Types of formative feedback provided by technology teachers during practical assessment tasks

Nelé Loubser; Willem Rauscher; Nicolaas Blom

doi:10.29333/ejmste/14586

Full Text (PDF)

Nelé Loubser ¹ , Willem Rauscher ¹ ^* , Nicolaas Blom ²

More Detail

¹ University of Pretoria, Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA² University of Limerick, Limerick, IRELAND^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Technology learners require formative feedback from their teachers to aid them in structuring and solving design problems. Without such feedback, learners often do not explore sub-problems and are inclined to reproduce known and existing solutions. Due to a paucity of literature on formative feedback in technology classrooms, this study investigated the formative feedback types that teachers provide to learners during the problem-structuring and problem-solving phases. A qualitative case study design was employed to investigate such feedback from five technology teachers who supported their learners in solving ill-structured design problems. The findings indicate that teachers’ formative feedback consists predominantly of low-level questions, while generative design questions and low-level comments were the least observed. A deeper understanding of how formative feedback unfolds in a technology classroom may help teachers guide learners through problem structuring and solving. Further research is needed to determine the influence of formative feedback on learners’ design outcomes.

Keywords

formative feedback
problem-solving
problem structuring
technology education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2024, Volume 20, Issue 6, Article No: em2448

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14586

Publication date: 01 Jun 2024

Online publication date: 07 May 2024

Article Views: 380

Article Downloads: 165

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ahmed, S., Wallace, K., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0023-z
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to research in education. Cengage.
Aurisicchio, M., & Bracewell, R. (2009). Guiding engineering design activities through a question-based approach. In Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 1-11). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2009-87590
Cardella, M., Buzzanell, P., Cummings, A., Tolbert, D., & Zoltowski, C. (2014). A tale of two design contexts: Quantitative and qualitative explorations of student-instructor interactions admist ambiguity. DTRS 10: Design thinking research symposium, 2014. Perdue University.
Cardoso, C., Eris, O., Badke-Schaub, P., & Aurisicchio, M. (2014). Question asking in design reviews: How does inquiry facilitate the learning interaction? In Proceedings of the Design Thinking Research Symposium (pp. 1-18).
Creeger, S., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. (2019). Exploring the problem space with problem exploration strategies. https://iasdr2019.org/uploads/files/Proceedings/th-f-1388-Cre-S.pdf
Creswell, J. W., Ebersohn, L., Eloff, I., Ferreira, R., Ivankova, N. V., Jansen, J. D., Nieuwenhuis, J., Pietersen, J., Plano Clark, V., & van der Westuizen, C. (2016). First steps in research (Ed. K. Maree, 2nd edn.). Van Schaik Publishers.
Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
Daly, S. R., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J. L., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2019). Design heuristics in engineering concept generation. In D. Schaefer, G. Coates, & C. Eckert (Eds.), Design education today: Technical contexts, programs, and best practices (pp. 601-629). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01121.x
Dannels, D. P., & Martin, K. N. (2008). Critiquing critiques: A genre analysis of feedback across novice to expert design studios. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(2), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907311923
DBE. (2012). Curriculum and assessment policy statement grades 7-9 technology. Department of Basic Education.
Dorst, K. (2019a). Co-evolution and emergence in design. Design Studies, 65, 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.005
Dorst, K. (2019b). Design beyond design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.05.001
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process. Design Studies, 22, 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
Engelbrecht, W., Ankiewicz, P., & de Swart, E. (2007). An industry-sponsored, school focused model for continuing professional development of technology teachers. South African Journal of Education, 2(27), 579-595.
Eris, O. (2004). Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8943-7
Eris, O., Sheppard, S., & Kwan, A. (2007). Learning to question: A longitudinal analysis of question asking behavior and engagement in project-based learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (pp. 1-6).
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought (1st ed.). The MIT Press.
Goel, V. (2014). Creative brains: Designing in the real world. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00241
Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395-429. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1603_3
Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2019). Visible learning feedback. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485480
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Haupt, G. (2015). Learning from experts: Fostering extended thinking in the early phases of the design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 483–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9295-7
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847527
Murray, J. K., McKilligan, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C., & Studer, J. A. (2018a). Innovative solutions through innovated problems. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 695-707.
Murray, J. K., Studer, J. A., Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., Seifert, C. M. (2018b). Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), 248-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20263
Neuman, K. E. (2003). The importance of redesign. Technology Teacher, 63(3), 7-9.
Schut, A., Klapwijk, R., & Gielen, M. (2018). Effects of convergent and divergent feedback on creative thinking during children’s design processes. In N. Seery, J. Buckley, D. Canty, & J. Phelan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference: Research and Practice in Technology Education: Perspectives on Human Capacity and Development (pp. 506-512). Delft University of Technology.
Schut, A., Klapwijk, R., Gielen, M., & de Vries, M. (2019). Children’s responses to divergent and convergent design feedback. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 24(2), 67-89.
Schut, A., van Mechelen, M., Gielen, M., & de Vries, M. J. (2020). Towards constructive design feedback dialogues: Guiding peer and client feedback to simulate children’s creative thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 99-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09612-y
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
Stables, K. (2017). Talking with avatars: The potential and impact of design dialogue with an on-screen avatar on the development of learner’s design and technology project work. In S. Warner, & L. Litowitz (Eds.), In Proceedings of the Technology & Engineering Education (pp. 1-13). PATT.
Stables, K., Kimble, R., Wheeler, T., & Derrick, K. (2016). Lighting the blue touch paper: Design talk that provokes learners to thinking more deeply and broadly about their project work. In Proceedings of the Technology Education for 21^st Century Skills (pp. 1-13).
Tawfik, A. A., Graesser, A., Gatewood, J., & Gishbaugher, J. (2020). Role of questions in inquiry-based instruction: Towards a design taxonomy for question-asking and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 653-678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09738-9
van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(Pt 2), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02073.x
Visser, W. (2009). Design: One, but in different forms. Design Studies, 30(2009), 187-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.11.004
Yilmaz, S., & Daly, S. R. (2014). Influences of feedback interventions on student concept generation and development practices. In Design Thinking Research Symposium 2014 (pp. 1-23). Purdue University. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284315940

How to cite this article

APA

Loubser, N., Rauscher, W., & Blom, N. (2024). Types of formative feedback provided by technology teachers during practical assessment tasks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(6), em2448. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14586

Vancouver

Loubser N, Rauscher W, Blom N. Types of formative feedback provided by technology teachers during practical assessment tasks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(6):em2448. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14586

AMA

Loubser N, Rauscher W, Blom N. Types of formative feedback provided by technology teachers during practical assessment tasks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(6), em2448. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14586

Chicago

Loubser, Nelé, Willem Rauscher, and Nicolaas Blom. "Types of formative feedback provided by technology teachers during practical assessment tasks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 6 (2024): em2448. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14586

Harvard

Loubser, N., Rauscher, W., and Blom, N. (2024). Types of formative feedback provided by technology teachers during practical assessment tasks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(6), em2448. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14586

MLA

Loubser, Nelé et al. "Types of formative feedback provided by technology teachers during practical assessment tasks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 6, 2024, em2448. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14586