Scientists and Scientific Thinking:
Understanding Scientific Thinking
Through an Investigation of
Scientists Views About
Superstitions and Religious Beliefs

Richard K. Coll; Mark C. Lay; Neil Taylor

doi:10.12973/ejmste/75342

Scientists and Scientific Thinking: Understanding Scientific Thinking Through an Investigation of Scientists Views About Superstitions and Religious Beliefs

Full Text (PDF)

Richard K. Coll ¹ ^* , Mark C. Lay ¹, Neil Taylor ²

More Detail

¹ University of Waikato, Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND² University of New England, Armidale, AUSTRALIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Scientific literacy is explored in this paper which describes two studies that seek to understand a particular feature of the nature of science; namely scientists’ habits of mind. The research investigated scientists’ views of scientific evidence and how scientists judge evidence claims. The first study is concerned with scientists’ views of what constitutes superstitious beliefs. The second concerned potential conflicts between scientific theories and evidence, and religious beliefs. The research findings suggest that these scientists, unlike their stereotype, hold idiosyncratic views of what constitutes good scientific evidence and sound, credible testimony. The interviews provide a window into scientific thinking as practiced by modern scientists, and suggest that the scientists are rather more open to alternative thinking than might be supposed. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of their implications for scientific literacy.

Keywords

literacy
religion
science
sociocultural
superstition

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 4, Issue 3, 2008, 197-214

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75342

Publication date: 22 Oct 2008

Article Views: 3883

Article Downloads: 3568

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Allchin, D. (1998). Values in science and science education. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1083-1092). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ben-Ari, M. (2005). Situated learning in ‘this high-technology world’. Science & Education, 14, 367-376.
Brunton, M., & Coll, R.K. (2005). Enhancing technology education by forming links with industry: A New Zealand case study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 141-166.
Cameron, C., Moss, P., & Owen, C. (1999). Men in the nursery: Gender and caring work. London: Paul Chapman:
Carson, R.N. (1998). Science and the ideals of liberal education. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1001-1014). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2002). Thalidomide. Retrieved 22 August 2005 from http://cerhr.niehs.nih. gov/genpub/topics/thalidomide2-ccae.html
Chalmers, A.F. (1999). What is this thing called science? St. Lucia, Queensland: Queensland University Press.
Coll, R.K., & Taylor, N. (2004). Probing scientists’ beliefs: How open-minded are modern scientists? International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 757-778.
Dagher, Z., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 429-445.
Dagher, Z.R., & Ford, D.J. (2005). How are scientists portrayed in children’s science biographies? Science & Education, 14, 377-393.
Dalgety, J., Zegwaard, K.E., McCurdy, S., & Coll, R.K. (September, 2003). Situated learning in cooperative education workplacements as an agent of enculturation into science academia: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Durei, A. (1997). Technology and Maori. In J. Burns (Ed.), Technology in the New Zealand curriculum (pp. 31-45). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore.
Evans, K., & Heidegger, G. (July, 1999). Situated learning and ‘Re-integration Initiatives’ for young people: Policies and practices. Roundtable discussion at the European Conference on Educational Research, Lahti, Finland.
Gauld, C.F. (1982). The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal. Science Education, 66, 109-121.
Gauld, C.F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14, 291-308.
Gauld, C.F., & Hukins, A.A. (1980). Scientific attitudes: A review. Studies in Science Education, 7, 129-161.
Good, R.G., Wandersee, J.H., & St Julien, J. (1993). Cautionary notes on the appeal of the new ‘ism’ (constructivism) in science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 71-87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gould, S.J. (1983). Evolution as fact and theory. In Hen’s teeth and horse’s toes (pp. 253-262). New York: Academic Press.
Gould, S.J. (1991a). Genesis and geology. In Bully for brontosaurus (pp. 402-415). New York: Norton.
Gould, S.J. (1991b). Justice Scalia’s misunderstanding. In Bully for brontosaurus (pp. 448-460). New York Norton.
Greenfield, B. (2000). SET Fair: A report on women in science, engineering and technology. London: Department for Trade and Industry.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
Guisasola, J., AlmudíJ.M., & Furió, C. (2005). The nature of science and its implications for physics textbooks. Science & Education, 14, 321-338.
Herron, M.D. (1969). Nature of science: Panacea or Pandora’s Box? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 105-107.
Johnson, P., & Gott, R. (1996). Constructivism and evidence from children’s ideas. Science Education, 80(5), 561-577.
Jayarata, T.E., Thomas, N.G., Trautmann, M. (2003). Intervention program to keep girls in the science pipeline: Outcome differences by ethnic status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 393-414.
Jegede, O., & Okebukola, P.A. (1989). Some socio-cultural factors militating against the drift towards science and technology in secondary schools. Research in Science and Technology Education, 7(8), 141-151.
Jegede, O.J., & Okebukola, P. A. (1991). The relationship between African traditional cosmology and students’ acquisition of a science process skill. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 37-47.
Kahle, J.B, & Lakes, M.K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(supplement), S58-S67. – Reprinted 2003.
Kass, L. (1988). Evolution and the Bible: Genesis I revisited. Commentary, 86(5), 29-39.
Guisasola, J. Almudí, & Furió, C. (2005). The nature of science and its implications for physics textbooks. Science & Education, 14, 321-338.
Laugksch, R.C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge.
Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1996a). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science & Education, 5(2), 101-123.
Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1996b). The incompatibility of science and religion sustained: A reply to our critics. Science & Education, 5(2), 189-199.
Marton F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Matthews, M.R.(1996). Editorial. Science & Education, 5, 91-99.
Matthews, M.R.(1998). The nature of science and science teaching. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 981-999). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McGeorge, C. (1992). Evolution and the New Zealand primary school curriculum 1900-1950. History of Education, 21(2), 205-218.
Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nestle, M. (2003). Safe food. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Ogawa, M. (2002, July). Nature of indigenous science: A stratified and amalgamated model of knowledge and cosmology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association. Townsville, Australia.
Paku, L., Coll, R.K. (2005, July). Workplace enculturation: Science and technology work placements as agents of enculturation for indigenous peoples. Paper presented at the 14th World Conference on Cooperative Education. Boston, MA..
Peshkin, A. (1993). The goodness of qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 24-30.
Pfundt, H., Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education (5th edn.). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
Poole, M. (1996). ‘…for more and better religious education’. Science and Education, 5, 165-174.
Preece, F.W., & Baxter, J. H. (2000). Scepticism and gullibility: The superstitious and pseudo-scientific beliefs of secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1147-1156.
Reif, F. (1995). Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 261-282.
Reiss, M.J. (2003). Science education for social justice. In C. Vincent (Ed.) Social justice, education and identity (pp. 153- 165). London: Routledge Falmer.
Sade, D., & Coll, R.K. (2003). Solomon Island stakeholders’ views of technology and technology education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 87-114.
Sutching, W.A. (1994). Notes on the cultural significance of the sciences. Science and Education, 3, 1-56.
Taylor, N., Nathan, S., & Coll, R. (2004). Education for sustainability in regional New South Wales, Australia: An exploratory study of some teachers' perceptions. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(4), 289-309.
Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism: A paradigm for the practice of science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Turner, P. (1995). An overview of feminist perspectives as they relate to science and mathematics education. The Mathematics Education, 6(1), 3-7.
Woolnough, B.E. (1996). On the fruitful compatibility of religious education and science. Science and Education, 5, 175-183.
Wretsch, J.V. (1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yates, G.C.R., & Chandler, M. (2000). Where have all the sceptics gone? Patterns of new age beliefs and antiscientific attitudes in preservice primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 377-397.
Zinman, J. (1968). Public knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press

How to cite this article

APA

Coll, R. K., Lay, M. C., & Taylor, N. (2008). Scientists and Scientific Thinking: Understanding Scientific Thinking Through an Investigation of Scientists Views About Superstitions and Religious Beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75342

Vancouver

Coll RK, Lay MC, Taylor N. Scientists and Scientific Thinking: Understanding Scientific Thinking Through an Investigation of Scientists Views About Superstitions and Religious Beliefs. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(3):197-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75342

AMA

Coll RK, Lay MC, Taylor N. Scientists and Scientific Thinking: Understanding Scientific Thinking Through an Investigation of Scientists Views About Superstitions and Religious Beliefs. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(3), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75342

Chicago

Coll, Richard K., Mark C. Lay, and Neil Taylor. "Scientists and Scientific Thinking: Understanding Scientific Thinking Through an Investigation of Scientists Views About Superstitions and Religious Beliefs". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2008 4 no. 3 (2008): 197-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75342

Harvard

Coll, R. K., Lay, M. C., and Taylor, N. (2008). Scientists and Scientific Thinking: Understanding Scientific Thinking Through an Investigation of Scientists Views About Superstitions and Religious Beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), pp. 197-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75342

MLA

Coll, Richard K. et al. "Scientists and Scientific Thinking: Understanding Scientific Thinking Through an Investigation of Scientists Views About Superstitions and Religious Beliefs". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 4, no. 3, 2008, pp. 197-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75342