The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy

Hadi Suwono; Lailil Maulidia; Muhammad Saefi; Sentot Kusairi; Chokchai Yuenyong

doi:10.29333/ejmste/11505

Full Text (PDF)

Hadi Suwono ¹ ^* , Lailil Maulidia ¹ , Muhammad Saefi ¹ ² , Sentot Kusairi ³ , Chokchai Yuenyong ⁴

More Detail

¹ Department of Biology, Universitas Negeri Malang, INDONESIA² Department of Biology, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, INDONESIA³ Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Malang, INDONESIA⁴ Science Education Program, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University, THAILAND^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Science teachers are the primary agents in developing students’ scientific literacy. Therefore, it is essential to identify teachers’ perceptions of scientific literacy in order to increase students’ scientific literacy. This study was designed to develop and validate an instrument of Indonesian science teachers’ perceptions of scientific literacy. The questionnaire was developed based on previous research findings and focus group discussions involving six experts. The factors and internal consistency were examined by involving 808 students from various universities in Indonesia. Validity and reliability were tested using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. This study results showed 41 questionnaire items with acceptable internal validity and consistency. The questionnaires are recommended as a measure of the development of perceptions of prospective science teachers.

Keywords

confirmatory factor analysis
development
exploratory factor analysis
science teacher
scientific literacy
validation

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2022, Volume 18, Issue 1, Article No: em2068

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505

Publication date: 09 Jan 2022

Article Views: 2412

Article Downloads: 1420

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Ahmad, S., Zulkurnain, N., & Khairushalimi, F. (2016). Assessing the validity and reliability of a measurement model in structural equation modeling (SEM). British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 15(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2016/25183
Ajayi, V. O. (2018). Scientific literacy. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.13345.92009
Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Fadde, P. J. (2018). Pre-service elementary teachers’ scientific literacy and self-efficacy in teaching science. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.1.02
Alebous, T. (2013). Science teaching and level of the scientific literacy of the primary school teacher in Jordan. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 4(2), 1190-1196. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2013.0167
Al-Jarrah, T. M., Mansor, N., Talafhah, R. H., & Al-Jarrah, J. M. (2014). A review of research into metacognitive strategies in the process of education: Teaching and learning of English skills. International Journal of Current Research, 10(12), 76832-76838. https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.33608.12.2018
Al-Momani, F. N. N. (2016). Assessing the development of scientific literacy among undergraduates college of education. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9405
Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). Comparison of students’ scientific literacy in integrated science learning through model of guided discovery and problem based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 5(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5786
Basam, F., Rusilowati, A., & Ridlo, S. (2017). Analysis of science literacy learning with scientific inquiry approach in increasing science competence of students. Journal of Primary Education, 6(3), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPE.V6I3.21049
Blanco-López, Á., España-Ramos, E., González-García, F. J., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2015). Key aspects of scientific competence for citizenship: A Delphi study of the expert community in Spain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 164-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21188
Brown, H. D. (2002). English language teaching in the “post-method” era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment. In J. C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 9-18). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190.003
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
Cavas, P. H., Ozdem, Y., Cavas, B., Cakiroglu, J., & Ertepinar, H. (2013). Turkish pre-service elementary science teachers’ scientific literacy level and attitudes toward science. Science Education International, 24(4), 383-401.
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S.-W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Contreras, M. E. (2011). The effects of teacher perceptions and expectations on student achievement. University of California.
Davies, R., & Priestley, C. (2017). Landscape survey of science literacy in developing countries: Summary report | Agricultural Information Management Standards (AIMS) [Summary Report]. Network for Information and Digital Access. http://aims.fao.org/activity/blog/landscape-survey-science-literacy-developing-countries-summary-report
DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. SAGE.
DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 440-464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duit, R., & Tesch, M. (2010). On the role of the experiment in science teaching and learning—Visions and the reality of instructional practice. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hands-on Science, 17-30.
Ellis, A. K., Denton, D. W., & Bond, J. B. (2014). An analysis of research on metacognitive teaching strategies. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4015-4024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.883
Faisal, & Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: Past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), Article number 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0
Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 6(1), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245
Fan, Y., Keating, X. D., Liu, J., Zhou, K., Shangguan, R., & Knipe, R. (2018). Development of a scale measuring Chinese preservice physical education teachers’ beliefs about the physical education profession. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(5), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0395-0
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? Health Science Journal, 5(1), 1-14.
Fourianalistyawati, E., Uswatunnisa, A., Mahdiannur, M. A., Saleky, A. P., Soebandhi, S., Reni, A., & Kurniasih, N. (2018). Research development in Indonesia: Ethics committee in open science and collaboration era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012069
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596
Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J. Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (Eds.). (2009). Survey methodology. Wiley.
Hair, J. F. (Ed.). (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hardinata, A., & Permanasari, A. (2017). Development and validation of a scientific literacy test on global warming theme. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.1
Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M. (2018). Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z
Herlanti, Y., Mardiati, Y., Wahyuningtias, R., Mahardini, E., Iqbal, M., & Sofyan, A. (2017). Discovering learning strategy to increase metacognitive knowledge in biology learning in secondary school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 6(1), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9605
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.
Huang, C.-H., Wang, T.-F., Tang, F.-I., Chen, I.-J., & Yu, S. (2017). Development and validation of a quality of life scale for elementary school students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.01.001
Hwang, J., Choi, K. M., Bae, Y., & Shin, D. H. (2018). Do teachers’ instructional practices moderate equity in mathematical and scientific literacy? An investigation of the PISA 2012 and 2015. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(S1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9909-8
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
Khery, Y., Nufida, B. A., Rahayu, S., & Budiasih, E. (2018). Karakteristik nature of science (NOS) dan penerapan teknologi mobile dalam pembelajaran kimia [Characteristics of Nature of Science (NOS) and Application of Mobile Technology in Chemistry Learning]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pembelajarannya 2018 [Proceedings of the 2018 National Chemistry Seminar and Learning], 88-97.
Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315788135
Konokman, G. Y., Yelken, T. Y., Karasolak, K., & Cesur, E. (2017). Teachers’ perception: Competent or not in curriculum development. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 56-73.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
Lelliott, A. (2014). Scientific literacy and the South African school curriculum. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.967935
Liang, L. L., & Yuan, H. (2008). Examining the alignment of Chinese national physics curriculum guidelines and 12th‐grade exit examinations: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1823-1835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701689766
McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2017). Applied multivariate research design and interpretation. SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/applied-multivariate-research/book246895
Mun, K., Shin, N., Lee, H., Kim, S.-W., Choi, K., Choi, S.-Y., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Korean secondary students’ perception of scientific literacy as global citizens: Using global scientific literacy questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1739-1766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045956
Okada, A. (2013). Scientific literacy in the digital age: Tools, environments, and resources for co-inquiry. European Scientific Journal, 4, 263-274. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2013.v9n10p%25p
Ozdem, Y., Cavas, P., Cavas, B., Cakiroglu, J., & Ertepinar, H. (2010). An investigation of elementary student’s scientific literacy levels. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(1), 6-19. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1404740965.pdf
Pahrudin, A., Irwandani, I., Triyana, E., Oktarisa, Y., & Anwar, C. (2019). The analysis of pre-service physics teachers in scientific literacy: Focus on the competence and knowledge aspects. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 8(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.15728
Rahmasiwi, A., Susilo, H., & Suwono, H. (2018). Pengaruh pembelajaran diskusi kelas menggunakan isu sosiosains terhadap literasi sains mahasiswa baru pada kemampuan akademik berbeda [The effect of class discussion learning using socioscience issues on new students’ scientific literacy on different academic abilities]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan [Journal of Education: Theory, Research and Development], 3(8), 980-989. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i8.11373
Ratini, R., Muchtar, H., Suparman, M. A., Tamuri, A. H., & Susanto, E. (2018). The influence of learning models and learning reliance on students’ scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 7(4), 458-466. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.12489
Richards, C. (2012). Policy studies as framework for the renewed role of ethics in science and technology. Philippiniana Sacra, 47(10), 409-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02864.x
Ristanto, R. H., Zubaidah, S., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2017). Scientific literacy of students learned through guided inquiry. International Journal of Research & Review, 4(5), 23-30.
Rohmawati, E., Widodo, W., & Agustini, R. (2018). Membangun kemampuan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran berkonteks socio-scientific issues berbantuan media weblog [Building students’ scientific literacy skills through learning in the context of socio-scientific issues with the help of weblog media]. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA [Science Education Research Journal], 3(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v3n1.p8-14
Roszkowski, M. J., & Soven, M. (2010). Shifting gears: Consequences of including two negatively worded items in the middle of a positively worded questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802618344
Rusilowati, A., Kurniawati, L., & Nugroho, S. E. (2016). Developing an instrument of scientific literacy assessment on the cycle theme. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(12), 5718-5727.
Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., Susilowati, E. S. M., Mustika, T., Harfiyani, N., & Prabowo, H. T. (2018). The development of scientific literacy assessment to measure student’s scientific literacy skills in energy theme. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012046
Sarkar, M., & Corrigan, D. (2014). Promotion of scientific literacy: Bangladeshi teachers’ perspectives and practices. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 162-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.905462
Sartika, D., Kalsum, U., & Arsyad, A. A. (2018). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains mahasiswa program studi pendidikan fisika Universitas Sulawesi Barat [Analysis of the scientific literacy ability of students of the physics education study program at the University of West Sulawesi]. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika [Journal of Physics Education Forum], 3(2), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v3i2.13722
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge.
Seraphin, K. D., Philippoff, J., Kaupp, L., & Vallin, L. M. (2012). Metacognition as means to increase the effectiveness of inquiry-based science education. Science Education International, 23(4), 366-382.
Sharma, O. P. (2015). Ethics in science. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 55(3), 341-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0532-x
Sharp, J. G., Hopkin, R., & Lewthwaite, B. (2011). Teacher perceptions of science in the national curriculum: Findings from an application of the science curriculum implementation questionnaire in English primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2407-2436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550698
Sofiani, D., & Mudzakir, A. (2018). Examining junior high school students’ views of the nature of science and technology. Proceedings of 155th The IIER International Conference, 12-15.
Subiantoro, A. W., Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2015). Promoting socio-scientific issue-based instruction in Indonesia: Biology teachers experiences and perceptions. Proceedings International Conference on Mathematics, Sciences and Education, 93-104.
Sunarti, T. (2015). Pemahaman literasi sains mahasiswa calon guru fisika Universitas Negeri Surabaya [Understanding of scientific literacy of prospective physics teacher students at the State University of Surabaya]. Proseding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pembelajarannya 2015 [Proceedings of the 2015 Physics and Learning National Seminar], 34-39.
Suwono, H., Saefi, M., & Susilo, H. (2019). Challenge based learning to improve scientific literacy of undergraduate biology students. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for Science Educators and Teachers 2018, 030020. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094018
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., Sancho, P., & Lila, M. (2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 299-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.769394
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. ACER Press, Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/aer/3
Wei, B., & Thomas, G. P. (2005). Rationale and approaches for embedding scientific literacy into the new junior secondary school chemistry curriculum in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1477-1493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500154129
Wicaksono, A. G. C., Minarti, I. B., & Roshayanti, F. (2018). Analysis of students’ science motivation and nature of science comprehension in middle school. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia [Indonesian Journal of Biology Education], 4(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5354
Ye, F., & Wallace, T. L. (2014). Psychological sense of school membership scale: Method effects associated with negatively worded items. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(3), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913504816
Yuenyong, C., & Narjaikaew, P. (2009). Scientific literacy and Thailand science education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 335-349.
Zhang, B., Krajcik, J. S., Sutherland, L. M., Wang, L., Wu, J., & Qian, Y. (2005). Opportunities and challenges of China’s inquiry-based education reform in middle and high schools: Perspectives of science teachers and teacher educators. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(4), 477-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-1517-8

How to cite this article

APA

Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505

Vancouver

Suwono H, Maulidia L, Saefi M, Kusairi S, Yuenyong C. The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(1):em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505

AMA

Suwono H, Maulidia L, Saefi M, Kusairi S, Yuenyong C. The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(1), em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505

Chicago

Suwono, Hadi, Lailil Maulidia, Muhammad Saefi, Sentot Kusairi, and Chokchai Yuenyong. "The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 1 (2022): em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505

Harvard

Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., and Yuenyong, C. (2022). The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505

MLA

Suwono, Hadi et al. "The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505