Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
• Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
• Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Mariman, R., Ge, H., & Kabakcı, Ö. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. PNAS, 122(26), Article e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122
• Çam, Ş. S., & Koç, G. (2024). Professional development program to develop teacher educators’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. SAGE Open, 14(1), Article 21582440241242841. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241242841
• Cheah, Y. H., Lu, J., & Kim, J. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in K-12 education: Examining teachers’ preparedness, practices, and barriers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100363
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
• Daher, W., Bshouty, D., & Hage, J. (2025). The use of generative artificial intelligence for upper secondary mathematics education through the lens of technology acceptance. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14779
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
• Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), Article 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
• Harper, M. (2024). Engineering faculty perceptions on student-use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in course completion [Master’s thesis, Utah State University]. https://doi.org/10.26076/949b-6210
• Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, M., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
• Joung, E. & Kim, Y. R. (2025). Exploring the impact of discussion responses generated from ChatGPT on student performance and experiences. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18393
• Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T. … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
• Kim, J., Klopfer, M., Grohs, J. R., Knight, D. B., Carrico, C., Lee, W. C., McNair, L. D., & Matusovich, H. M. (2025). Examining faculty and student perceptions of generative AI in university courses. Innovative Higher Education, 50, 1281-1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09774-w
• Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2
• Kong, S. C., Yang, Y., & Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328
• Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), Article 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
• Luo, J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessments: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963
• Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F.S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by Chat-GPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
• Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers & Education Open, 5, Article 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Pardos, Z. A., & Bhandari, S. (2024). ChatGPT-generated help produces learning gains equivalent to human tutor-authored help on mathematics skills. PLoS ONE, 19(5), Article e0304013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304013
• Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the “will, skill, tool” model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013
• Pörn, R., Braskén, M., Wingren, M., & Andersson, S. (2024). Attitudes towards and expectations on the role of artificial intelligence in the classroom among digitally skilled Finnish K-12 mathematics teachers. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.3.2102
• Rizos, I., Foykas, E., & Georgakopoulos, S. (2024). Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), Article ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487
• Sasota, R. S., Cristobal, R. R., Sario, I. S., Caluyo, F. S., Catilo Jr, E. G., Gonzaga Jr, E. B. R., Suan, A. P., & Tueta, P. L. D. (2021). Will-skill-tool (WST) model of technology integration in teaching science and mathematics in the Philippines. Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00185-w
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571
• Shata, A., & Hartley, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: Faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00511-7
• Smolansky, A., Cram, A., Raduescu, C., Zeivots, S., Huber, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). Educator and student perspectives on the impact of generative AI on assessments in higher education. In Proceedings of the 10^th ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 378-382). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3596191
• Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
• Walter, Y. (2024) Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
• Wang, K., Ruan, Q., Zhang, X., Fu, C., & Duan, B. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ GenAI anxiety, technology self-efficacy, and TPACK: Their structural relations with behavioral intention to design GenAI-assisted teaching. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), Article 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050373
• Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), Article em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
• Watson, C. E., & Raine, L. (2026). The AI challenge: How college faculty assess the present and future of higher education in the age of AI. American Association of Colleges and Universities & Elon University’s Imagining the Digital Future Center. https://imaginingthedigitalfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Elon-AACU-faculty-AI-survey-full-report-1-21-26.pdf
• Wijaya, T. T., Yu, Q., Cao, Y., He, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2024). Latent profile analysis of AI literacy and trust in mathematics teachers and their relations with AI dependency and 21st-century skills. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), Article 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111008
• Yadav, A., Lachney, M., Hu, A., & Tavernier, L. (2025). Integrating generative AI in teacher education: Pre-service teachers’ perspectives, attitudes, and design challenges. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2025.2581712
• Yoon, H., Hwang, J., Lee, K., Roh, K. H., & Kwon, O. N. (2024). Students’ use of generative artificial intelligence for proving mathematical statements. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56, 1531-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01629-0
• Zhang, D., Wijaya, T. T., Wang, Y., Su, M., Li, X., & Damayanti, N. W. (2025). Exploring the relationship between AI literacy, AI trust, AI dependency, and 21^st century skills in preservice mathematics teachers. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 14281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99127-0

APA

Joung, E., Brinkerhoff, R., Lee, I., Wong, A., & Ioane, O. (2026). Undergraduate mathematics faculty attitudes and experiences with generative AI integration. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(4), em2804. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18126

Vancouver

Joung E, Brinkerhoff R, Lee I, Wong A, Ioane O. Undergraduate mathematics faculty attitudes and experiences with generative AI integration. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(4):em2804. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18126

AMA

Joung E, Brinkerhoff R, Lee I, Wong A, Ioane O. Undergraduate mathematics faculty attitudes and experiences with generative AI integration. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(4), em2804. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18126

Chicago

Joung, Eunmi, Roxanne Brinkerhoff, Inyoung Lee, Allan Wong, and Ofa Ioane. "Undergraduate mathematics faculty attitudes and experiences with generative AI integration". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 4 (2026): em2804. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18126

Harvard

Joung, E., Brinkerhoff, R., Lee, I., Wong, A., and Ioane, O. (2026). Undergraduate mathematics faculty attitudes and experiences with generative AI integration. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(4), em2804. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18126

MLA

Joung, Eunmi et al. "Undergraduate mathematics faculty attitudes and experiences with generative AI integration". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 4, 2026, em2804. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18126