• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Science for all Americans (New York: Oxford University Press).
• Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K. & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 5(88), 683-706.
• Beyer, B. (1988). Developing a scope and sequence for thinking skills instruction. Education Leadership, 45(7) 26- 30.
• Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding. Science Education, 84(4), 486–506.
• Brickhouse, N.W. (1990) Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53–62.
• Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives and personal reflections (New York: Teachers College Press).
• Costa, A. L. (1985), How can we recognize improved student thinking? (In: A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking (pp 288-290). (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
• Costa, A. L. (2002). Components of a dell developed thinking kills program. New Horizons for Learning. Retrieved January 3, 2007, from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/thinking/costa 2.htm
• Dancy, M. & Henderson, C. (2007). A Framework for articulating instructional practices and conceptions. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010103.
• Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2005). Beyond the individual instructor: Systemic constraints in the implementation of research-informed practices. (In: S. Franklin, J. Marx & P. Heron (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Physics Education Research Conference: American Institute of Physic).
• Fontana, A. & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. (In: N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645-673) (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
• Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform (London: Falmer Press).
• Glaser, R. E. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93-104.
• Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2005). Teaching, learning and physics education research: Views of mainstream physics professors. (In: S. Franklin, J. Marx & P. Heron (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Physics Education Research Conference: American Institute of Physics).
• Hofstein, A., Carmeli, M. & Shore, R. (2004). The professional development of high school chemistry coordinators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 3- 4.
• Hollon, R. E., Anderson, C. W., & Roth, K. J. (1991). Science teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning. (In: J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (vol 2) (pp. 145-186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press).
• Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31-57.
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(10), 65–70.
• Leou, M., Abder, P., Riordan, M. & Zoller, U. (2006). Using `HOCS-centered learning' as a pathway to promote science teachers' metacognitive development. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2) 69-84.
• National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
• National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) (2003). Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. Retrieved: January 1, 2007 from http://www.nsta.org/main/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf
• Osbourne, J., Driver, R. & Simon, S. (1998). Attitudes to science: issues and concerns. School Science Review, 79(288), 27-33.
• Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.) (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
• Pogrow, S. (1988). Teaching thinking to at-risk elementary students. Educational Leadership, 45, 79–85.
• Pogrow, S. (1996). Reforming the wannabe reformers: Why education reforms almost always end up making things worse, Phi Delta Kappan, 77(10), 656-663.
• Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think (Washington DC: National Academy Press).
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. (In: J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp.102 – 119). New York: Macmillan).
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J, & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111–139.
• Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (London: Sage Publications).
• Silverman, D. (Ed.) (1997). Qualitative research (London: Sage Publications).
• Sternberg, R. J. (1987) Questions and answers about the nature and teaching of thinking skills. (In: J. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: theory and practice (pp.252-259). New York: Freeman).
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists (New York: Cambridge University Press).
• Swartz, R. J. (2001). Infusing the teaching of thinking into content instruction. (In: A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A Resource book for teaching thinking, (3rd edition). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
• Swartz, R. J. & Parks, S. (1994). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into content instruction (Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Books & Software).
• Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59, 891-897.
• Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Why students choose physics, or reject it. Physics Education, 29(5), 368– 374.
• Yerushalmi Y. & Eylon, B. (2001). Teachers' approaches to promoting self-monitoring in physics problem solving by their students. Proceedings of the International GIREP conference on physics teacher education beyond 2000, Barcelona.
• Yerushalmi, E. & Eylon, B. S. (2004). Assessing reflection on practice: a problem solving perspective. American Institute of Physics (AIP) Conference Proceedings, September 9.
• Zohar A. (1999). Teachers` metacognitive knowledge and the instruction of higher-order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 413-429.
• Zohar A. (2004a). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher-order thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 293– 312.
• Zohar, A. (2004b). Higher-order thinking in science classrooms: Student’s learning and teachers’ professional development (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
• Zohar, A (2006). The nature and development of teachers’ metastrategic knowledge in the context of teaching higher-order thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 331–377.
• Zohar, A. & Dori, Y. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2) 145-181.
• Zoller, U. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 117- 130.

APA

Barak, M., & Shakhman, L. (2008). Reform-Based Science Teaching: Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Conceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75301

Vancouver

Barak M, Shakhman L. Reform-Based Science Teaching: Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Conceptions. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(1):11-20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75301

AMA

Barak M, Shakhman L. Reform-Based Science Teaching: Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Conceptions. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75301

Chicago

Barak, Moshe, and Larisa Shakhman. "Reform-Based Science Teaching: Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Conceptions". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2008 4 no. 1 (2008): 11-20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75301

Harvard

Barak, M., and Shakhman, L. (2008). Reform-Based Science Teaching: Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Conceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), pp. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75301

MLA

Barak, Moshe et al. "Reform-Based Science Teaching: Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Conceptions". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75301