• Abrahams, I. (2009) Does Practical Work Really Motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2335–2353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802342836.
• Abrahams, I. (2011) Practical Work in Secondary Science: A Minds-On Approach. London: Continuum.
• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305.
• Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011a). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001.
• Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011b). A Cultural Perspective on the Structure of Student Interest in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518640.
• Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, T. I. (1999). Investigating Classroom Environments in Taiwan and Australia with Multiple Research Methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597628.
• Altricher, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers Investigate their Work: An Introduction to the Methods of Action Research. London: Routledge.
• Anderson, R. (1998). Intuitive inquiry: A transpersonal approach. In Braud, W. and Anderson, R. (eds.) Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience. (pp. 69-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Anderson, R. (2004). Intuitive inquiry: An epistemology of the heart for scientific inquiry. The Humanistic Psychologist, 32(4), 307-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2004.9961758.
• Archambault, I., Pagani, L. S., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2013). Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade. Learning and Instruction, 23, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.003.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
• Bandura, A. (1986a). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1986b). The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3(4), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Benware, C., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004755.
• Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The Teacher-Child Relationship and Children’s Early School Adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5.
• Blumenfeld, P., & Meece, J. L. (1988) Task factors, teacher behavior, and students’ involvement and use of learning strategies in science. Elementary School Journal, 46, 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1086/461536.
• Boggiano, A. K., & Pittman, T. S. (Eds.) (1992). Achievement and Motivation: A Social-Developmental Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7.
• Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). A Cyclical Self-Regulatory Account of Student Engagement: Theoretical Foundations and Applications. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 237 – 257). New York: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11.
• Close, W., & Solberg, S. (2008). Predicting Achievement, Distress, and Retention among Lower-Income Latino Youth. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.007.
• Connell, J. P. and Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Engagement Versus Disaffection: Motivated Patterns of Action In the Academic Domain. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
• Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.2.222.
• Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (3rd edn.) Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
• Cronin, A. (2008). Focus Groups. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching Social Life. (3rd edn.) Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
• Darby, L. (2005). Science Students’ Perceptions of Engaging Pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35, 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-4488-4.
• de Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21, 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.002.
• Deci, E. L., & Moller, A. C. (2005). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In, Elliot, A.J. and Dweck, C. (eds.) Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 579-597) New York: Guilford Press.
• Dewey, J. (1938a). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt. Retrieved on 4th February 2018 from https://archive.org/details/JohnDeweyLogicTheTheoryOfInquiry.
• Dewey, J. (1938b/1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
• Dewey, J. (1902/1990). The School and Society and the Child and the Curriculum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226112114.001.0001.
• Finn, J. D. (1989) Withdrawing from School. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117.
• Fischer, C. T. (ed.) (2006). Qualitative research methods for psychologists: Introduction through empirical studies. New York: Academic Press.
• Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic Motivation and School Performance: Toward a Structural Model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1017.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
• Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood to adolescence: Growth trajectories in two “male-typed” domains. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519.
• Grolnick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890.
• Guay, F., Ratelle, C., Larose, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Vitaro, F. (2013). The number of autonomy-supportive relationships: Are more relationships better for motivation, perceived competence, and achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.005.
• Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-Teacher Relationships. Retrieved on 4th February 2018 from http://www.pearweb.org/conferences/sixth/pdfs/NAS-CBIII-05-1001-005-hamre%20&%20Pianta%20.
• proof.pdf.
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Manderlink, G., & Sansone, C. (1992). Competence processes and achievement motivation: Implications for intrinsic motivation. In A. K. Boggiano and T.S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and Motivation: A Social-Developmental Perspective (pp. 115 – 137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hardre, P. L., Chen, C-H., Huang, S-H. Chiang, C-T., Jen, F-L., & Warden, L. (2006). Factors Affecting High School Students’ Academic Motivation in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790600937326.
• Harter, S. (1992). The relationship between perceived competence, affect, and motivational orientation with the classroom: Processes and patterns of change. In In A. K. Boggiano and T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and Motivation: A Social-Developmental Perspective (pp. 77 - 114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Harter, S. (2012a). The Construction of the Self: Developmental and Sociocultural Foundations. (2nd edn) New York: The Guilford Press.
• Harter, S. (2012b). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents (Revised Edition). Denver, CO: University of Denver. Retrieved on 1st February 2018 from https://portfolio.du.edu/SusanHarter/page/44210.
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximising Impact on Learning. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522.
• Hipkins, R. (2012). The Engaging Nature of Teaching for Competency Development. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_21.
• Hughes, A., Galbraith, D., & White, D. (2011). Perceived Competence: A Common Core for Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept? Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(3), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.559390.
• Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1.
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal Test of Self-Determination Theory’s Motivation Mediation Model in a Naturally Occurring Classroom Context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175-1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028089.
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships Matter: linking Teacher Support to Student Engagement and Achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x.
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700601.
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056.
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2012). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. (3rd edn.) London: Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203801550.
• Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328157.
• Lee, O., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in middle school science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 585–610. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030003585.
• Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 585–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<303::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-X.
• Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1997). Children’s relationships with adults and peers: An examination of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00031-3.
• Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Feldman Farb, A. (2012). Engagement across Developmental Periods. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 45 - 63). New York: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_3.
• Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R.G. (2006). Reciprocal Effects of Self-Concept and Performance from a Multidimensional Perspective: Beyond Seductive Pleasure and Unidimensional Perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x.
• Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1998). Structure, Stability, and Development of Young Children’s Self-Concepts: A Multicohort-Multioccasion Study. Child Development, 69(4), 1030–1053.
• Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501.
• Marsh, H. W., & O’Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal Effects between Academic Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Achievement, and Attainment Over Seven Adolescent Years: Unidimensional and Multidimensional Perspectives of Self-Concept. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312313.
• Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1.
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Science Achievement in the Primary School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Science Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
• Murphy, C., Varley, J., & Veale, O. (2012) I’d rather they did experiments with us… than just talking: Irish children’s views of primary school science. Journal of Research in Science Education, 41(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9204-3.
• OECD (2000). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2000-en.
• OECD (2007). PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
• OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume 1). Paris: OECD.
• OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to Learn Students’ Engagement, Drive and Self-Beliefs. Volume III. Paris: OECD.
• Painter, J. (2011). Autonomy, Competence, and Intrinsic Motivation in Science Education: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis), University of North Carolina.
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543.
• Park, S., Holloway, S. D., Arendtsz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2012). What makes students engaged in learning? A time-use study of within- and between-individual predictors of emotional engagement in low-performing high schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9738-3.
• Pat El, R., Tellima, H., & van Koppen, S. W. (2012). Effects of Formative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation: Examining Ethnic Differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 449-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.001.
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology: Vol.7 (pp. 199 – 234). New York: Wiley.
• Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. S. (1992). Teacher-Child Relationships and the Process of Adjusting to School. New Directions for Child Development, 57, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219925706.
• Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher–child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006519.
• Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 444–458.
• Pianta, R. C., Stuhlman, M. W., & Hamre, B. K. (2002). How school can do better: Fostering stronger connections between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development, 93, 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.23320029307.
• Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270050301.
• Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S.L. (2012). Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 3 – 20). New York: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1.
• Reeve, J. (2002). Self-Determination Theory Applied to Educational Settings in E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 183 – 204). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
• Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149 – 172). New York: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7.
• Ryan, A. (2001). The Peer Group as a Context for the Development of Young Adolescent Motivation and Achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00338.
• Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450.
• Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P. & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In Ames, C. and Ames, R.E. (eds.) Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu. New York: Academic Press.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E.L. (2000a). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting Self-Determined School Engagement; Motivation, Learning and Well-Being. In K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 171 – 196). New York: Routledge.
• Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, M. (2013). A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment. Sociology, 47(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128.
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005) Competence Perceptions and Academic Functioning. In Elliot, A.J. and Dweck, C.S. (eds.) (2005) Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York: London.
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Altenor, A. (1980). Learned Helplessness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18(5), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(80)90012-1.
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
• Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping and Everyday Resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21 - 44). New York: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2.
• Smith, C. P. (ed.) (2008). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Smyth, J. (1996). Developing socially critical educators. In Boud, D. & Miller, N. (eds.) (1996) Working with Experience: Animating learning. (pp. 27 – 40). London: Routledge.
• Thomas, G. (2002). Theory’s Spell: On Qualitative Inquiry and Educational Research. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920220137476.
• Thomas, G. (2004). Introduction: evidence and practice. In Thomas, G. and Pring, R. (eds.) (2004) Evidence-Based Practice in Education. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
• Tymms, P., Bolden, D., & Merrell, C. (2008). Science in English primary schools: trends in attainment, attitudes and approaches. In Perspectives on Education: Primary Science. Issue 1, September 2008. London; Wellcome Trust.
• Urdan, T., & Turner, J. C. (2007). Competence Motivation in the Classroom. In A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.) Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 297-317). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.6.1.94.
• Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2012). Identifying Configurations of Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support and Structure: Associations with Self-Regulated Learning, Motivation and Problem Behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002.
• Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the Motivational Impact of Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Framing and Autonomy-Supportive Versus Internally Controlling Communication Style on Early Adolescents’ Academic Achievement. Child Development, 76(2), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x.
• Voelkl, K. E. (1995) School Warmth, Student Participation, and Achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943817.
• Voelkl, K. E. (1996) Measuring Students’ Identification with School. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 760-770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005003.
• Voelkl, K. E. (1997) Identification with schools. American Journal of Education, 105, 294-318. https://doi.org/10.1086/444158.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Willms, J. D. (2003). Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD. Retrieved on 8th October 2017 from http://www2.unb.ca/crisp/pdf/0306.pdf.
• Zhou, N., Lam, S-F., & Chan, K. C. (2012) The Chinese Classroom Paradox: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Teacher Controlling Behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1162-1174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027609.

APA

Wood, R. (2019). Students’ Motivation to Engage with Science Learning Activities through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Results from a Single-Case School-Based Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110

Vancouver

Wood R. Students’ Motivation to Engage with Science Learning Activities through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Results from a Single-Case School-Based Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(7):em1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110

AMA

Wood R. Students’ Motivation to Engage with Science Learning Activities through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Results from a Single-Case School-Based Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(7), em1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110

Chicago

Wood, Roger. "Students’ Motivation to Engage with Science Learning Activities through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Results from a Single-Case School-Based Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 7 (2019): em1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110

Harvard

Wood, R. (2019). Students’ Motivation to Engage with Science Learning Activities through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Results from a Single-Case School-Based Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110

MLA

Wood, Roger "Students’ Motivation to Engage with Science Learning Activities through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Results from a Single-Case School-Based Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 7, 2019, em1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110