• Alaudan, R. (2015). Saudi student teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment (Doctoral thesis), University of York, York, England. Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/7648/
• Al-Dahmash, A. H., Mansour, N. S., Alshamrani, S. M., & Almohi, S. (2016). An analysis of activities in Saudi Arabian middle school science textbooks and workbooks for the inclusion of essential features of inquiry. Research in Science Education, 46(6), 879-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9485-7
• Alghamdi, A. (2013). Pedagogical Implications of Using Discussion Board to Improve Student Learning in Higher Education. Higher Education Studies, 3(5), 68-80.
• Alghamdi, Hamdan, A., & Al-Salouli, M. (2013). Saudi elementary school science teachers' beliefs about teaching science in the new millennium. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 501-525.
• Alhammad, K. (2015). A conceptual framework for re-shaping science education in Saudi Arabia. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (eds.), Science education in the Arab Gulf States: Cultural and historical perspectives on science education (pp. 121-136). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-049-9_6
• Al-Harbi, A. (2013). E-learning in the KSA: A taxonomy of learning methods in Saudi Arabia. (Master’s thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/310f/c65ebcf97acec439e3b7cd934d75482fb054.pdf
• Alrwathi, E., Almazroa, H., Alahmed, N., Scantbly, C., & Alshaye, F. (2014, December 4-7). Exploring curriculum implementation: Focus on science teaching. Paper presented at History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Asian Regional Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
• Al-Sadaawi, A. S. (2007). An investigation of performance-based assessment in science in Saudi primary schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://vuir.vu.edu.au/1497/
• Alshamrani, S. (2012). Priorities of research in science education in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Sciences and Islamic Studies, 24(1), 199-128.
• Al-Weher, M. (2004). The effect of a training course based on constructivism on student teachers’ perceptions of the teaching/learning process. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866042000248480
• Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 821-837. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<821::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-Y
• Avargil, S. (2019). Learning chemistry: Self-efficacy, chemical understanding, and graphing skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9765-x
• Aydarova, O. (2013). If not “The Best of the West,” then “Look East”: Imported teacher education curricula in the Arabian Gulf. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(3), 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315312453742
• Badri, M., Yang, G., Al Mazroui, K., Mohaidat, J., Al Rashedi, A., & Al Housani, N. (2017). Out-of-school experience categories influencing interest in biology of secondary school students by gender: Exploration on an Abu Dhabi sample. Journal of Biological Education, 51(2), 166-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1177576
• Bahgat, G. (1999). Education in the Gulf monarchies: Retrospect and prospect. International Review of Education, 45(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003610723356
• Barak, M. (2017). Science Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century: A Pedagogical Framework for Technology-Integrated Social Constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y
• Barthlow, M. J. (2011). The effectiveness of process oriented guided inquiry learning to reduce alternate conceptions in secondary chemistry (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58824070.pdf
• Barthlow, M. J., & Watson, S. B. (2014). The effectiveness of process-oriented guided-inquiry learning to reduce alternative conceptions in secondary chemistry. School Science & Mathematics, 114(5), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12076
• Berk, R. A. (1990). Importance of expert judgement in content-related validity evidence. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 12(5), 659-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599001200507
• Biklen, S., & Pollard, D. (2001). Feminist perspectives on gender in classrooms. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 723-747). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
• Boujaoude, S., & Gholam, G. (2014). The Middle East, Egypt, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia. In B. T. Vlaardingerbroek & N. Taylor (Eds.), Issues in upper secondary science education: Comparative perspectives (pp. 243-260). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275967_15
• Boz, Y., Yerdelen-Damar, S., & Belge-Can, H. (2018). Investigation of relations among middle school (junior high school) students’ gender, learning approaches, perceptions of learning environment and science achievement. Ilkogretim Online, 17(3), 1268-1282. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466342
• Brandriet, A. R., Xu, X., Bretza, S. L., & Lewis, J. E. (2011). Diagnosing changes in attitude in first-year college chemistry students with a shortened version of Bauer’s semantic differential. Chemical Education Research Practices, 12, 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90032C
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Brown, J. P. (2015). Anatomy and physiology: A guided inquiry. Ottawa, ON: Wiley.
• Bruner, J., & Haste, H. (1987). Making sense. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719
• Busch, H. (2005). Is science education relevant? Europhysics News, 36(5), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1051/epn:2005505
• Chase, A., Pakhira, D., & Stains, M. (2013). Implementing Process-Oriented, Guided-Inquiry Learning for the first time: Adaptations and short-term impacts on students’ attitude and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(4), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300181t
• Chionh, Y. H., & Fraser, B. J. (1998, April). Validation of the ‘What is Happening in This Class’ questionnaire. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
• Cobern, W. W. (1996). Constructivism and non-western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 4, 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180303
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830330104
• Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys’ and girls’ interests in science: Have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289660
• De Gale, S., & Boisselle, L. N. (2015). The effect of POGIL on academic performance and academic confidence. Social Science Education Journal, 26(1), 56-61. http://hdl.handle.net/2139/4004
• denBrok, P., Telli, S., Cakiroglu, J., Taconis, R., &Tekkaya, C. (2010). Learning environment profiles of Turkish secondary biology classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 13(3), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9076-5
• Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2005). Towards a framework of socio-linguistic analysis of science textbooks: The Greek case. Research in Science Education, 35, 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-8162-z
• Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R. S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., & White, H. B. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science: A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20204
• Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., Littlefield Cook, J., & Travers, J. (2000). Educational psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill College.
• Emilov, I., & Tafrova-Gergorova, A. (2016). A cross-national study of the learning environment in chemistry classes at Albanian, Kosovar, Romanian and Turkish secondary schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9591-4
• Fakayode, S. O. (2014). Guided-inquiry laboratory experiments in the analytical chemistry laboratory curriculum. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 406, 1267-1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7515-8
• Fraser, B, J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009932514731
• Freedman, M. P. (2002). The influence of laboratory instruction on science achievement and attitude toward science across gender differences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(2), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1615/JwomenMinorScienEng.v8.i2.50
• George R. (2000). Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009491500456
• Ghasemi, E., & Burley, H. (2019). Gender, affect, and math: A cross-national meta-analysis of trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2015 outcomes. Large Scale Assessments in Education, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0078-1
• G-Mrabet, J. (2012, February 23). Western education in the Arabian Gulf: The costs and benefits of reform [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.mei.edu/content/western-education-arabian-gulf-costs-and-benefits-reform
• Guo, C.-J. (2007). Issues in science learning: An international perspective. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 227-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hale, D., & Mullen, L. G. (2009). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities: A new innovation for marketing classes. Marketing Education Review, 19(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2009.11489063
• Hamdan, A. (2005). Women and education in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and achievements. International Education Journal, 6(1), 42-64.
• Hamdan, A. (2006). Arab women's education and gender perceptions: An insider analysis. Journal of International Women's Studies, 8(1), 52-64.
• Hanson, D. M. (2014). POGIL: Instructor’s guide to process-oriented guided-inquiry. Hampton, NH: Pacific Crest.
• Howe, C. (1997). Gender and classroom interaction: A research review. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
• Imel, S. (2000). Contextual learning in adult education: Practice application brief No. 12. ERIC Digest No. ED448304. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED448304
• International Association for Educational Advancement. (2019). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Retrieved from IEA website: https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/timss
• Jarvis T., & Pell A., (2004). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching, 42(1), 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20045
• Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, H. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X
• Jost, M. B. (1999). Theory into practice: Social constructivism and technology in instructional technology and teacher education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12202
• Kahveci, M. (2015a). Assessing high school students’ attitudes toward chemistry with a shortened semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research Practices, 16, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00186A
• Kahveci, M. (2015b). Majors’ gender-based affective states toward learning physical chemistry. In M. Kahveci & M. Orgill (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 297-318). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_15
• Kan, A., & Akbas A. (2006). Affective factors that influence chemistry achievement (attitude and self-efficacy) and the power of these factors to predict chemistry achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(1), 30-39. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.629.6460&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Kind P., Jones K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600909091
• Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Vision 2030. Retrieved from Vision 2030 website: https://vision2030.gov.sa/sites/default/files/report/Saudi_Vision2030_EN_2017.pdf
• Kousa, P., Kavonius, R., & Aksela, M. (2018). Low-achieving students’ attitudes towards learning chemistry and chemistry teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00226B
• Kurniawan, D. A., Darmaji, A., Putri, Y. E., Jannah, N., & Puspitasari, T. O. (2019). Perception and attitudes toward science: Condition of students in learning natural sciences in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 2293-2298. Retrieved from http://www.ijstr.org/final-print/oct2019/Perception-And-Attitudes-Toward-Science-Condition-Of-Students-In-Learning-Natural-Sciences-In-Indonesia.pdf
• Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2009). Australian English-language textbooks: The gender issues. Gender and Education, 21(4), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802392257
• Litvin, K. (2010). Understanding the cultural dimensions of Gulf Arab students. Doha, Qatar: Qatar University, Foundation Programme English Department.
• Mayr, A. (2015). Institutional discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Chiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2^nd ed.) (pp. 755-774). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch35
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
• Moog, R. S., Creegan, J. F., Hanson, M. D., Spencer, N. J., Straumanis, A., & Bunce, M. D. (2009). POGIL: Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning. In N. Pienta, M. M. Cooper, & T. J. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemists’ guide to effective teaching (Vol. 2) (pp. 90-101). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Ormerod, M., & Duckworth, D. (1975). Pupils’ attitudes to science. Slough, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.
• Osborne J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
• Papanastasiou, C., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2004). Major influences on attitudes toward science. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 239-257. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.3.239.30267
• Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17471.x
• Pickens, J. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions. In N. Borkowski (Ed.), Organizational behavior in health care (pp. 43-76). New York, NY: Jones & Barlett.
• Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
• Rahayu, S. (2015). Evaluating the affective dimension in chemistry education. In N. Kahveci & M. Orgill (Eds.), Affective domains in chemistry education (pp. 29-49). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_2
• Rummel, R. J. (1981). Understanding conflict and war, Volume 2. San Francisco, CA: Sage. Retrieved from https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/TCH.CHAP6.HTM
• Said, Z., Summers, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Wang, S. (2016) Attitudes toward science among grades 3 through 12 Arab students in Qatar: Findings from a cross-sectional national study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 621-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1156184
• Selim, M., & Shrigley, R. (1983). The group dynamics approach: A sociopsychological approach for testing the effect of discovery and expository teaching on the science achievement and attitude of young Egyptian students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200305
• Şen, Ş., Yılmaz, A., & Geban, Ö. (2015). The effects of process oriented guided inquiry learning environment on students’ self-regulated learning skills. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 66, 54-66. Retrieved from http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=1167872
• Şen, Ş., Yılmaz, A., & Geban, Ö. (2016). The effect of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) on 11th graders’ conceptual understanding of electrochemistry. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), Article 5. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v17_issue2/sen/index.htm#con
• Silfver, E. (2019). Gender performance in an out-of-school science context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9851-z
• Smith, L., & Abouammoh, A. (Eds.). (2013). Higher education in Saudi Arabia. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6321-0
• Spencer, J. N., & Moog, R. S. (2008). POGIL in the physical chemistry classroom. In R. S. Moog & J. N. Spencer (Eds.), Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (pp. 148-156). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0994.ch013
• Tranter, P., & Warn, J. (2008). Relationships between interest in motor racing and driver attitudes and behaviour amongst mature drivers: An Australian case study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1683-1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.003
• Treagust, D. F., Qureshi, S. S., Ojeil, J., Vishnumolakala, V. R., Mocerino, M., & Southan, D. C. (2018). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) as a culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: A perspective from grade 10 chemistry classes. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0
• Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6
• Valdez, J. E., & Bungihan, M. E. (2019). Problem-based learning approach enhances the problem solving skills in chemistry of high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 282-294. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.631
• Villagonzalo, E. C. (2014, March 6-8). Process-oriented guide-inquiry learning: An effective approach in enhancing students’ academic performance. In Proceedings of the DLSU Research Congress. Manila, Philippines.
• Walker, L., & Warfa, A. R. M. (2017). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL®) marginally effects student achievement measures but substantially increases the odds of passing a course. PLoS One, 12(10), Article No. e0186203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186203
• Whiteley, P. (2007). The ‘gender fairness’ of integrated science textbooks used in Jamaican high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 969-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180808
• Wiseman, A., & Al-Bakr, F. (2012). The elusiveness of teacher quality: A comparative analysis of teacher certification and student achievement in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Prospects, 43, 289-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9272-z
• Zgraggen, S. (2018). Comparing the Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) method to an Independently Developed Guided Inquiry Method (InDGIM) in a high school academic chemistry course (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.arcadia.edu/grad_etd/15/

APA

Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Alanazi, F. H. (2020). Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning in Saudi Secondary School Chemistry Instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1920. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9278

Vancouver

Alghamdi AKH, Alanazi FH. Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning in Saudi Secondary School Chemistry Instruction. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12):em1920. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9278

AMA

Alghamdi AKH, Alanazi FH. Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning in Saudi Secondary School Chemistry Instruction. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12), em1920. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9278

Chicago

Alghamdi, Amani Khalaf. H., and Fayadh Hamed Alanazi. "Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning in Saudi Secondary School Chemistry Instruction". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 12 (2020): em1920. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9278

Harvard

Alghamdi, A. K. H., and Alanazi, F. H. (2020). Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning in Saudi Secondary School Chemistry Instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1920. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9278

MLA

Alghamdi, Amani Khalaf. H. et al. "Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning in Saudi Secondary School Chemistry Instruction". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, 2020, em1920. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9278