Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Christian Bob Nicol; Emmanuel Gakuba; Gonzague Habinshuti

doi:10.29333/ejmste/11793

Full Text (PDF)

Christian Bob Nicol ¹ ^* , Emmanuel Gakuba ² , Gonzague Habinshuti ³

More Detail

¹ African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science, College of Education, University of Rwanda, RWANDA² Department of Mathematics, Science and Physical Education, College of Education, University of Rwanda, RWANDA³ School of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, College of Education, University of Rwanda, RWANDA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The scientific community continues to give conflicting impressions about the contribution of laboratory activities to science learning and yet ignores the views of students who are the focus of learning. In this paper, we reviewed postsecondary school students’ experiences in the science laboratories. Students were most concerned about the impact of the laboratory activities and their preferences pointed more towards greater independent, participatory and interactive learning engagements. This review has implied that students should not be left out in science laboratory learning reform efforts and their views about what obtains in the science laboratories should be routinely monitored to inform such reforms.

Keywords

science laboratories
laboratory activities
students’ views
students’ preferences
laboratory learning

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2022, Volume 18, Issue 3, Article No: em2087

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793

Publication date: 23 Feb 2022

Article Views: 2314

Article Downloads: 5503

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Aykutlu, I., Bezen, S., & Bayrak, C. (2019). An examination of pre-service teachers’ metaphorical perceptions concerning physics lab applications. Journal of Faculty of Education, 8(1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.463841
Berber, N. C. (2013). Anxieties, preferences, expectations and opinions of pre-service teachers related to physics laboratory. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(15), 1220-1230.
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390
Braun, M., & Kirkup, L. (2016). Non-physics peer demonstrators in undergraduate laboratories: A study of students’ perceptions. European Journal of Physics, 37(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/01430807/37/1/015703
Burrows, N. L., Nowak, M. K., & Mooring, S. R. (2017). Students’ perceptions of a project-based organic chemistry laboratory environment: A phenomenographic approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 811-824. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00064B
Carnduff, J., & Reid, N. (2003). Enhancing undergraduate chemistry laboratories: Pre‐laboratory and post‐laboratory exercises, examples and advice. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Chatterjee, S., Williamson, V. M., McCann, K., & Peck, M. L. (2009). Surveying students’ attitudes and perceptions toward guided-inquiry and open-inquiry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1427-1432. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1427
Crandall, P. G., O’Bryan, C. A., Killian, S. A., Beck, D. E., Jarvis, N., & Clausen, E. (2015). A comparison of the degree of student satisfaction using a simulation or a traditional wet lab to teach physical properties of ice. Journal of Food Science Education, 14(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12049
Deacon, C., & Hajek, A. (2011). Student perceptions of the value of physics laboratories. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 943-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.481682
Dikmenli, M. (2009). Biology student teachers’ ideas about purpose of laboratory work. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 1-14.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education, (pp. 1191-1239). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_79
Freedman, M. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4%3C343:AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-R
Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2015). Video episodes and action cameras in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: Eliciting student perceptions of meaningful learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00196J
George-Williams, S. R., Ziebell, A. L., Kitson, R. R. A., Coppo, P., Thompson, C. D., & Overton, T. L. (2018). ‘What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?’ A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 463-473. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00177K
Goldina, A., & Barattini, D. (2018). Exploring student perceptions of a station-based teaching approach in the human anatomy and physiology laboratory. HAPS Educator, 22(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2018.007
Hanif, M., Sneddon, P. H., Al-Ahmadi, F. M., & Reid, N. (2009). The perceptions, views and opinions of university students about physics learning during undergraduate laboratory work. European Journal of Physics, 30(85), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/30/1/009
Harman, G., Cokelez, A., Dal, B., & Alper, U. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ views on laboratory applications in science education: The effect of a two-semester course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040103
Henige, K. (2011). Undergraduate student attitudes and perceptions toward low- and high-level inquiry exercise physiology teaching laboratory experiences. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(2), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00086.2010
Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22(1), 85-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269308560022
Hofstein, A., & Kind, P. M. (2012). Learning in and from science laboratories. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 189-207). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_15
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170311
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 8(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Horsley, J., & Moeed, A. (2018). “Inspire me”-High-ability students’ perceptions of school science. Science Education International, 29(3), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v29.i3.4
Karacop, A., & Diken, E. H. (2017). The effects of jigsaw technique based on cooperative learning on prospective science teachers’ science process skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 86-97.
King, N., Touw, T. V., Spowart, L., & Lawlor, C. (2016). A scoping study investigating student perceptions towards inquiry-based learning in the laboratory. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 305‐314. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9472
Koretsky, M., Kelly, C., & Gummer, E. (2011). Student perceptions of learning in the laboratory: Comparison of industrially situated virtual laboratories to capstone physical laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 540-573. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00026.x
Landis, R. N., & Reschly, A. L. (2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 220-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213480864
Leung, A. C. K., Terrana, A., & Jarzak, S. (2016). Students' opinions on the educational values of physics laboratories: A cross-sectional survey. Canadian Journal of Physics, 94(3), 913-919. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2016-0358
McDonnel, C., O’Connor, C., & Seery, M. K. (2007). Developing practical chemistry skills by means of student-driven problem based learning mini-projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90026G
Moozeh, K., Farmer, J., Tihanyi, D., Nadar, T., & Evans, G. J. (2019). A prelaboratory framework toward integrating theory and utility value with laboratories: Student perceptions on learning and motivation. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1548-1557. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00107
Natinal Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Ott, L. E., Kephart, K., Stolle-McAllister, K., & LaCourse, W. R. (2018). Students’ understanding and perceptions of assigned team roles in a classroom laboratory environment. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(4), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_047_04_83
Priest, S. J., Pyke, S. M., & Williamson, N. M. (2014). Student perceptions of chemistry experiments with different technological interfaces: A comparative study. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1787-1795. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400835h
Russell, C. B., & Weaver, G. (2008). Student perceptions of the purpose and function of the laboratory in science: A grounded theory study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020209
Sadoglu, G. P., & Durukan, U. G. (2018). Determining the perceptions of teacher candidates on the concepts of science course, science laboratory, science teacher and science student via metaphors. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 436-453. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.428260
Sandström, N., Ketonen, E., & Lonka, K. (2014). The experience of laboratory learning–How do chemistry students perceive their learning environment? The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 11(4), 1613-1625. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.144
Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9060-9
Sneddon, P. H., Slaughter, K. A., & Reid, N. (2009). Perceptions, views and opinions of university students about physics learning during practical work at school. European Journal of Physics, 30(5), 1119-1129. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/30/5/018
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
Taber, K. S. (2007). Science education for gifted learners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962046
Tatar, N. (2012). Inquiry-based science laboratories: An analysis of preservice teachers’ beliefs about learning science through inquiry and their performances. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(3), 248-266. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288284135
Thomas, G., & Meldrum, A. (2018). Students’ perceptions of changes to the learning environments of undergraduate physics laboratories: An empirical study. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(4), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2017-0045
Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858-867. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16350
Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory–A historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12(7), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025692409001
Tsai, C. (2003). Taiwanese science students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the laboratory learning environments: Exploring epistemological gaps. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305031
Uyulgan, M. A., & Akkuzu, N. (2018). Educational short videos to utilize in the biochemistry laboratory: Opinions of university students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(3), 496-510. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.496
von Aufschnaiter, C., & von Aufschnaiter, S. (2007). University students’ activities, thinking and learning during laboratory work. European Journal of Physics, 28, S51–S60. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/S05
Weiman, C., & Holmes, N. G. (2015). Measuring the impact of an instructional laboratory on the learning of introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 83(11), 972-978. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4931717
Whelan, A., Leddy, J. J., Mindra, S., Hughes, J. D., El-Baily, S., & Ramnanan, C. J. (2016). Students’ perceptions of independent versus facilitated small group learning approaches to compressed medical anatomy education. Anatomical Science Education, 9(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1544
Wright, S. J. (2012). Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(3), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1265
Yildirim, N. (2016). Opinions of pre-service classroom teachers towards laboratory using in science instruction and their preferences towards laboratory approaches. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(3), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1304

How to cite this article

APA

Nicol, C. B., Gakuba, E., & Habinshuti, G. (2022). Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), em2087. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793

Vancouver

Nicol CB, Gakuba E, Habinshuti G. Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(3):em2087. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793

AMA

Nicol CB, Gakuba E, Habinshuti G. Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(3), em2087. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793

Chicago

Nicol, Christian Bob, Emmanuel Gakuba, and Gonzague Habinshuti. "Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 3 (2022): em2087. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793

Harvard

Nicol, C. B., Gakuba, E., and Habinshuti, G. (2022). Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), em2087. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793

MLA

Nicol, Christian Bob et al. "Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 3, 2022, em2087. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793