Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment

Areej ElSayary

doi:10.29333/ejmste/9699

Full Text (PDF)

Areej ElSayary ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Zayed University, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study explores and explains teachers’ perceptions and practices in using a reflective practice model to teach STEM education in a blended learning environment. The study was conducted before the COVID-19 lockdown and continued after the quarantine till the end of the semester. The transformative learning and the experiential learning theories are used as combined conceptual frameworks to form a reflective practice model that guided this study. The participants are middle school teachers (n=18) in a private school in the United Arab Emirates UAE. A sequential mixed-method approach using quantitative and qualitative data was used. An online survey with closed-ended items was adopted to collect quantitative data from teachers. The qualitative data was collected through teachers’ semi-structured interviews using Zoom conference meeting. The study’s results reveal that teachers’ perceptions and practices about learning and skills needed in the future will be different from before COVID-19.

Keywords

blended learning
experiential learning
STEM curriculum
transformative learning

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9699

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2021 - Volume 17 Issue 2, Article No: em1942

Publication date: 13 Feb 2021

Article Views: 192

Article Downloads: 154

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Alfaki, I. (2015). From Oil to Knowledge: Transforming the UAE into a Knowledge- based Economy. Unite Arab Emirates University UAEU. College of Business and Economics.
Almqvist, C.F. Vinage, J. Vakeva, L., & Zanden, O. (2017). Assessmnet as learning in music education: The risk of “criteria compliance” replacing “learning” in the Scandinavian countries. Research Studies in Music Education, 39(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X16676649
Beane, J. (1991, October). The Middle School: The natural home of integrated curriculum. In Integrating the curriculum (pp. 9-13). Association for Supervision and Curreiculum Development.
Beard, C. M., & Wilson, J. P. (2006). Experiential Learning: A Best Practice Handbook for Educator and Trainers (2^nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2015). Assessment for creative teaching and learning. In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 330-343). Routledge International Handbooks. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Cranton, P., Carusetta, E. (2004). Perspectives on authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604268894
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design. Qualitative, Quantitative & Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Dawson, C. (2003). Writing and teaching as creative processes: Helping students and teachers develop voice and agency through writing and professional development. Keynote speech delivered as Middlesex County Teacher of the Year at the Middlesex County Superintendent’s Roundtable. Middlesex County, NJ.
Dewey, J. (1907). Waste in Education. In The School and Society (Chapter 3, pp. 77-110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York, H. Holt and Company.
Dubai Future Foundation. (2020). Life After COVID-19 (pp. 1-6). Dubai: Dubai Future Foundation.
Dugger, W., & Fellow, J. (2011). Evolution of STEM in the United States [Paper presentation]. 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia. Retrieved on 21 January 2019 from http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf
ElSayary, A. (2020). Transforming Students’ Learning through Transdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum Design. In S. A. David & C. Hill (Eds.), Curriculum Innovation and Transformation: Studies on Design, Discourse and Development (pp. 5-32). Beau Bassin: Scholar’s Press.
ElSayary, A., Forawi, S., & Mansour, N. (2015). Teaching thinking in STEM subjects: STEM education and problem-based learning. In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 357-368). Routledge International Handbooks. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Greenhill, J. Richards, J. N. Mahoney, S. Campbell, N., & Walters, L. (2018). Transformative Learning in Medical Education: Context Matters, a South Australian Longitudinal Study. Journal of Transformative Education, 16(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344617715710
Guyotte, K. W. Sochacka, N. W., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293
Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., Petocz, P., & Kelly, N. (2013). Tecnological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 22-40.
Hvidt, M. (2016). Challenges to implementing ‘Knowledge based economies’ in the Gulf region. Center for Mellemoststudier. Syddansk Universitet. Retrieved from https://www.sdu.dk/-/media/files/om_sdu/centre/c_mellemoest/videncenter/artikler/2016/hvidt+article+(sept+16).pdf
Johnson, B. and Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-method (5^th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Knowles, M. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education. Chicago: Associated Press.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lewis, L. (2017). ePortfolio as pedagogy: Threshold concepts for curriculum design. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(1-2), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017694497
Li, H., Ochsner, A., & Hall, W. (2019). Application of experiential learning to improve student engagement and experience in a mechanical engineering course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(3), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1402864
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2007). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Science Education, 14(4), 595-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2
Merriam, S. B. (2004). The role of cognitive development in Mezirow’s transformational learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 55, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604268891
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Dir Adult Cont Educ., (74), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
Moonesar, I., Mourtada, R., Shaer, S., Al-Eisawi, D., & Elomari, L. (2015). Persistence in the Abu Dhabi STEM Pipeline. Preparing Emirati Youth for Science and Technology Careers in The Innovation Economy. Mohamed Bin Rashid School of Government. Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mutch, C. (2012). Assessment for, of and as learning: developing a sustainable assessment culture in New Zealand schools. Policy Future in Education, 10(4), 374-385. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.374
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.
Owen, L. (2016). Critical Reflection on Practice Development. Emerging from physiotherapy practice, masters-level education and returning to practice: a critical reflection based on Mezirwo’s transformative learning theory. International Practice Development Journal, 6(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.62.011
Provident, I., Salls, J., Dplhi, C., Schreiber, J., Mattila, A., & Eckel, E. (2015). Design an Online Curriculum Promoting Transformative Learning in Post Professional Doctoral Students. Online Learning Volume, 19(3), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.526
Repko, A. (2008). Interdisciplinary research (1st ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Singleton, J. (2015). Head, heart and hands model for transformative learning: Place as context for changing sustainability values. Journal of Sustainability Education, 9. Retrieved from http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PDF-Singleton-JSE-March-2015-Love-Issue.pdf
Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: Engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 68-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810842193
So, H. J., Ryoo, D., Park, H., & Choi, H. (2018). What constitutes Korean pre-service teachers’ competency in STEAM education: Examining the multi-functional structure. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0410-5
Strange, H., & Gibson, H. (2017). An investigation of experiential and transformative learning in study abroad programs. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal Of Study Abroad, 29(1), 85-100. https://doi..org/10.36366/frontiers.v29i1.387
Taylor, E. W. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999-2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26, 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475
Taylor, E. W. (2016). Research Conference 2016: Improving STEM Learning, What will it take? Australian Council for Educational Research.
UAE Government. (2015). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in the United Arab Emirates (1^st ed.).
UAE National Committee on SDGs (2017). UAE and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Excellence in Implementation. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/20161UAE_SDGs_Report_Full_English.pdf
UAE Vision 2021 (2009). Vision 2021: United in Ambition and Determination. Abu Dhabi: United Arab Emirates. Retrieved from http://www.vision2021.ae

How to cite this article

Vancouver

ElSayary A. Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(2):em1942. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9699

APA

ElSayary, A. (2021). Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1942. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9699

AMA

ElSayary A. Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(2), em1942. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9699

Chicago

ElSayary, Areej. "Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 2 (2021): em1942. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9699

Harvard

ElSayary, A. (2021). Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1942. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9699

MLA

ElSayary, Areej "Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 2, 2021, em1942. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9699