University Students’ Understanding of Chemistry Processes and the Quality of Evidence in their Written Arguments
Eulsun Seung 1, Aeran Choi 2 * , Beverly Pestel 1
More Detail
1 Indiana State University2 Ewha Womans University* Corresponding Author


We have developed a process-oriented chemistry laboratory curriculum for non-science majors. The purpose of this study is to explore university students’ understanding of chemistry processes -- i.e., how chemical knowledge and products are constructed and used -- and to evaluate the quality of evidence students use to support their claims regarding chemistry processes in a process-oriented chemistry laboratory course.

Material and methods:
The data were collected from four classes offered during the first two semesters in which the new curriculum was implemented. We analyzed students’ written laboratory reports, which included the components of claims, evidence, and reflection, to investigate their understanding of the process skills required in knowledge construction in chemistry. We also evaluated the quality of evidence the students used to support their claims regarding chemistry processes by using five-level criteria which we developed.

The findings of this study show that a process-oriented laboratory curriculum contributes to developing university students’ understanding of chemistry processes and the ability to link appropriate and sufficient evidence to their claims.

The findings of this study also imply that there are specific types of process skills which are unique or more necessary for chemistry research, and these skills can be developed through a process-oriented chemistry laboratory curriculum.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 12, Issue 4, April 2016, 991-1008

Publication date: 07 Mar 2016

Article Views: 1861

Article Downloads: 1413

Open Access References How to cite this article