Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Bedford, S., & Legg, S. (2007). Formative peer and self-feedback as a catalyst for change within science teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90022D
• Biton, Y. (2024). Learning mathematics through peer assessment: “How can we assess something that we ourselves don’t know how to solve?” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), Article em2557. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15794
• Biton, Y. (2025). Student reflections on peer assessments: Benefits and challenges in a mathematics class. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, Article e2025003. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.3
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 9-25). SAGE.
• Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programs. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356215980030106
• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381064
• Davidson, G. V. (1990). Matching learning styles with teaching styles: Is it a useful concept in education? Performance and Instruction, 29(4), 36-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4160290410
• de-Armas-González, P., Perdomo-Díaz, J., & Sosa-Martín, D. (2023). Peer assessment processes in a problem-solving activity with future teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), Article em2245. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13057
• Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
• Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800950320212
• Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1985). Student-student interaction: Ignored but powerful. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718503600406
• Kerr, N., & Tindale, R. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009
• Kirkpatrick, D., & Fuller, R. (1995). The challenge of peer assessment. In L. Summers (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4^th Annual Teaching Learning Forum (pp. 146-149). Edith Cowan University.
• Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Commentary: Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20, 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
• Kruger, S. J. (2025). The reliability of peer assessment in a final-year information systems course. South African Journal of Higher Education, 39(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.20853/39-1-6740
• Leikin, R., & Zaslavsky, O. (1999). Connecting research with practice: Cooperative learning in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 92, 240-246. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.92.3.0240
• Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2016). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
• Li, L., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student-derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050025006
• Panadero, E. (2016). Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: A review and future directions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 302-318.
• Radford, L. (2011). Classroom interaction: Why is it good, really? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9271-4
• Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching, 8, 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr133oa
• Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000110102904
• Strachan, I. B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self-assessment of group work: Developing an effective response to increased enrollment in a third-year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20, 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269608709377
• Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2010). Guest editorial. Unraveling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
• Topping, K. J., Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
• van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
• Venables, A., & Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000103816
• Webb, N. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.22.5.0366
• Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
• Xiang, X., Yuan, R., & Yu, B. (2021). Implementing assessment as learning in the L2 writing classroom: A Chinese case. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 727-741. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1965539
• Yin, C., Chen, X., & Chang, Y. (2022). Peer assessment as a means to promote language proficiency: Evidence from classroom practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912568
• Zariski, A. (1996, February). Student peer assessment in tertiary education: Promise, perils, and practice. In J. Abbott, & L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Teaching and learning within and across disciplines (pp. 189-200). Proceedings of the 5^th Annual Teaching Learning Forum.
• Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Peer assessment of student constructed posters: Assessment alternatives in preservice mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011401532410

APA

Biton, Y. (2025). Predictive power of peer assessment: Correlations between evaluators’ scores and academic success in a mathematics preparatory program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(9), em2694. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16774

Vancouver

Biton Y. Predictive power of peer assessment: Correlations between evaluators’ scores and academic success in a mathematics preparatory program. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(9):em2694. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16774

AMA

Biton Y. Predictive power of peer assessment: Correlations between evaluators’ scores and academic success in a mathematics preparatory program. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(9), em2694. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16774

Chicago

Biton, Yaniv. "Predictive power of peer assessment: Correlations between evaluators’ scores and academic success in a mathematics preparatory program". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 9 (2025): em2694. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16774

Harvard

Biton, Y. (2025). Predictive power of peer assessment: Correlations between evaluators’ scores and academic success in a mathematics preparatory program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(9), em2694. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16774

MLA

Biton, Yaniv "Predictive power of peer assessment: Correlations between evaluators’ scores and academic success in a mathematics preparatory program". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 9, 2025, em2694. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16774