The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation

Muhammad Nasir; Cari Cari; Widha Sunarno; Fitria Rahmawati

doi:10.29333/ejmste/12499

Full Text (PDF)

Muhammad Nasir ¹ ^* , Cari Cari ¹ , Widha Sunarno ¹ , Fitria Rahmawati ¹

More Detail

¹ Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, INDONESIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of STEM-based guided inquiry (STEM-BGI) on light concept understanding and scientific explanation. The design of this research is a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test control group design. The difference in effect between STEM-BGI and guided inquiry design (GID) is analyzed using the one-way MANOVA. The impact of the STEM-BGI on light concept understanding and scientific explanation is analyzed using effect size. The correlation between conceptual understanding and scientific explanation is tested by bivariate correlation analysis. The result of this study indicates that the STEM-BGI learning model is more effective in enhancing light concept understanding than the GID with an effect size coefficient of 0.81 in the high category. The STEM-BGI learning model is more effective in enhancing scientific explanation than the GID with an effect size coefficient of 0.78 in the medium category. There is a positive correlation between understanding the concept and scientific explanation. Mastery concepts and scientific explanations can help students to solve more complex problems using multidisciplinary STEM.

Keywords

effectiveness
guided inquiry
STEM approach
concept understanding
scientific explanation

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2022, Volume 18, Issue 11, Article No: em2175

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499

Publication date: 02 Oct 2022

Article Views: 1602

Article Downloads: 975

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abdi, M. U., Mustafa, M., & Pada, A. U. T. (2021). Penerapan pendekatan STEM berbasis simulasi PhET untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik [Application of the PhET simulation-based STEM approach to improve students’ understanding of physics concepts]. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA [Journal of IPA & IPA Learning], 5(3), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.21774
Abdurrahman, A., Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H., & Ariyani, F. (2019). Design and validation of inquiry-based STEM learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to facilitate gift students facing 21st-century challenges. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.513308
Arini, D. S., Rahayu, S., & Kusairi, S. (2021). Efektivitas learning cycle 3E berkonteks socioscientific issues terhadap pemahaman konsep dan penjelasan ilmiah siswa sekolah dasar [The effectiveness of the 3E learning cycle in the context of socioscientific issues on understanding concepts and scientific explanations for elementary school students]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan [Journal of Education: Theory, Research and Development], 5(11), 1555-1562. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14154
Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The effect of three levels of inquiry on the improvement of science concept understanding of elementary school teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11216a
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Asiksoy, G., & Ozdamli, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a
Badeau, R., White, D. R., Ibrahim, B., Ding, L., & Heckler, A. F. (2017). What works with worked examples: Extending self-explanation and analogical comparison to synthesis problems. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020112
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Nesbit, J. C., Salimi, F., & Winne, P. H. (2018). Inducing self-explanation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 703-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9434-x
Cari, C., Nasir, M., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). Flipped classroom using e-module to improve understanding of light concepts: Needs analysis of e-module development to empower scientific explanation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012040
Chang, C. C., Yeh, T. K., & Shih, C. M. (2016). The effects of integrating computer-based concept mapping for physics learning in junior high school. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2531-2542. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1284a
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher education: Understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300
Etkina, E., Warren, A., & Gentile, M. (2006). The role of models in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 44(1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2150757
Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. Physics Education Research Conference, 8(1), 1-14.
Hsu, C. C., Chiu, C. H., Lin, C. H., & Wang, T. I. (2015). Enhancing skill in constructing scientific explanations using a structured argumentation scaffold in scientific inquiry. Computers & Education, 91, 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.009
Ikhwanuddin, Jaedun, A., & Purwantoro, dan D. (2010). Problem solving dalam pembelajaran fisika untuk meningkatkan kemampuan mahasiswa berpikir analitis [Problem solving in physics learning to improve students’ analytical thinking skills]. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran [Journal of Education: Learning Innovation Research], 40(2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v40i2.500
Jackson, C. D., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. J. (2018). Increasing STEM literacy via an informal learning environment. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 53(1), 4.https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE53.1Jackson
Jackson, J., Dukerich, L., & Hestenes, D. (2008). Modeling instruction: An effective model for science education. Science Educator, 17(1), 10-17.
Johns, G., & Mentzer, N. (2016). STEM integration through design and inquiry. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(3), 13.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Luangrath, P., Pettersson, S., & Benckert, S. (2011). On the use of two versions of the force concept inventory to test conceptual understanding of mechanics in Lao PDR. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(2), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75184
Maniotes, L. K., & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2014). Making the shift: from traditional research assignments to guiding inquiry learning. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 8-17.
McDaniel, M. A., Stoen, S. M., Frey, R. F., Markow, Z. E., Hynes, K. M., Zhao, J., & Cahill, M. J. (2016). Dissociative conceptual and quantitative problem-solving outcomes across interactive engagement and traditional format introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020141. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020141
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientiﬁc explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
Mehring, J., & Leis, A. (2018). Innovations in flipping the language classroom: Theories and practices. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6968-0
Napsawati, N. (2020). Analisis situasi pembelajaran IPA fisika dengan metode daring di tengah wabah COVID-19 [Analysis of the situation of learning physics science with online methods in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak]. Karst: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapannya [Karst: Journal of Physics Education and Its Applications], 3(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v3i1.546
Nasir, M., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2021). Article diagnostic difficulties and misconceptions of light refraction: A need analysis learning abstract concepts using PhET simulation. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (pp. 317-322). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211215.056
Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Educational design research: The value of variety. In S. McKenney, N. Nieveen, J. J. H. Akker, & K. Gravemeijer (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 163-170). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364
Nurdiansah, D., Suhandi, A., & Efendi, R. (2021). Analogy supported-scientific explanation text to improve high school student’s understanding of the concept of heat transfer. In Proceedings of the 6^th Asia-Pacific Education and Science Conference (p. 106). European Alliance for Innovation. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-12-2020.2309126
Oktavianti, E., Handayanto, S. K., Wartono, W., & Saniso, E. (2018). Students’ scientific explanation in blended physics learning with e-scaffolding. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 7(2), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14232
Palupi, B. S., & Subiyantoro, S. (2020). The effectiveness of guided inquiry learning (GIL) and problem-based learning (PBL) for explanatory writing skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 713-730. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13146a
Park, M. (2019). Effects of simulation-based formative assessments on students’ conceptions in physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1722. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103586
Parno, Yuliati, L., Munfaridah, N., Ali, M., Indrasari, N., & Rosyidah, F. U. N. (2020). The impact of STEM-based guided inquiry learning on students’ scientific literacy in the topic of fluid statics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1482(1), 012104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012104
Putri, F. M (2015). Pengaruh penerapan kombinasi metode inquiri dan reciprocal teaching terhadap capaian pemahaman konsep siswa [The effect of the application of a combination of inquiry and reciprocal teaching methods on the achievement of students’ conceptual understanding]. Jurnal Edusains [Journal of Education], 7(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i1.1394
Redish, E. F. (2005). Changing student ways of knowing: What should our students learn in a physics class? In Proceedings of World View on Physics Education (pp. 1-13).
Riduwan, M. B. A. (2016). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian [Measurement scale of research variables]. Alfabeta.
Saputra, M. E. A., & Mujib, M. (2018). Efektivitas model flipped classroom menggunakan video pembelajaran matematika terhadap pemahaman konsep [The effectiveness of the flipped classroom model using mathematics learning videos on understanding concepts]. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika [Decimal: Journal of Mathematics], 1(2), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i2.2389
Sasmita, P. R., & Hartoyo, Z. (2020). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran STEM project-based learning terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa [Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran STEM project-based learning terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa]. Silampari Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Fisika [Silampari Journal of Physical Science Education], 2(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.31540/sjpif.v2i2.1081
Suhandi, A., Sinaga, P., Kaniawati, I., & Suhendi, E. (2009). Efektivitas penggunaan media simulasi virtual pada pendekatan pembelajaran konseptual interaktif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan meminimalkan miskonsepsi [The effectiveness of using virtual simulation media in interactive conceptual learning approaches in increasing concept understanding and minimizing misconceptions]. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA [Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Teaching], 13(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v13i1.304
Sujarwanto, E. (2019). Pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan penyelesaian masalah dalam pembelajaran fisika [Concept understanding and problem-solving skills in physics learning]. Diffraction, 1(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v1i1.806
Sulistiyono, S. (2021). Efektivitas model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan pemahaman konsep fisika siswa Ma Riyadhus Solihin [The effectiveness of the guided inquiry learning model on the science process skills and understanding of the physics concepts of Ma Riyadhus Solihin students]. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha [Journal of Physics Education Undiksha], 10(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpf.v10i2.27826
Tekeng, S. N. Y. (2015). Using a self-explanation strategy to improve students’ understanding of the to-be-learned material. Auladuna, 2(2), 173-184.
Vennix, J., den Brok, P., & Taconis, R. (2018). Do outreach activities in secondary STEM education motivate students and improve their attitudes towards STEM? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1263-1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1473659
von Aufschnaiter, C., & Rogge, C. (2010). Misconceptions or missing conceptions? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75223
Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of students’ problem-solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching physics using PhET simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225-227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3361987
Yanda, K. O., Jumroh, J., & Octaria, D. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa [The effect of the inquiry learning model on the ability to understand concepts in terms of students’ learning motivation]. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika [Indiktika: Journal of Mathematics Education Innovation], 2(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v2i1.3428
Yang, H. T., & Wang, K. H. (2014). A teaching model for scaffolding 4th-grade students’ scientific explanation writing. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9392-8
Yulaikah, I., Rahayu, S., & Parlan, P. (2022). Efektivitas pembelajaran STEM dengan model PjBL terhadap kreativitas dan pemahaman konsep IPA siswa sekolah dasar [The effectiveness of STEM learning with the PjBL model on creativity and understanding of science concepts for elementary school students]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan [Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development], 7(6), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i6.15275
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008

How to cite this article

APA

Nasir, M., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), em2175. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499

Vancouver

Nasir M, Cari C, Sunarno W, Rahmawati F. The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(11):em2175. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499

AMA

Nasir M, Cari C, Sunarno W, Rahmawati F. The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(11), em2175. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499

Chicago

Nasir, Muhammad, Cari Cari, Widha Sunarno, and Fitria Rahmawati. "The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 11 (2022): em2175. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499

Harvard

Nasir, M., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., and Rahmawati, F. (2022). The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), em2175. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499

MLA

Nasir, Muhammad et al. "The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 11, 2022, em2175. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499