• Agencia Calidad de la Educación (2015). Informe Resultados PISA 2015 [PISA 2015 Results Report]. http://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/INFORME_DE_RESULTADOS_PISA_2015.pdf
• Al-Alusi, A. (2001). Self-efficacy and its relationship to self-esteem among university students [Master's thesis, University of Baghdad].
• Al-Dhaimat, Y., Albdour, N. T., & Alshraideh, M. (2020). Creative Self-Efficacy and Its’ Relationship to Intellectual Stress among Gifted Students at the Jubilee School. World Journal of Education, 10(3), 208-219. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n3p208
• Ayotola, A., & Adedeji, T. (2009). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 953-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.169
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.
• Boston, J., & Cimpian, A. (2018). How Do We Encourage Gifted Girls to Pursue and Succeed in Science and Engineering?. Gifted Child Today, 41(4), 196-207 https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518786955
• Camci-Erdogan, S., & Riga, F. (2016). Gifted females in science. In K. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.). International Perspectives on Science Education for the Gifted: Key Issues and Challenges (pp. 106-125). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814247
• Charles, M. (2017). Venus, Mars, and math: Gender, societal affluence, and eighth graders’ aspirations for STEM. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117697179
• Charlin, V., Torres, A., & Cayumán, C. (2016). Expectativas de género y logro de estudiantes en TERCE [Gender and Student Achievement Expectations in TERCE]. Midevidencias, 9, 1-8. https://www.mideuc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/MidEvidencias-N9.pdf
• Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. G. (1995). Self-concept of gifted students: Patterns by self-concept domain, grade level, and gender. In M. W. Katzko & F. J. Mönks (Eds.) Nurturing talent: individual needs and social ability (pp. 66-74). Van Gorcum.
• Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (2015). Participación Femenina en Programas de CONICYT 2001-2014 [Female Participation in CONICYT Programs 2001-2014]. Santiago, Chile. http://www.conicyt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Participaci%C3%B3n-Femenina-2014_v5.pdf
• Conejeros-Solar, M. L., & Gómez-Arízaga, M. P. (2015). Gifted students’ characteristics, persistence, and difficulties in college. Roeper Review, 37(4), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1077909
• Conejeros-Solar, M. L., Cáceres, P., & Oneto, P. (2011). La Desatención Educativa Diferencial: Consecuencias socio-emocionales en Adolescentes con Altas Capacidades [Differential Educational Inattention: Socio-emotional Consequences in Adolescents with High Abilities]. Fondo de Investigación y Desarrollo En Educación [Fund for Research and Development in Education] - FONIDE NºF410983-2009. https://centroestudios.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/100/2017/07/Informe_Final-UCV-Maria-Leonor-Conejeros.pdf
• Conejeros-Solar, M. L., Cáceres, P., & Riveros, A. M. (2012). Educación de Talentos Académicos en Chile: Una década de aprendizajes e investigación [Education of Academic Talents in Chile: A decade of learning and research]. In J. Catalán (Editor). Investigación orientada al cambio en psicología educacional [Change-oriented research in educational psychology] (pp. 39-74). Editorial Universidad de La Serena.
• Cunningham, L. G., & Rinn, A. N. (2007). The Role of Gender and Previous Participation in a Summer Program on Gifted Adolescents’ Self-Concepts over Time. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(3), 326-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320703000303
• Dai, D. Y. (2002). Are Gifted Girls Motivationally Disadvantaged? Review, Reflection, and Redirection. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(4), 315-358. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2002-283
• Deemer E. D., Thoman D. B., Chase J. P., & Smith J. L. (2014). Feeling the threat: Stereotype threat as a contextual barrier to women’s science career choice intentions. Journal of Career Development, 41(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845313483003
• Del Río, M. F., Strasser, K., & Susperreguy, M. I. (2016). ¿Son las habilidades matemáticas un asunto de género?: Los estereotipos de género acerca de las matemáticas en niños y niñas de Kínder, sus familias y educadoras [Are math skills a gender issue?: Gender stereotypes about math in kindergarten boys and girls, their families and educators]. Calidad en la Educación-Quality in Education, (45), 20-53. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-45652016000200002
• Eccles, J. S. (2013). Gender and achievement choices. In E. T. Gershoff, R. S. Mistry, & D. Crosby (Eds.), Societal contexts of child development: pathways of influence and implications for practice and policy (pp. 19-34). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199943913.003.0002
• Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
• Fiebig, J. N. (2008). Gifted American and German adolescent women: a longitudinal examination of attachment, separation, gender roles, and career aspirations. High Ability Studies 19(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130801980349
• Fiebig, J. N., & Beauregard, E. (2011). Longitudinal Change and Maternal Influence on Occupational Aspirations of Gifted Female American and German Adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400103
• Finch, H. (2005). Comparison of the Performance of Nonparametric and Parametric MANOVA Test Statistics when Assumptions Are Violated. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-1881.1.1.27
• Fraser, B. (1981). Test of Science-Related Attitudes [Handbook]. Allanby Press, Macquarie University.
• Gagné, F. (2015). De los genes al talento: La perspectiva DMGT/CMTD. Revista de Educación, 368, 12-39. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-289
• Gagné, F. (2018). Academic talent development: Theory and best practices. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 163-184). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-011
• Gómez-Arízaga, M., & Conejeros-Solar, M.L. (2013). Am I That Talented? The experiences of gifted individuals from diverse educational backgrounds at the postsecondary level. High Ability Studies. 24(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2013.838898
• Gómez-Arízaga, M., Valdivia-Lefort, M., Castillo-Hermosilla, H., Hébert, T., & Conejeros-Solar, M. (2020). Tales from Within: Gifted Students’ Lived Experiences with Teaching Practices in Regular Classrooms. Education Sciences. 10(5), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050137
• Greenlee M. (2016). The Effects of Girls self-efficacy on their Interest and Involvement in Mathematics and Science. (Master’s thesis), California State University. http://dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/163467/Greenlee-Mary-thesis-2016.pdf?sequence=1
• Gubbels J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Cognitive, socioemotional, and attitudinal effects of a triarchic enrichment program for gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 378-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214552565
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
• Heilbronner, N. N. (2013). The STEM Pathway for Women: What Has Changed? Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460085
• Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001
• Hutchinson, J. (2013). School Organisation and STEM Career related Learning. STEM Centre, University of Derby. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/46170662.pdf
• Kao, C. (2015). Mathematically gifted adolescent females’ mixed sentiment toward gender stereotypes. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9278-2
• Kaufman, S. B., & Sternberg, R.J. (2008). Conceptions of Giftedness. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.) Handbook of Giftedness in Children (pp. 71-91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_5
• Kerr, B. (Ed.). (2009). Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity and talent. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971959
• Kerr, B. A., & Kurpius, S. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000225357
• Kerr, B. A., & McKay, R. (2014). Smart Girls in the 21st Century: Understanding Talented Girls and Women. Great Potential Press, Inc.
• Kerr, B. A., & Multon, K. D. (2015). The development of gender identity, gender roles, and gender relations in gifted students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00194.x
• Kerr, B. A., Vuyk, M. A., & Rea, C. (2012). Gendered practices in the education of gifted girls and boys. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 647-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21627
• Kollmayer, M., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in education: Development, consequences, and interventions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1193483
• Kundu, A., & Ghose, A. (2016). The relationship between attitude and self-efficacy in mathematics among higher secondary students. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(4), 25-31. http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2021%20Issue4/Version-5/F0214052531.pdf
• Lee, C. Y., & Kung, H. Y. (2018). Math self-concept and mathematics achievement: Examining gender variation and reciprocal relations among junior high school students in Taiwan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1239-1252. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82535
• Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262-265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
• Lewis, J. D., & Knight, H. V. (2000). Self-concept in gifted youth: An investigation employing the Piers-Harris subscales. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400105
• López, V., Conejeros, M. L., García, M. C., Gudenschwager, H., & Proestakis, A. (2013). Gifted Education in Chile amidst Public Debate on Excellence without Equity in Education. In P. Sanchez-Escobedo. Talent development around the world. A global perspective on gifted education (pp.167-199). Lambert Academic Publishing.
• Mackintosh, N. J., & Bennett, E. S. (2005). What do Raven’s Matrices measure? An analysis in terms of sex differences. Intelligence, 33, 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.03.004
• Martínez-Gómez, J., Guerrero-Rodríguez, S. M., & Rey-Anacona, C. A. (2012). Evaluación de la validez de constructo y la confiabilidad del inventario de masculinidad y femineidad en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes colombianos [Evaluation of the construct validity and reliability of the inventory of masculinity and femininity in Colombian adolescents and young adults]. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana-Advances in Latin American Psychology, 30(1), 170-181. https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/apl/article/view/1180/1800
• Maso, V. & Proestakis, A. (2007). Talento y Género: Reconstrucción de la experiencia de adolescentes mujeres de 13 a 17 años con Talento Académico que asisten al Programa DeLTA UCN [Talent and Gender: Reconstruction of the experience of adolescent women between the ages of 13 and 17 with academic talent who attend the DeLTA UCN Programme]. Boletin de Educación, Universidad Católica del Norte, 39, 1-28. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Verena_Maso_Varas/publication/258499233_Talento_y_Genero_Reconstruccion_de_la_experiencia_de_adolescentes_mujeres_de_13_a_17_anos_con_Talento_Academico_que_asisten_al_Programa_DeLTA_UCN/links/00b4952857e55b681a000000.pdf
• Microsoft Foundation (2016). Why Europe’s girls aren’t studying STEM. https://news.microsoft.com/europe/features/dont-european-girls-like-science-technology/#sm.00001s38on4s1eopujl24aj97v6kn
• Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631-644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005
• Ministerio de Educación (2010). Decreto 341. Modifica decreto nº 230, de 2007, que establece normas que regulan el programa promoción de talentos en escuelas y liceos y fija texto refundido [Decree 341. Modifies Decree No. 230, of 2007, which establishes norms that regulate the talent promotion program in schools and high schools and establishes a consolidated text]. http://legislacion-oficial.vlex.cl/vid/modifica-talentos-liceos-refundido-240277002
• Ministerio de Educación. (2011). Becas y créditos educación superior. Beca de Nivelación Académica (propedéutico) [Scholarships and financial aid in higher education: Scholarship for academic remedial]. http://portal2010.becasycreditos.cl/beca_propedeutico.html
• Nagy, G., Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2010). The development of students’ mathematics self-concept in relation to gender: Different countries, different trajectories? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 482-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00644.x
• National Association for Gifted Children (2020, June 15). What is Giftedness? https://www.nagc.org/
• Navarro, M., Förster, C., González, C., & González-Pose, P. (2016). Attitudes toward science: Measurement and psychometric properties of the test of science-related attitudes for its use in Spanish-speaking classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1459-1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1195521
• Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High ability studies, 13(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130220132316
• Ogbuehi, P. I., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Learning environment, attitudes and conceptual development associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 10(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9026-z
• Olson, C. L. (1979). Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: A rejoinder to Stevens. Psychological Bulletin, 86(6), 1350-1352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.6.1350
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008). Informe PISA 2006, Competencias científicas para el mundo del mañana [PISA 2006 Report, Scientific Competences for Tomorrow’s World]. Santillana.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do - Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. OECD Publishing, 1. https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en
• Osandón, L., Caro, M., Magendzo, A., Abraham, M., Lavín, S., González, F., & Cabaluz, J. F. (2018). Estado, mercado y currículum escolar: la experiencia chilena (1964-2018) [State, market and school curriculum: the Chilean experience (1964-2018)]. Reflexiones en curso, Nº 20, Serie Cuestiones actuales y fundamentales del currículo, el aprendizaje y la evaluación [Ongoing Reflections, No. 20, Current and Fundamental Issues of Curriculum, Learning and Assessment Series]. IBE-UNESCO. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326424061_Osandon_et_al_2018_Estado_mercado_y_curriculum_escolar_la_experiencia_chilena_1964-2018_Reflexiones_en_curso_N_20_Serie_Cuestiones_actuales_y_fundamentales_del_curriculo_el_aprendizaje_y_la_evaluacion?channel=doi&linkId=5b4cc2c50f7e9b240fe4eb2c&showFulltext=true
• Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary educational psychology, 24(2), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0991
• Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34, 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.797339
• Peer, J., & Fraser, B. (2015). Sex, grade-level and stream differences in learning environment and attitudes to science in Singapore primary schools. Learning Environments Research, 18(1), 143-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9142-x
• Plieninger, H., & Dickhäuser, O. (2015). The female fish is more responsive: gender moderates the bflpe in the domain of science. Educational Psychology, 35, 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814197
• Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208315834
• Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., Goetz, T., & Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Female ‘big fish’ swimming against the tide: the ‘big-fish-little-pond effect’ and gender-ratio in special gifted classes. Contemporary Education Psychology, 33(1), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.08.001
• Probst, J. R. (2019). A Causal-Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Self-Efficacy Based on Gender and Math Acceleration (Doctoral dissertation), Liberty University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/213463554.pdf
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1993). Test de Matrices Progresivas (Manual). Paidós.
• Recber, S., Isiksal, M., & Koç, Y. (2018). Investigating self-efficacy, anxiety, attitudes and mathematics achievement regarding gender and school type. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 34(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.1.229571
• Reilly, D., Neumann, D., & Andrews, G. (2019). Investigating Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey. Research in science education, 49, 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6
• Roa-Tampe, K., Castillo-Hermosilla, H., Valdivia-Lefort, M., Briseño Ossandon, M., Gómez-Arízaga, M., Navarro, M., Martin, A., Rivera-Lino, B., & Conejeros-Solar, M. (2020). Autoconcepto y alta capacidad: influencia de estereotipos de género y programas de enriquecimiento [Self-concept and high ability: influence of gender stereotypes and enrichment programs]. Revista Espacios, 41(17). https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n17/20411714.html
• Rudasill, K. M., Capper, M. R., Foust, R. C., Callahan, C. M., & Albaugh, S. B. (2009). Grade and Gender Differences in Gifted Students’ Self-Concepts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(3), 340-367. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2009-862
• Scantebury, K., & Baker, D. (2007). Gender issues in science education research: Remembering where the differences lie. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on science education (pp. 257-286). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274523811_Comparative_Study_on_Pre-Service_Science_Teachers’_Self-Efficacy_Beliefs_of_Teaching_in_Kenya_and_the_United_States_of_America_USA
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-Efficacy Theory in Education. In K. R. Wentzel & David B. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 34-54). Routledge Handbooks Online. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315773384.ch3
• Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
• Turki, J., & Al-Qaisi, L. (2012). Adjustment problems and self-efficacy among gifted students in Salt Pioneer Center. Int J EduSci, 4(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2012.11890020
• Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002
• Valenti, S., Masnick, A., Cox, B., & Osman, C. (2016). Adolescents’ and Emerging Adults’ Implicit Attitudes about STEM Careers: “Science Is Not Creative”. Science Education International, 27(1), 40-58.
• Vera, A., Castejón, J., Miñano, P., & Gilar-Corbí, R. (2019). Actitudes en la adolescencia inicial y rendimiento académico: el rol mediacional del autoconcepto académico [Attitudes in early adolescence and academic performance: the mediating role of academic self-concept]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24(1), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.11.002
• Villarroel, V. (2001). Relación entre autoconcepto y rendimiento académico [Relationship between self-concept and academic performance]. PSYKHE, 10(1), 3-18. http://www.psykhe.cl/index.php/psykhe/article/view/418
• Webb-Williams, J. (2018). Science self-efficacy in the primary classroom: Using mixed methods to investigate sources of self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 939-961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0
• Young, J. L., Young, J. R., & Ford, D. Y. (2019) Culturally Relevant STEM Out-of-School Time: A Rationale to Support Gifted Girls of Color, Roeper Review, 41(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553215
• Zalazar, M. F., Aparicio, M. M. D., Ramírez, C. M., & Garrido, S. J. (2011). Estudios Preliminares de Adaptación de la Escala de Fuentes de Autoeficacia para Matemáticas [Preliminary Studies of Adaptation of the Scale of Sources of Self-efficacy for Mathematics]. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 3(2), 1-6. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=333427073001
• Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes, International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126766

Vancouver

Gómez-Arízaga MP, Navarro M, Martin A, Roa-Tampe K, Conejeros-Solar ML, Kronborg L, et al. Socio-emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12):em1929. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9374

APA

Gómez-Arízaga, M. P., Navarro, M., Martin, A., Roa-Tampe, K., Conejeros-Solar, M. L., Kronborg, L., . . . Rivera-Lino, B. (2020). Socio-emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1929. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9374

AMA

Gómez-Arízaga MP, Navarro M, Martin A, et al. Socio-emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12), em1929. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9374

Chicago

Gómez-Arízaga, María P., Marianela Navarro, Annjeannette Martin, Karin Roa-Tampe, María Leonor Conejeros-Solar, Leonie Kronborg, Marieta Valdivia-Lefort, Hernán Castillo-Hermosilla, and Bárbara Rivera-Lino. "Socio-emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 12 (2020): em1929. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9374

Harvard

Gómez-Arízaga, M. P., Navarro, M., Martin, A., Roa-Tampe, K., Conejeros-Solar, M. L., Kronborg, L., . . . Rivera-Lino, B. (2020). Socio-emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1929. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9374

MLA

Gómez-Arízaga, María P. et al. "Socio-emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, 2020, em1929. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9374