• Adams, R., & Wu, M. (2010). Notes and tutorial Conquest: Multidimensional model. Retrieved from https://www.acer.org/conquest/notes-tutorials.
• Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Kelley, K. (2012). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science. Science Education, 96(5), 763-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21018.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman.
• Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4.
• BPS [Badan Pusat Statistik/ Statistics Indonesia]. (2013). Penduduk Menurut Wilayah dan Agama yang Dianut. Retrieved March 10, 2017, from http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/tabel?tid=321.
• Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955-970. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20249.
• Bybee, R.W. (2012). Scientific literacy in environmental and health education. In Zeyer, A., & Kyburz-Graber, R. (pp. 49-67). Science Environment Health. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3949-1_4.
• Cavas, P. (2011). Factors Affecting the Motivation of Turkish Primary Students for Science Learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31-42.
• Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7.
• Chiu, M. M., & Xihua, Z. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.06.003.
• Dalgety, J., & Coll, R. K. (2006). Exploring first-year science students’ chemistry self-efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-1080-3.
• DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598713.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Elliot, A. J., & Moller, A. C. (2003). Performance-approach goals: Good or bad forms of regulation? International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.003.
• Fisher, W. P. (2008). The cash value of reliability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 22(1), 1160-1163.
• Fortus, D. (2014). Attending to affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21155.
• Galton, M. (2009). Moving to secondary school: Initial encounters and their effects. Perspectives on Education (Primary Secondary Transfer in Science), 2, 5–21.
• Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and non-science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442.
• Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267.
• Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3.
• Graham, S., & Taylor, A. Z. (2002). Ethnicity, gender, and the development of achievement values. In J. S. Eccles, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), A volume in the educational psychology series. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50007-3.
• Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. S. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1305543.
• Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20045.
• Jones, R. (2013). Education Reform in Korea. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1067. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k43nxs1t9vh-en.
• Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analytic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 443-471. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004443.
• Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131-155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3.
• Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 75-102). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Larson, R., Dworkin, J., & Gillman, S. (2001). Facilitating adolescents’ constructive use of time in one-parent families. Applied Developmental Science, 5(3), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0503_3.
• Lau, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0802_04.
• Lee, C. S., Hayes, K. N., Seitz, J., DiStefano, R., & O’Connor, D. (2016). Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 192-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452.
• Lee, E. (2012). From gender to human resource: The growth of Korean policy for women in science & technology and its limit. Gender and Culture, 5(2), 7-35.
• Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth‐grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 303-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<303::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-X.
• Leigh, A., & Van der Eng, P. (2009). Inequality in Indonesia: What can we learn from top incomes? Journal of Public Economics, 93(1), 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.005.
• Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.
• Libao, N. J. P., Sagun, J. J. B., Tamangan, E. A., Pattalitan, A. P., Dupa, M. E. D., & Bautista, R. G. (2016). Science learning motivation as correlate of students’ academic performances. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(3), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.231.
• Linacre, J. M. (2012). A user’s guide to Winsteps Ministeps Rasch-model computer programs [version 3.74.0]. Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com/winsteps.htm.
• Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385.
• Martyn, E. (2005). The woman's movement in post-colonial Indonesia. New York, NY: Routledge Curzon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299197.
• Mason, L. Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ronconi, L. (2012). Besides knowledge: A cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41(1), 49-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0.
• McHale, S. M., Shanahan, L., Updegraff, K. A., Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2004). Developmental and individual differences in girls’ sex‐typed activities in middle childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 75(5), 1575-1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00758.x.
• Meece, J. L., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2001). Introduction: The schooling of ethnic minority children and youth. Educational Psychologist, 36(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3601_1.
• Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258.
• Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.
• Ministry of Education. (2015). The 2015 Revised Science Curriculum (Report No. 2015-74). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. Chesnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
• Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S. & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in student’smathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475–1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12036.
• Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., & Suh, J. (2013). Students’ images of scientists and doing science: An international comparison study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(2), 115-129.
• Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G. Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067-1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863.
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2017). Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933560149.
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199.
• Palmer, D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853-1881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339654.
• Parker, L. (2017). Religious environmental education? The new school curriculum in Indonesia. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1249-1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1150425.
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
• Pulfre, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2011). Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 683-700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023911.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
• Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Eds.), The Oxford Handook of Human Motivation (pp. 13-27). NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0002.
• Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Seth, M. J. (2002). Education fever: society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
• Shin, S., Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2017). Influence of career motivation on science learning in Korean high-school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a.
• Song, J., & Kim, K. S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: the images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290255.
• Tang, M., & Neber, H. (2008). Motivation and self‐regulated science learning in high‐achieving students: differences related to nation, gender, and grade‐level. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130802503959.
• UNESCO (2015). A Complex Formula: Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO.
• UNICEF. (2001). The state of the world’s children 2001. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/sowc01/.
• Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.003.
• Vedder‐Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20398.
• Vedder‐Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: A follow‐up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21049.
• Vedder‐Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2013). School, teacher, peers, and parents’ goals emphases and adolescents’ motivation to learn science in and out of school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 952-988. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21103.
• Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Motivation in education. In R. C. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Motivation (pp.463-478). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0026.
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
• Zeyer, A. (2018). Gender, complexity, and science for all: Systemizing and its impact on motivation to learn science for different science subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 147-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21413.
• Zeyer, A., Çetin‐Dindar, A., Md Zain, A. N., Juriševič, M., Devetak, I., & Odermatt, F. (2013). Systemizing: A cross‐cultural constant for motivation to learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1047-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21101.

APA

Rachmatullah, A., Roshayanti, F., Shin, S., Lee, J.-K., & Ha, M. (2018). The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3123-3141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665

Vancouver

Rachmatullah A, Roshayanti F, Shin S, Lee JK, Ha M. The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(7):3123-41. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665

AMA

Rachmatullah A, Roshayanti F, Shin S, Lee JK, Ha M. The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(7), 3123-3141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665

Chicago

Rachmatullah, Arif, Fenny Roshayanti, Sein Shin, Jun-Ki Lee, and Minsu Ha. "The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 7 (2018): 3123-3141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665

Harvard

Rachmatullah, A., Roshayanti, F., Shin, S., Lee, J.-K., and Ha, M. (2018). The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), pp. 3123-3141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665

MLA

Rachmatullah, Arif et al. "The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 7, 2018, pp. 3123-3141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665