Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach

Adri Nirwan Ahamad; Mohd Ali Samsudin; Mohd Erfy Ismail; Nur Jahan Ahmad

doi:10.29333/ejmste/9698

Full Text (PDF)

Adri Nirwan Ahamad ¹ ^* , Mohd Ali Samsudin ¹ , Mohd Erfy Ismail ² , Nur Jahan Ahmad ¹

More Detail

¹ Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA² Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, MALAYSIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The complexity of physics concepts in online learning environment probably will only benefit certain group of students. Thus, there are suggestions that the approach of delivering physics concepts in online learning environment shoud be conducted in various ways. The purposed of research was to investigate the effect of online multiple intelligence-based learning on achievement in physics’ motion concept among 10^th grade students. The one group pre-test and post-test design were used in this research with purposive sampling, with 30 students in a science junior high school in Malaysia. In the research, the data were obtained from Multiple Intelligence Test and Physics Force and Motion Concept Test, which were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and non-parametric test Wilcoxon and Friedman. The findings reveal that online multiple intelligence-based learning had an effect on the achievement in physics’ force and motion concepts with mathematical logic and Intrapersonal intelligence group performed significantly better than others.

Keywords

multiple intelligence
physics motion concept
online learning
science teaching

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 17, Issue 2, February 2021, Article No: em1941

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9698

Publication date: 13 Feb 2021

Article Views: 2948

Article Downloads: 1852

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Abdul Rahim, K., & Selamat, S. R. (2014). Penerapan Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai dalam Pengajaran Jenis-Jenis Ayat [Application of Multiple Intelligences Theory in the Teaching of Sentence Types]. Seminar Bahasa Melayu 2014.
Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ Interest and Engagement in Classroom Activities. In Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_13
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32-44.
Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies, and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved from http://www.ictliteracy.info/rf.pdf/Web2.0_research.pdf
Armstrong, T. (2000). In their own way: Discovering and encouraging your child’s multiple intelligences (rev. and updated ed.). New York, NY: Penguin Putnam.
Bachtold M. (2013). What Do Students “Construct” According to Constructivism in Science Education? Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2477-2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9369-7
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2008). Research in Education (10^th Ed.). India: Prentice Hall.
Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2007). Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 16-32.
Cambell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Chicago: Rand Menally.
Chien, C.-F., Chen, G. Y.-H., & Liao, C.-J. (2019). Designing a Connectivist Flipped Classroom Platform Using Unified Modelling Language. Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2019010101
Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2005). What Do Pupils Think of Open Science Investigations? A Study of Singaporean Primary 6 Pupils. Educational Research. 47(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000337596
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Choi, I., Lee, S. J., & Jung, J. W. (2008) Designing Multimedia Case-Based Instruction Accommodating students’ Diverse Learning Style. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 5-25.
Chung, K. C. (2008). Antecedent of Brand Trust in Online Tertiary Education: A Malaysian and Singapore Perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(4), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v3n4p3
Cohen, L., Manion. L., & Morrison, K. (2001). Research Methods in Education (5^th Ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation; A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678
Elkins, J. (2007). Learning disabilities: Bringing fields and nations together. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 392-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400050201
Erinosho, S. Y. (2013). How Do Students Perceive the Difficulty of Physics in Secondary School? An Exploratory Study in Nigeria. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), Special Issue Volume 3 Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.20533/IJCDSE.2042.6364.2013.0212
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gen, R. (2000). Technology and multiple intelligences. ED at a Distance, 15(5), 4-9.
George, G., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Gray, K. C., & Xiaoli, C. (2001). Computer and internet usage in education: Theories, practice, and research basics. Journal Educational Technology System, 29(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.2190/87H6-RA7J-V9K9-0U21
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009a). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130-1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01484.x
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009b). Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age: Web 2.0 and Classroom Research--What Path Should We Take “Now”? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671
Hair, J. F. H., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7^th Ed.). Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
Halpern, D. F. (2002). Cognitive Science and the Work of Reform. In J. L. Narum & K. Conover (Eds.), Building Robust Learning Environment in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and Procedures Assessing Science Process Skill. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044
Howell, A. J., & Buro, K. (2009). Implicit beliefs, achievement goals, and procrastination: a mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.08.006
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Mantyla, T., & Koponen, I. T. (2007). Understanding the Role of Measurements in Creating Physical Quantities: A Case Study of Learning to Quantify Temperature in Physics Teacher Education. Science& Education, 16(3), 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9021-2
Ministry Education of Malaysia (MOE) (2012). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Fizik Tingkatan Empat [Fourth Level Physical Curriculum Specifications]. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum KPM. Kuala Lumpur.
Murphy, K. L., & Cifuentes, L. (2001). Using web tools, collaborating, and learning online. Distance Education, 22(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220207
Neset, D. (2005). The effect of web-based homework on university students’ physics achievements. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 156-161.
Ng’ambi, D., & Lombe, A. (2012). Using Podcasting to Facilitate Student Learning: A Constructivist Perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 181-192.
Nik Daud, N. S., Abd Karim, M. M., Wan Hassan, S. W., & Rahman, N. (2015). Misconception and Difficulties in Introductory Physics Among High School and University Students: An Overview in Mechanics (34 - 47). EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology (EJSMT), 2(1), 34-47.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lesson from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Piew, C. Y. (2013). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan [Basic Research Statistics: Second Edition] (2nd Ed.). McGraw Hill.
Pulit anak Lai (1998). Mengkaji Strategi Pengajaran Fizik di Sekolah: Satu Kajian Kes di beberapa Sekolah Daerah Kajang, Selangor [Studying Physics Teaching Strategies in Schools: A Case Study in Several Kajang District Schools, Selangor] (Unpublished Thesis). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Ramlah, J., & Mahani, R. (2002). Psikologi Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kontemporari [Educational Psychology: A Contemporary Approach]. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rhodes, L. K., & Bellamy, T. (1999). Choices and consequences in the reform of teacher education. Journal or Teacher Education, 50, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719905000103
Sandra, R., Abu Bakar, N., & Norlidah. A, (2013). Penggunaan ICT merentas kurikulum standard prasekolah kebangsaan (kspk): tinjauan di prasekolah kementerian pelajaran Malaysia [Use of ICT across the national preschool standard curriculum (kspk): survey in preschools ministry of education Malaysia]. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(4), 65.
Shy-Jong, J. (2007). A Study of Students’ Construction of Science Knowledge: Talk and Writing in a Collaborative Group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701200781
Sidman-Taveau, R. & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2001). Constructivist inspiration: A project-based model for L2 learning in virtual worlds. Texas Papers in Foreign Language, 6(1), 63-82.
Trif, L. (2015). Training models of social constructivism: Teaching based on developing a scaffold. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences: The 6th International Conference Edu World, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.184
Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Student’ characteristics, self regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
Wang, Y. D. (2014). Building student trust in online learning environment. Distance Education, 35(3), 345- 359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955267
Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, E. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00184.x

How to cite this article

APA

Ahamad, A. N., Samsudin, M. A., Ismail, M. E., & Ahmad, N. J. (2021). Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1941. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9698

Vancouver

Ahamad AN, Samsudin MA, Ismail ME, Ahmad NJ. Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(2):em1941. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9698

AMA

Ahamad AN, Samsudin MA, Ismail ME, Ahmad NJ. Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(2), em1941. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9698

Chicago

Ahamad, Adri Nirwan, Mohd Ali Samsudin, Mohd Erfy Ismail, and Nur Jahan Ahmad. "Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 2 (2021): em1941. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9698

Harvard

Ahamad, A. N., Samsudin, M. A., Ismail, M. E., and Ahmad, N. J. (2021). Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1941. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9698

MLA

Ahamad, Adri Nirwan et al. "Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 2, 2021, em1941. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9698