.
• Dochy, J.R.C. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant of future learning. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Doran, R., Lawrenz, F & Hegelson, S. (1994). Research on assessment in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. (pp. 388-442).
• Duschl, R.A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), pp. 37–73.
• Hampton, J.A., & Moss, H.E. 2003. Concepts and meaning: Introduction to the special issue on conceptual presentation, Language and Cognitive processes, 18, (5/6), 505-512.
• Hickey, D.T. (2015). A situative response to the conundrum of formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2(2), 202-223.
• Hodson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work: Some considerations in philosophy of science, Science & Education (1), pp. 115-144.
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). „The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twentyfirst century‟. Science Education, 88, pp.28-54.
• Jagodzinski, P., & Wolski, R. (2015). Assessment of Application Technology of Natural User Interfaces in the Creation of a Virtual Chemical Laboratory. J Sci Educ Technol, (24), 16–28. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9517-5.
• Kaput, J. J., Blanton, M. L., & Moreno, L. (2008). Algebra from a symbolization point of view. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 19-55). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
• Lappi, O. (2012). „Qualitative, Quantitative and Experimental Concept Possession Criteria for Identifying Conceptual Change in Science Education‟. Science and Education, DOI 10.1007/s11191-012-9459-3
• Leont‟ev, A.N. (1982). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit, Studien zur Kritischen Psychlogie [Activity, Consciousness, Personality, Studies into Critical Psychology] Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein Verlag.
• Liu, C-J., Hou, I-L., Chiu, H-L, & Treagust, D.F. (2014). An exploration of secondary students‟ mental states when learning about Acids and Bases, Res Sci Educ (44), pp.133–154
• Lunetta, V., & Tamir, P. (1979). Matching lab activities with teaching goals, Science Teacher, 46(5), pp. 22-24.
• Lunetta, V., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. Lederman & S. Abel (Eds,), Handbook of research science education (pp. 393–441). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
• Millar, R. (1998). Students‟ understanding of procedures of scientific enquiry. In Tiberghien, A., Jossem, E.L., & Arojas, J. (Eds.). Connecting research in physics education with teacher education: An ICPE Book., http://.physics.ohio-state.edu/~jossem/ICPE/C$.html.
• Millar, R., Le Mare´chal, J.-F., & Tiberghien, A. (1999). „Mapping‟ the domain: Varieties of practical work. In J. Leach & A. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical work in science education—recent research studies, pp. 33–59. Roskilde/Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Roskilde University Press/Kluwer.
• Newton, P.E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment, Assessment in Education, 14(2), pp. 149–170
• Nickerson, R. S. (1985). Understanding understanding. American Journal of Education, 93(2), pp.201-239.
• Nicol, D. J. (1997) Research on learning and higher education teaching, UCoSDA Briefing Paper 45 (Sheffield, Universities and Colleges Staff Development Agency).
• Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
• Peacocke, C. (1992). A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Radford, L. (2013). Three Key Concepts of the Theory of Objectification: Knowledge, Knowing, and Learning, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 7-44.
• Reif, F. (2008). Applying cognitive science to education: Thinking and learning in scientific and other domains. The MIT Press.
• Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.
• Sam, C. (2012). Activity Theory and qualitative Research in Digital Domains. Theory into Practice, 51(20), 83-90.
• Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., & Almond, R. G. (2008). You can‟t fatten a hog by weighing it- or can you? Evaluating an assessment system for learning called ACED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Education 18, 289-316.
• Smith, E.L. (1991). A conceptual change model of learning science, In Glynn, S.M., Yeany, R.H. & Britton, B.K (Eds.). The psychology of learning science. London: Lawrence Associates Publishers.
• Tamir, P. (1996). Science assessment. In Bierenhaum et.al. (Eds.) Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning, processes and prior knowledge. Kluwer Academic publishers.
• Watkins, D., Dahlin, B., & Ekholm, M (2005). Awareness of the backwash effect of assessment: A phenomenographic study of the views of Hong Kong and Swedish lecturers, Instructional Science, (33), pp.283-309
• Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2014). Using formal embedded formative assessments aligned with a short-term learning progression to promote conceptual change and achievement in science, International journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531-552.

APA

Sedumedi, T. D. T. (2017). Practical Work Activities as a Method of Assessing Learning in Chemistry Teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1765-1784. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00697a

Vancouver

Sedumedi TDT. Practical Work Activities as a Method of Assessing Learning in Chemistry Teaching. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6):1765-84. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00697a

AMA

Sedumedi TDT. Practical Work Activities as a Method of Assessing Learning in Chemistry Teaching. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6), 1765-1784. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00697a

Chicago

Sedumedi, Thomas Dipogiso Tshipa. "Practical Work Activities as a Method of Assessing Learning in Chemistry Teaching". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 6 (2017): 1765-1784. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00697a

Harvard

Sedumedi, T. D. T. (2017). Practical Work Activities as a Method of Assessing Learning in Chemistry Teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), pp. 1765-1784. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00697a

MLA

Sedumedi, Thomas Dipogiso Tshipa "Practical Work Activities as a Method of Assessing Learning in Chemistry Teaching". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 6, 2017, pp. 1765-1784. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00697a