• Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2004). Use of Multitrait-Multimethod Modelling to Validate Actual and Preferred Forms of the Technology-Rich Outcomes-Focused Learning Environment Inventory (Troflei). Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 4, 110–125.
• Augusto, J. C. (2009). Ambient Intelligence: Opportunities and Consequences of its Use in Smart Classrooms. Italics, 8(2), 53–63. doi:10.11120/ital.2009.08020053
• Bielefeldt, T. (2012). Guidance for Technology Decisions from Classroom Observation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3), 205–223. doi:10.1080/15391523.2012.10782587
• Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01098.x
• Brooks, D. C. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behavior. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2). Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/ojs/index.php/jls/article/viewArticle/285
• Brown, M. (2005). Learning Spaces. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the next generation (pp. 12.1 – 12.22). Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00974.x
• Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 31–44. doi:10.1007/s10984-008-9051-6
• Connor, C. M. (2013). Commentary on two classroom observation systems: Moving toward a shared understanding of effective teaching. School Psychology Quarterly : The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 28(4), 342–346. doi:10.1037/spq0000045
• Dorman, J. (2009). Associations between psychosocial environment and outcomes in technology-rich classrooms in Australian secondary schools. Research in Education, 82, 69–84. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/manup/rie/2009/00000082/00000001/art00006
• Dorman, J. P., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Psychosocial environment and affective outcomes in technologyrich classrooms: testing a causal model. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 77–99. doi:10.1007/s11218-008-9069-8
• Elmendorf, D., & Song, L. (2015). Developing Indicators for a Classroom Observation Tool on Pedagogy and Technology Integration: A Delphi Study. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 32(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/07380569.2014.967620
• Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=SBSdAAAAMAAJ
• Fraser, B. J. B. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–33. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/X318568887820545.pdf
• Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1983). Validity and Use of the Classroom Environment Scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 5(3), 261–271.
• Goh, S. C., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.). (2002). Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective. Singapore: World Scientific
• Huang, R., Hu, Y., & Yang, J. (2015). Improving Learner Experience in the Technology Rich Classrooms. In Kinshuk; & R. Huang (Eds.), Ubiquitous Learning Environments and Technologies (pp. 243–258). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44659-1
• Huang, R., & Yang, J. (2014). The Framework and Method for Understanding the New Generation of Learners. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & N.-S. Chen (Eds.), The New Development of Technology Enhanced Learning SE - 1 (pp. 3–25). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38291-8_1
• Kim, J.-W. (2012). Implementation of Smart Classroom Information Display System Using RFID. In Kim, TH and Stoica, A and Fang, WC and Vasilakos, T and Villalba, JG and Arnett, KP and Khan, MK and Kang, BH (Eds.), Computer Applications for Security, Control and Ststem Engineering (pp. 314– 321). Berlin, Heidelber: Springer.
• Koper, R. (2014). Conditions for effective smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1). doi:10.1186/s40561-014-0005-4
• Lewin, K. (1939). Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods. The American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896. doi:10.2307/2769418
• Li, B., Kong, S. C., & Chen, G. (2015). Development and validation of the smart classroom inventory. Smart Learning Environments, 2(1). doi:10.1186/s40561-015-0012-0
• Liang, J. (2015). Live video classroom observation: an effective approach to reducing reactivity in collecting observational information for teacher professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(3), 235–253. doi:10.1080/02607476.2015.1045314
• Lui, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2014). Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 57–80. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
• MacAulay, D. J. (1990). Classroom Environment: a literature review. Educational Psychology, 10(3), 239- 259. doi:10.1080/0144341900100305
• Manny-ikan, E., Tikochinski, T. B., & Zorman, R. (2011). Using the Interactive White Board in Teaching and Learning – An Evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM Pilot Project Background – Use of Interactive White Boards (IWBs). Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 249– 272.
• Massat, C. R., & Sanders, D. (2009). Classroom observation. In Constable, R., Massat, C. R., McDonald, S. & Flynn, J. P. (Eds.), School social work: Practice, policy, and research (7th Ed.) (pp. 452–463) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, Inc. doi: 10.2307/814884
• MOE. (2001). Curriculum Reform Outline in Basic Education (Pilot). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s8001/201404/167343.html
• Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Development and use of an instrument for computer-supported learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 4, 115–138.
• Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Teachers: an analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 51–74.
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
• Radcliffe, D. (2009). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. In D. Radcliffe, H. Wilson, D. Powell, & & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design (pp. 9–16). Brisbane: University of Queensland and the Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
• Shi, L., & Cui, Y. (1999). Teaching Theories: the Principles, Strategies and Research of Classroom Teaching. Shanghai: East China Normal University Publishing House.
• Shi, Y., Xie, W., Xu, G., Shi, R., Mao, Y., & Liu, F. (2003). Smart Classroom. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(2), 47–55. Retrieved from http://campustechnology.com/Issues/2006/December-2006.aspx
• Spector, J. M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.slejournal.com/content/1/1/2
• Sutherland, R., & Fischer, F. (2014). Future learning spaces: design, collaboration, knowledge, assessment, teachers, technology and the radical past. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.870107
• Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Teo, T. (2013). An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). Computers & Education, 67, 51–57.
• Vaughn, A. L. (2011). The Effectiveness of the International Society for Technology in Education’s Classroom Observation Tool (ICOT) in Evaluating Technology Integration in the Elementary Classroom. Journal of Technology Integration in the Classroom, 4(3), 57–60.
• Wilson, G., & Randall, M. (2012). The implementation and evaluation of a new learning space: a pilot study. Research in Learning Technology, 20(2), 1-17. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14431
• Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2013). Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s40299-012- 0001-9
• Yang, J., & Huang, R. (2015). Development and validation of a scale for evaluating technology-rich classroom environment. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(2). doi:10.1007/s40692-015-0029-y
• Yang, J., Huang, R., & Kinshuk. (2016). The Learning Preferences of Digital Learners in K-12 Schools in China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 1047–1064. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1254a
• Wu, W., Chang, H. H., & Guo, C. C. (2009). The development of an instrument for a technologyintegrated science learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 207–233. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/56m276vj41800113.pdf

APA

Yang, J., Yu, H., Gong, C., & Chen, N.-S. (2017). Students’ Perceptions and Behaviour in Technology-Rich Classroom and Multi-Media Classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 621-647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00636a

Vancouver

Yang J, Yu H, Gong C, Chen NS. Students’ Perceptions and Behaviour in Technology-Rich Classroom and Multi-Media Classroom. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3):621-47. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00636a

AMA

Yang J, Yu H, Gong C, Chen NS. Students’ Perceptions and Behaviour in Technology-Rich Classroom and Multi-Media Classroom. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3), 621-647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00636a

Chicago

Yang, Junfeng, Huiju Yu, Chaohua Gong, and Nian-Shing Chen. "Students’ Perceptions and Behaviour in Technology-Rich Classroom and Multi-Media Classroom". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 3 (2017): 621-647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00636a

Harvard

Yang, J., Yu, H., Gong, C., and Chen, N.-S. (2017). Students’ Perceptions and Behaviour in Technology-Rich Classroom and Multi-Media Classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), pp. 621-647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00636a

MLA

Yang, Junfeng et al. "Students’ Perceptions and Behaviour in Technology-Rich Classroom and Multi-Media Classroom". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, pp. 621-647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00636a