• Aiken, L. R., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2006). Psychological testing and assessment (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63-71.
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
• Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2016). Practicing engineering while building with blocks: Identifying engineering thinking. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1120521.
• Barak, M., & Zadok, Y. (2009). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal of Design Education, 19, 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9043-3.
• Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2006). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research Technology in Education, 39(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481.
• Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1). Retrieved from Wired: http://www.jtla.org.
• Benitti, F. B. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58, 978-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006.
• Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020.
• Chan, H. M., & Wu, W. T. (2007). New edition of problem solving test kit. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology Press.
• Chou, P-. N. & Chen, W-.F. (2010). Chinese students’ perceptions of online learning on western discussion boards: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(2), 35-43.
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807306132.
• Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Free Press.
• Donohue, C. (Ed) (2015). Technology and digital media in the early years: Tools for teaching and learning. NY: Routledge.
• Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations, 7(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135.
• Fernandez-Samaca, L., Barrera, N., Mesa, L. A., & Perez-Holguin, W. J. (2017). Engineering for children by using robotics. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1B), 389-397.
• Forest, C. R., Moore, R. A., Jariwala, A. S., Fasse, B. B., Linsey ,J., Newstetter, W., Ngo, P. & Quintero, C. (2014). The invention studio: A university maker space and culture. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(2), 1-32.
• Hussain, S., Lindh, J., & Shukur, G. (2006). The effect of LEGO training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics, problem solving ability and attitude: Swedish Data. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 182-194.
• Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Kurti, R. S., Kurti, D. L., & Fleming, L. (2014). The philosophy of educational makerspaces. Teacher Librarian, 41(5), 8-11.
• Lee, M. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(1), 30-39.
• Lieto, M. C. D., Inguaggiato, E., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell’Omo M., Laschi, C., Pecini, C., Santerini, G., Sgandurra, G., & Dario, P. (2017). Educational robotics intervention on executive functions in preschool children: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.018.
• Lillard, A. S. (2003). Playful learning and Montessori education. American Journal of Play, 5(2), 157-186.
• Lindh, J., & Holgersson, T. (2007). Does LEGO training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems? Computers & Education, 49, 1097-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.008.
• Liu, J. (2012). Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram schools? Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.01.014.
• Massachusetts Department of Education (2006). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Retrieved on 3 March 2017 from: http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf.
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658.
• Obama, B. (2009). Remarks by the president at the national academy of sciences annual meeting. Speech presented at the National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C. Retrieved on 2 February 2017 from: https://www.energy.gov/articles/remarks-president-national-academy-sciences-annual-meeting.
• Obama, B. (2013). President Obama asks America to learn computer science. Retrieved on 2 February, 2017 from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XvmhE1J9PY.
• Olson, S., & Rapporteurs, J. L. (2014). STEM learning is everywhere: Summary of a convocation on building learning systems. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
• Padir, T., & Chernova, S. (2013). Guest Editorial: Special issue on robotics education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2235631.
• Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Sheridan, K. M., Halverson, E. R., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L. & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505-531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u.
• Stone-MacDonald, A., Wendell, K., Douglass, A., & Love, M. L. (2015). Engaging young engineers: Teaching problem-solving skills through STEM. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brookes.
• Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20238.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• The Horizon Report (2016). K–12 edition. Retrieved on 13 December, 2016 from: https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-cosn-horizon-report-2016-k-12-edition/.
• Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., & Ford, J. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782505.
• Zachman, L., Jorgensen, C., Huisingh, R., & Barrett, M. (1984). Examiner’s manual of Test of Problem Solving. Mobile, ILL: Lingui Systems.

APA

Chou, P.-N. (2018). Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1600. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483

Vancouver

Chou PN. Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(10):em1600. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483

AMA

Chou PN. Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(10), em1600. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483

Chicago

Chou, Pao-Nan. "Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 10 (2018): em1600. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483

Harvard

Chou, P.-N. (2018). Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1600. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483

MLA

Chou, Pao-Nan "Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 10, 2018, em1600. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483