Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• ABET. (2019). Computing accreditation commission criteria for accrediting computing programs 2019-2020. ABET. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/C001-19-20-CAC-Criteria-11-24-18.pdf
• Ackerman, R., Parush, A., Nassar, F., & Shtub, A. (2016). Metacognition and system usability: Incorporating metacognitive research paradigm into usability testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.041
• Akiri, E., Matathia Tor, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Teaching and assessment methods: STEM teachers’ perceptions and implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), Article em1969. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10882
• Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer.
• Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2022). Identifying metacognitive behavior in problem-posing processes: Development of a framework and a proof of concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 1381-1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39917-7_9
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
• Bruce, M. R. M., Bruce, A. E., Avargil, S., Amar, F. G., Wemyss, T. M., & Flood, V. J. (2016). Polymers and cross-linking: A CORE experiment to help students think on the submicroscopic level. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1599-1605. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00010
• Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Littlefair, G., & Joordens, M. (2013). Project-oriented design-based learning: Aligning students’ views with industry needs. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(5), 1109-1118.
• Chen, S. Y., Chen, C. H., & Liu, S. Y. (2022). History of science reading materials as everyday homework to improve middle school students’ epistemological beliefs about science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10285-3
• Chin, C. (2004). Students’ questions: Fostering a culture of inquisitiveness in science class-rooms. School Science Review, 86(314), 107-112.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Convergent parallel mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.
• De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2022). Engaging students with integrated STEM education: A happy marriage or a failed engagement? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1291-1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10159-0
• Dori, Y. J., Allouche, A., Herscu-Kluska, R., Herskovitz, O., Yarden, H., Blinder, Y., & Levenberg, S. (2023). Biomedical engineering students' question posing skill based on reading research articles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 962-978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10015-y
• Dori, Y. J., Avargil, S., Kohen, Z., & Saar, L. (2018). Context-based learning and metacognitive prompts for enhancing scientific text comprehension. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1198-1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470351
• Dori, Y. J., & Sasson, I. (2013). A three-attribute transfer skills framework – Part I: Establishing the model and its relation to chemical education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP20093K
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), Article 906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
• Fono, D., & Zohar, A. (2024). Metacognitive instruction: central aspects of pre-service and novice in-service teachers’ knowledge and professional development. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2409779
• Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
• Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., Piccardi, L., & D’Amico, S. (2021). The contribution of planning to real-world creativity: The moderating role of agreeableness. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, Article 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100890
• Gilbert, J. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
• Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20118
• Gutierrez, K. S., Kidd, J. J., Lee, M. J., Pazos, P., Kaipa, K., Ringleb, S. I., & Ayala, O. (2022). Undergraduate engineering and education students reflect on their interdisciplinary teamwork experiences following transition to virtual instruction caused by COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12(9), Article 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090623
• Hagay, G., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2015). A strategy for incorporating students’ interests into the high-school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 949-978. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.21228
• Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
• Herscovitz, O., Kaberman, Z., Saar, L., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). The relationship between metacognition and the ability to pose questions in chemical education. A. In Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.). Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 165-195). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_8
• Ibrahim M. E., Al-Shahrani, A. M., Abdalla, M. E., Abubaker, I. M., & Mohamed, M. E. (2018). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in acquisition of knowledge, soft skills during basic and preclinical sciences: Medical students’ points of view. Acta Informatica Medica, 26(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.119-124
• Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. University College Cork.
• Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811801900404
• Lavi, R., & Bertel, L. B. (2024). Active learning pedagogies in high school and undergraduate STEM education. Education Sciences, 14(9), Article 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091011
• Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002
• López-Banet, L., Ruiz González, C., & Ayuso Fernández, E. (2020). Relationships between knowledge, attitudes and interests of Spanish pre-university students in relation to different areas of biotechnology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), Article em1916. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9158
• Ng, B. L. L., Yap, K. C., & Hoh, Y. K. (2011). Students’ perception of interdisciplinary, problem-based learning in a food biotechnology course. Journal of Food Science Education, 10(1), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2010.00111.x
• NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
• Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. The School Science Review, 82(298), 23-31.
• Payoungkiattikun, W., Hemtasin, C., Intanin, A., & Thongsuk, T. (2025). Project-based learning as a catalyst for fostering metacognitive skills in preservice science teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 453-470. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.453
• Ram, I., Rosenberg-Kima, R., Lewin, D. R., Barzilai, A., Chumtonov, O., & Roll, I. (2025). Active learning and the development of 21^st century skills in online STEM education: A large-scale survey. Online Learning Journal, 29(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i1.3533
• Rivas, D. F., & Husein, S. (2022). Empathy, persuasiveness and knowledge promote innovative engineering and entrepreneurial skills. Education for Chemical Engineers, 40, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.05.002
• Salazar-Peña, R., Pedroza-Toscano, M. A., López-Cuenca, S., & Zárate-Navarro, M. A. (2023). Project-based learning for an online course of simulation engineering: From bioreactor to epidemiological modeling. Education for Chemical Engineers, 42, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.12.002
• Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1987). Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(6), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90006-1
• Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001
• Savery, J. R. (2016). Overview of problem-based learning: Definition and distinction interdisciplinary. Journal Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
• Schraw, G., & Graham, T. (1997). Helping gifted students develop metacognitive awareness. Roeper Review, 20(1), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553842
• Seiradakis, E., & Spantidakis, I. (2018). Training undergraduate engineering students to read research articles: A qualitative think-aloud study. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (pp. 1208-1213). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363367
• Shegelman, I. R., Gavrilova, O. I., Vasiliev, A. S., Sukhanov, Y. V., & Shchukin, P. O. (2018). Knowledge base creation and its use for teaching food security disciplines to university students and postgraduates. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), Article em1647. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99011
• Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET “professional skills”–Can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
• Silawi, R., Shalhoub-Awwad, Y., & Prior, A. (2020). Monitoring of reading comprehension across the first, second, and third language: Domain-general or language-specific? Language Learning, 70(3), 886-922. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12410
• Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), Article 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
• Striolo, A., Jones, A., & Styan, C. (2023). The effectiveness of an interdisciplinary post-graduate-taught program in terms of employability. Education for Chemical Engineers, 45, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2023.06.006
• Tal, T., & Tsaushu, M. (2018). Student-centered introductory biology course: Evidence for deep learning. Journal of Biological Education, 9266, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1385508
• Thomas, G. P. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 131-144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_11
• Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
• Tsaushu, M., Tal, T., Sagy, O., Kali, Y., Gepstein, S., & Zilberstein, D. (2012). Peer learning and support of technology in an undergraduate biology course to enhance deep learning. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 402-412. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-04-0042
• Türker Biber, B., Yetkin Özdemir, İ. E., & Lesh, R. (2022). Teacher noticing of students’ thinking in the context of mathematical modeling activities related to statistics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 1797-1818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10328-9
• Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2019). Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: A study of university students’ experiences. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(7), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1515195
• Wagaba, F., Treagust, D. F., Chandrasegaran, A. L., & Won, M. (2016). Using metacognitive strategies in teaching to facilitate understanding of light concepts among year 9 students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(3), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1144051
• Wagoner, S. A. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(3), 328-346. https://doi.org/10.2307/747392
• Wheeler, L., Morkowchuk, L., Wheeler, L., & Morkowchuk, L. (2020). Project-based guided inquiry (PBGI) in introductory chemistry. In J. J. Mintzes, & E. M. Walter (Eds.), Active learning in college science (pp. 341-357). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_22
• Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Pant, H. A., & Coates, H. (2016). Assessing student learning outcomes in higher education: Challenges and international perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(5), 655-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1169501
• Zoller, U. (2000). Interdisciplinary systemic HOCS development–The key for meaningful STES oriented chemical education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90021G

APA

Akiri, E., Galkin, A., Lesmes, U., Shpigelman, A., Fishman, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2025). Project-based learning outcomes: Chemical knowledge and thinking skills of biotechnology and food engineering undergraduate students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(10), em2710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17041

Vancouver

Akiri E, Galkin A, Lesmes U, Shpigelman A, Fishman A, Dori YJ. Project-based learning outcomes: Chemical knowledge and thinking skills of biotechnology and food engineering undergraduate students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(10):em2710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17041

AMA

Akiri E, Galkin A, Lesmes U, Shpigelman A, Fishman A, Dori YJ. Project-based learning outcomes: Chemical knowledge and thinking skills of biotechnology and food engineering undergraduate students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(10), em2710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17041

Chicago

Akiri, Effrat, Amit Galkin, Uri Lesmes, Avi Shpigelman, Ayelet Fishman, and Yehudit Judy Dori. "Project-based learning outcomes: Chemical knowledge and thinking skills of biotechnology and food engineering undergraduate students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 10 (2025): em2710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17041

Harvard

Akiri, E., Galkin, A., Lesmes, U., Shpigelman, A., Fishman, A., and Dori, Y. J. (2025). Project-based learning outcomes: Chemical knowledge and thinking skills of biotechnology and food engineering undergraduate students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(10), em2710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17041

MLA

Akiri, Effrat et al. "Project-based learning outcomes: Chemical knowledge and thinking skills of biotechnology and food engineering undergraduate students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 10, 2025, em2710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17041