Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study

Ramazan Yirci; Turgut Karakose; Harun Uygun; Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

Full Text (PDF)

Ramazan Yirci ¹ ^* , Turgut Karakose ², Harun Uygun ³, Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir ⁴

More Detail

¹ Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, TURKEY² Dumlupinar University, TURKEY³ Mersus Group, TURKEY⁴ Firat University, Faculty of Education, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to adapt the Mentoring Relationship Effectiveness Scale to Turkish, and to conduct validity and reliability tests regarding the scale. The study group consisted of 156 university science students receiving graduate education. Construct validity and factor structure of the scale was analyzed first through exploratory factor analysis, then with confirmatory factor analysis. One item was deleted from the scale after the exploratory factor analysis and the scale was observed in its original one dimensional form. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the one dimensional model of the scale was acceptable. Reliability of the scale was examined with test-retest and internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha) methods. The internal consistency coefficient for the whole scale was 0.936. The reliability coefficient for the test-retest, which was carried out two weeks apart, was 0.89. The findings suggest that Mentoring Relationship Effectiveness Scale is sufficiently reliable and valid for science education of graduate students.

Keywords

mentorship
graduate student
science education
validity
reliability

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 4, 821-832

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

Publication date: 17 Jun 2016

Article Views: 1864

Article Downloads: 905

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Aytac, M., & Ongen, B. (2012). The structure of environmental attidutes: First-order confirmatory factor analysis. Istatistikciler Dergisi, 5, 14-22.
Bakioglu, A. (2013). Mentoring in Education. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
Bakioglu, A., & Hacifazlioglu, O. (2000). Education supervisors and mentoring. Marmara University, Atatürk Faculty of Education. Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 39- 49.
Berk, R. A., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss, B., & Yeo, T. P. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 66-71.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications.
Buell, C. (2004). Models of mentoring in communication. Communication Education, 53(1), 56- 73.
Bullis, C., & Bach, B. W. (1989). Are mentor relationships helping organizations? An exploration of developing mentee‐mentor‐organizational identifications using turning point analysis. Communication Quarterly, 37(3), 199-213.
Bulus, M. (2001). People Perception Scale for pre-service teachers: Reliability and validity study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 5, 29.
Buyukozturk, S. (2002). Factor analysis: Basic concepts and using to development scale. Educational Administration Theory and Practice, 32(32), 470-483.
Buyukozturk, S. (2010). Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Cakir, L., & Kocabas, I. (2016). Mentoring in Gifted Student’s Education and a Model Suggestion. Educational Process: International Journal, 5(1), 76-90.
Campbell, C. M., Smith, M., Dugan, J. P., & Komives, S. R. (2012). Mentors and college student leadership outcomes: The importance of position and process. The Review of Higher Education, 35(4), 595-625.
Chao, G. T. (1997). Mentoring phases and outcomes. Journal of vocational behavior, 51(1), 15- 28.
Clutterbuck, D. (1985). Everyone needs a mentor: How to foster talent within the organization. London: Institute of Personnel Management.
Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525-545.
Cunningham, S. (1999). The nature of workplace mentoring relationships among faculty members in Christian higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(4), 441-463.
Dag, I. (2002). Locus of control scale: Scale development, reliability and validity study. Turkish Psychological Journal, 17(49), 77-92.
Deniz, K. Z. (2007). The adaptation of psychological scales. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(1), 1-16.
Dogan, T., & Totan, T. (2010). A new inventory for assessing cognitions in social phobia: The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the social thoughts and beliefs scale. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1), 504-520.
Ensher, A., & Murphy, S. E. (2005). Power mentoring how successful mentors and protégés get the most out of their relationships. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fowler, J. L., & O'Gorman, J. G. (2005). Mentoring functions: A contemporary view of the perceptions of mentees and mentors. British journal of Management, 16(1), 51-57.
Haggard, D. L., Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Wilbanks, J. E. (2011). Who is a mentor? A review of evolving definitions and implications for research. Journal of Management, 37(1), 280-304.
Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.). (2004). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Jersey: Psychology Press.
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45(1-3), 153-171.
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Association of Test Publishers, 1(1), 1-13.
Harrington, D. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis. London: Oxford University Press.
Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264-288.
Karakose, T. (2007). High school teachers’ perceptions regarding principals’ ethical leadership in Turkey. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 464-477.
Karakose, T. (2008). The Perceptions of Primary School Teachers on Principal Cultural Leadership Behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 569-579.
Karakose, T., Yirci, R., & Kocabas, I. (2014). A Qualitative Study of the Novice Principals ‘problems in the School Management Process and Solutions. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 30(6), 1365-1378.
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Lee, L. M., & Bush, T. (2003). Student mentoring in higher education: Hong Kong Baptist University. Mentoring & Tutoring, 11(3), 263-271.
Miller, A. (2004). Mentoring students and young people: A handbook of effective practice. London: Routledge.
Moses, Y. T. (1989). Black Women in Academe: issues and strategies. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED311817. Accessed on 14.01.2015 (1989).
Oguz, A., & Ataseven, N. (2016). The Relationship Between Metacognitive Skills and Motivation of University Students. Educational Process: International Journal, 5(1), 54-64.
OSYM (2015). Number of students by education area. http://www.osym.gov.tr/dosya/169415/h/23ogretimalanlisansustu.pdf. Accessed on: 18.02.2015 (2015).
Ozdamar, K. (2004). Statistical data analysis with package programs. Eskisehir: Kaan Bookstore.
Ozdemir, T. Y., & Ozan, M. B. (2013). The effects of e-mentorship process on mentee achievement. Bartin University Journal of. Faculty of Education, 2, 170-186.
Ozen, H. (2016). Determining the Factors of Social Phobia Levels of University Students: A Logistic Regression Analysis. Educational Process: International Journal, 5(1), 38-53.
Ozkalp, E., Kirel, C., Sungur, Z., & Cengiz, A. A. (2006). The Importance of Mentoring on Organizational Socialization of the Research Assistants in Anadolu University. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 55-70.
Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (2007). The Handbook of Mentoring at Work: Theory, Research and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Roberts, A. (2000). Mentoring revisited: A phenomenological reading of the literature. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(2), 145-170.
Stanley, C. A., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Cross-race faculty mentoring. Change. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(2), 44-50.
Swap, W., Leonard, D., Shields, M., & Abrams, L. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 95-114.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statics. New York: Pearson Education.
Tavsancil, E. (2002). Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
Tenenbaum, H. R., Crosby, F. J., & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 326-341.
Valadez, J. R., & Duran, R.P. (1991). Mentoring in higher education. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, and April. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED331451. Accessed on 14.01.2015
Yirci, R., & Kocabas, I. (2010). The importance of mentoring for school principals: A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 2(5), 1-7.

How to cite this article

APA

Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Uygun, H., & Ozdemir, T. Y. (2016). Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

Vancouver

Yirci R, Karakose T, Uygun H, Ozdemir TY. Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(4):821-32. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

AMA

Yirci R, Karakose T, Uygun H, Ozdemir TY. Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(4), 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

Chicago

Yirci, Ramazan, Turgut Karakose, Harun Uygun, and Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir. "Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 4 (2016): 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

Harvard

Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Uygun, H., and Ozdemir, T. Y. (2016). Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), pp. 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

MLA

Yirci, Ramazan et al. "Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 4, 2016, pp. 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a