Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., M. Ameen, B. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
• Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031
• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
• Anggraini, T. E., Ahmad, M., & Hanafi, I. (2024). Digital literacy and teaching experience as predictors of pedagogical competence in the digital era. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(2), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v10i02.10795
• Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
• Bauer, E., Heitzmann, N., Bannert, M., Chernikova, O., Fischer, M. R., Frenzel, A. C., Gartmeier, M., Hofer, S. I., Holzberger, D., Kasneci, E., Koenen, J., Kosel, C., Küchemann, S., Kuhn, J., Michaeli, T., Neuhaus, B. J., Niklas, F., Obersteiner, A., Pfeffer, J., ... Fischer, F. (2025). Personalizing simulation-based learning in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 122, Article 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102746
• Becker, S., Bruckermann, T., Finger, A., Huwer, J., Kremser, E., Meier, M., Thoms, L.-J., Thyssen, C., & von Kotzebue, L. (2020). Orientierungsrahmen Digitale Kompetenzen für das Lehramt in den Naturwissenschaften - DiKoLAN Plus. In S. Becker, J. Meßinger-Koppelt, & C. Thyssen (Eds.), Digitale basiskompetenzen – Orientierungshilfe und praxisbeispiele für die universitäre lehramtsausbildung in den naturwissenschaften (pp. 14-43). Joachim Herz Stiftung.
• Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008018
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
• Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
• Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004445
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
• Dolmans, D. H. J. M., & Tigelaar, D. (2012). Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE guide no. 60. Medical Teacher, 34(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595437
• Dresing, T., & Pehl, T. (2018). Praxisbuch Interview, Transkription & Analyse. Anleitungen und Regelsysteme für qualitativ Forschende. Eigenverlag.
• Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4
• Enochsson, A.-B., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in initial teacher training: Research review. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/220502872611
• Finkelstein, N., Adams, W., Keller, C., Perkins, K., Wieman, C., & the PhET Team. (2006). High-tech tools for teaching physics: The physics education technology project. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 110-121.
• Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002
• Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001
• Große-Heilmann, R., Riese, J., Burde, J.-P., Schubatzky, T., & Weiler, D. (2022). Fostering pre-service physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge regarding digital media. Education Sciences, 12(7), Article 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070440
• Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., & Hopf, M. (2020). Design-based research as a model for systematic curriculum development: The example of a curriculum for introductory optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), Article 020152. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020152
• Henne, A., Möhrke, P., Thoms, L.-J., & Huwer, J. (2022). Implementing digital competencies in university science education seminars following the DiKoLAN framework. Education Sciences, 12(5), Article 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050356
• Hessen, B. T. E., Hewary, O. A., & Fileen, N. G. (2026). When artificial intelligence meets blended learning: A quasi-experimental study of physics achievement at the University of Khartoum, Sudan. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v12i01.11360
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
• Janssen, N., Knoef, M. J., & Lazonder, A. W. (2019). Technological and pedagogical support for pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1569554
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology and Society, 21(3), 48-59.
• Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between scientific attitudes and science process skills toward technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.600979
• Kerres, M. (2012). Mediendidaktik: Konzeption und Entwicklung Mediengestützter Lernangebote. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486716924
• Kerres, M. (2022). Mediendidaktik. In U. Sander, F. von Gross, & K.-U. Hugger (Eds.), Handbuch Medienpädagogik (pp. 105-114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23578-9_12
• Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Smits, A., Tondeur, J., & Voogt, J. (2023). Strategies for developing digital competencies in teachers: Towards a multidimensional synthesis of qualitative data (SQD) survey instrument. Computers & Education, 193, Article 104674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104674
• Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716-725. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716
• Lhotzky, J. F. (2023). Relevanzwahrnehmung und Akzeptanz für den Einsatz digitaler Medien und Technologien im eigenen Unterricht: Beforschung Studierender innerhalb der physikdidaktischen Ausbildung des neu entwickelten Lehr-Lern-Labors im Studiengang Master of Education Physik [PhD thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz].
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
• Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903657
• Mayer, P., & Girwidz, R. (2019). Physics teachers’ acceptance of multimedia applications—adaptation of the technology acceptance model to investigate the influence of TPACK on physics teachers’ acceptance behavior of multimedia applications. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00073
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4
• Meier, M., Thyssen, C., Kremser, E., Thoms, L.-J., Becker-Genschow, S., Bruckermann, T., Finger, A., Huwer, J., & von Kotzebue, L. (2020). Grid – Kompetenzraster zur Selbsteinschätzung naturwissenschaftsspezifischer digitaler Lehrkompetenz: Selbsteinschätzungsinstrument zu fünf DiKoLAN-Kompetenzbereichen (deutsche Version, Stand 2020). DiKoLAN. https://dikolan.de
• Meinhardt, C., Rabe, T., & Krey, O. (2018). Formulierung eines evidenzbasierten Validitätsarguments am Beispiel der Erfassung physikdidaktischer Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen mit einem neu entwickelten Instrument. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 24(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-018-0079-6
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
• Oh, E., & Reeves, T. C. (2010). The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners. Educational Media International, 47(4), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2010.535326
• Platte, A., Enderle, C., & Melzer, C. (2024). Partizipative Forschung mit dem Design-Based Research Ansatz - Gemeinsame Entwicklung eines Konzepts von Organisationsformen im sonderpädagogischen Schwerpunkt Emotionale und soziale Entwicklung. ESE, 6(6), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.35468/6103-04
• Prediger, S., Gravemeijer, K., & Confrey, J. (2015). Design research with a focus on learning processes: An overview on achievements and challenges. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 877-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0722-3
• Priemer, B., & Roth, J. (Eds.). (2020). Lehr-Lern-Labore: Konzepte und deren Wirksamkeit in der MINT-Lehrpersonenbildung. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58913-7
• Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
• Rehfeldt, D., Klempin, C., Brämer, M., Seibert, D., Rogge, I., Lücke, M., Sambanis, M., Nordmeier, V., & Köster, H. (2020). Empirische Forschung in Lehr-Lern-Labor-Seminaren - Ein Systematic Review zu Wirkungen des Lehrformats. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 34(3-4), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000270
• Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2010). Empirische Erkenntnisse zur Struktur professioneller Handlungskompetenz von angehenden Physiklehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften: ZfDN, 16, 167-187. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:31669
• Schmiedebach, M., & Claas, M. (2021). Design-based Research als Ansatz zur Lösung praxisrelevanter Probleme in der fachdidaktischen Forschung. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 27(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.25539/bildungsforschun.v0i2.413
• Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
• Schubatzky, T., Burde, J.-P., Große-Heilmann, R., Lachner, A., Riese, J., & Weiler, D. (2025). From knowledge to intention: The role of TPACK and self-efficacy in technology integration. Computers and Education Open, 8, Article 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100246
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
• The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
• Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
• Tondeur, J., Trevisan, O., Howard, S. K., & Van Braak, J. (2025). Preparing preservice teachers to teach with digital technologies: An update of effective SQD-strategies. Computers & Education, 232, 105262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105262
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
• Veith, J. M., Bitzenbauer, P., & Girnat, B. (2022). Towards describing student learning of abstract algebra: Insights into learners’ cognitive processes from an acceptance survey. Mathematics, 10(7), Article 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071138
• von Aufschnaiter, C., Cappell, J., Dübbelde, G., Ennemoser, M., Mayer, J., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Sträßer, R., & Wolgast, A. (2015). Diagnostische Kompetenz. Theoretische Überlegungen zu einem zentralen Konstrukt der Lehrerbildung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 61(5), 738-758.
• von Kotzebue, L., Meier, M., Finger, A., Kremser, E., Huwer, J., Thoms, L.-J., Becker, S., Bruckermann, T., & Thyssen, C. (2021). The framework DiKoLAN (digital competencies for teaching in science education) as basis for the self-assessment tool DiKoLAN – Grid. Education Sciences, 11(12), Article 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120775
• Weiler, D., Burde, J.-P., Große-Heilmann, R., Lachner, A., Riese, J., & Schubatzky, T. (2023). Förderung von digitalisierungsbezogenen Kompetenzen von angehenden Physiklehrkräften mit dem SQD-Modell im Projekt DiKoLeP. In M. Meier, G. Greefrath, M. Hammann, R. Wodzinski, & K. Ziepprecht (Eds.), Lehr-Lern-Labore und Digitalisierung (pp. 47-62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40109-2_4
• Weiler, D., Burde, J.-P., Große-Heilmann, R., Lachner, A., Riese, J., & Schubatzky, T. (2024). Evaluation of a university seminar on the use of digital media in the physics classroom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2750, Article 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2750/1/012041
• Wieman, C. E., & Perkins, K. K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics Today, 58(11), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2155756
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

APA

Schmid, J. M., Lhotzky, J. F., Veith, J., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2026). The teaching-learning lab Digi-Space: A design-based research pilot on digital media integration in pre-service physics teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(10), em2928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19400

Vancouver

Schmid JM, Lhotzky JF, Veith J, Bitzenbauer P. The teaching-learning lab Digi-Space: A design-based research pilot on digital media integration in pre-service physics teacher education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(10):em2928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19400

AMA

Schmid JM, Lhotzky JF, Veith J, Bitzenbauer P. The teaching-learning lab Digi-Space: A design-based research pilot on digital media integration in pre-service physics teacher education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(10), em2928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19400

Chicago

Schmid, Judith Maria, Johannes F. Lhotzky, Joaquin Veith, and Philipp Bitzenbauer. "The teaching-learning lab Digi-Space: A design-based research pilot on digital media integration in pre-service physics teacher education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 10 (2026): em2928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19400

Harvard

Schmid, J. M., Lhotzky, J. F., Veith, J., and Bitzenbauer, P. (2026). The teaching-learning lab Digi-Space: A design-based research pilot on digital media integration in pre-service physics teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(10), em2928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19400

MLA

Schmid, Judith Maria et al. "The teaching-learning lab Digi-Space: A design-based research pilot on digital media integration in pre-service physics teacher education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 10, 2026, em2928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19400