• Annetta, L. A. (2010). The “I’s” have it: A framework for serious educational game design. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018985
• Baldominos, A., Saez, Y., & del Pozo, C. G. (2015). An approach to physical rehabilitation using state-of-the-art virtual reality and motion tracking technologies. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.457
• Bower, M., Lee, M. J., & Dalgarno, B. (2017). Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: Factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 407-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12435
• Calleja, G. (2014). Immersion in virtual worlds (pp. 222-236). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199826162.013.012
• Calogiuri, G., Litleskare, S., Fagerheim, K. A., Rydgren, T. L., Brambilla, E., & Thurston, M. (2017). Experiencing Nature through Immersive Virtual Environments: Environmental Perceptions, Physical Engagement, and Affective Responses during a Simulated Nature Walk. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02321
• Choi, A., Hand, B., & Greenbowe, T. (2013). Students’ written arguments in general chemistry laboratory investigations. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1763-1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9330-1
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086
• Cordie, L., Lin, X., & Whitton, N. (2017). Utilizing Digital Educational Games to Enhance Adult Learning. Handbook of Research on Program Development and Assessment Methodologies in K-20 Education, 171. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3132-6.ch009
• Crawford, B. A., Capps, D. K., van Driel, J., Lederman, N., Lederman, J., Luft, J. A., & Smith, K. (2014). Learning to teach science as inquiry: Developing an evidence-based framework for effective teacher professional development. In Topics and Trends in Current Science Education (pp. 193-211). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_12
• Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
• Davis, K., & Singh, S. (2015). Digital badges in afterschool learning: Documenting the perspectives and experiences of students and educators. Computers & Education, 88, 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.011
• Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J., Büttner, G., Fauth, B., ... Hardy, I. (2015). Embedded formative assessment and classroom process quality: How do they interact in promoting science understanding?. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1133-1159. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596412
• Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735-745). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_59
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
• Grassi, P. R., Zaretskaya, N., Bartels, A., Goerke, S., Milde, K. S., Bukowiecki, R., & Wanker, E. E. (2015). Eye Tracking and Visualization: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications: ETVIS 2015. NeuroImage, 144, 1-17.
• Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in US public schools: 2009.
• Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
• Hancock, P. A., Mercado, J. E., Merlo, J., & Van Erp, J. B. (2013). Improving target detection in visual search through the augmenting multi-sensory cues. Ergonomics, 56(5), 729-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.771219
• Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015
• Katz, J. E., & Halpern, D. (2015). Can virtual museums motivate students? toward a constructivist learning approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 776-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9563-7
• Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational psychologist, 48(3), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
• Klatzky, R. L., Giudice, N. A., Bennett, C. R., & Loomis, J. M. (2014). Touch-screen technology for the dynamic display of 2D spatial information without vision: Promise and progress. Multisensory research, 27(5-6), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002447
• Kutlu, M. O. (2012). Developing a scale on the usage of learner control strategy. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(10), 244. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.302
• Lamb, R. (2014). Examination of allostasis and online laboratory simulations in a middle school science classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.017
• Lamb, R. L. (2013). The application of cognitive diagnostic approaches via neural network analysis of serious educational games (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1920/8342
• Lamb, R. L. (2016). Examination of the Effects of Dimensionality on Cognitive Processing in Science: A Computational Modeling Experiment Comparing Online Laboratory Simulations and Serious Educational Games. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9587-z
• Lamb, R. L., & Annetta, L. (2013). The use of online modules and the effect on student outcomes in a high school chemistry class. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9417-5
• Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.040
• Lamb, R., & Annetta, L. (2012). Influences of gender on computer simulation outcomes. Meridian, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/review/winter2010/lamb/
• Lamb, R., Annetta, L., & Vallett, D. (2015). The interface of creativity, fluency, lateral thinking and technology while designing Serious Educational Games in a science classroom. Electron J Res Educ Psychol, 13(2), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.36.14110
• Lamb, R., Etopio, E., & Lambⁱ, R.E. (2019) Virtual reality play therapy. International Journal of Play Therapy
• Lawson, G., Salanitri, D., & Waterfield, B. (2016). Future directions for the development of virtual reality within an automotive manufacturer. Applied ergonomics, 53, 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.024
• Lin, T. J., & Yu-Ju, L. (2015). Language learning in virtual reality environments: Past, present, and future. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 486.
• Lui, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2014). Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
• Makani, J., Durier-Copp, M., Kiceniuk, D., & Blandford, A. (2016). Strengthening Deeper Learning Through Virtual Teams in E-learning: A Synthesis of Determinants and Best Practices. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 31(2).
• Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
• Nelson, D., & Annetta, L. A. (2016). Creating Disruptive Innovators: Serious Educational Game Design on the Technology and Engineering Spectrum. In Connecting Science and Engineering Education Practices in Meaningful Ways (pp. 3-17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16399-4_1
• Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims, and evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Heinemann.
• Pinson, M. H., Barkowsky, M., & Le Callet, P. (2013). Selecting scenes for 2D and 3D subjective video quality tests. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2013(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-5281-2013-50
• Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
• Procci, K. (2015). The subjective gameplay experience: An examination of the revised game engagement model.
• Psotka, J. (2013). Educational Games and Virtual Reality as Disruptive Technologies. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 69-80.
• Rao, S. S. (2013). The Finite Element Method in Engineering: Pergamon International Library of Science, Technology, Engineering and Social Studies. Elsevier.
• Richards, D., & Taylor, M. (2015). A Comparison of learning gains when using a 2D simulation tool versus a 3D virtual world: An experiment to find the right representation involving the Marginal Value Theorem. Computers & Education, 86, 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.009
• Riva, G., Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Mantovani, F., & Gaggioli, A. (2016). Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00164
• Rosenblatt, V., Worthley, R., & MacNab, B. (2013). From contact to development in experiential cultural intelligence education: The mediating influence of expectancy disconfirmation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), 356-379. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0199
• Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2014). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 7(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.37
• Savin-Baden, M., Poulton, T., Beaumont, C., & Conradi, E. (2016). What is real? Using problem-based learning in virtual worlds. In Educational technologies in medical and health sciences education (pp. 79-97). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08275-2_5
• Schofield, D. (2014). A virtual education: guidelines for using games technology. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.28945/1964
• Sharma, S., Agada, R., & Ruffin, J. (2013, April). Virtual reality classroom as an constructivist approach. In Southeastcon, 2013 Proceedings of IEEE (pp. 1-5). https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2013.6567441
• Shute, V., Rahimi, S., & Emihovich, B. (2017). Assessment for Learning in Immersive Environments. In Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education (pp. 71-87). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_5
• Tan, D., & Nijholt, A. (2010). Brain-computer interfaces and human-computer interaction. In Brain-Computer Interfaces (pp. 3-19). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-272-8
• Vaughan, N., Gabrys, B., & Dubey, V. N. (2016). An overview of self-adaptive technologies within virtual reality training. Computer Science Review, 22, 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2016.09.001
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2016). Play and Its Role in the Mental Development of the Child. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(2), 3-25.
• Waight, N., Liu, X., Gregorius, R. M., Smith, E., & Park, M. (2014). Teacher conceptions and approaches associated with an immersive instructional implementation of computer-based models and assessment in a secondary chemistry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 467-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.787506
• Wood, L. C., & Reiners, T. (2015). Storytelling to immersive learners in an authentic virtual training environment. In Gamification in Education and Business (pp. 315-329). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_16
• Yoon, S. Y., Choi, Y. J., & Oh, H. (2015). User attributes in processing 3D VR-enabled showroom: Gender, visual cognitive styles, and the sense of presence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 82, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.04.002

APA

Lamb, R., Lin, J., & Firestone, J. B. (2020). Virtual Reality Laboratories: A Way Forward for Schools?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206

Vancouver

Lamb R, Lin J, Firestone JB. Virtual Reality Laboratories: A Way Forward for Schools?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(6):em1856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206

AMA

Lamb R, Lin J, Firestone JB. Virtual Reality Laboratories: A Way Forward for Schools?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(6), em1856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206

Chicago

Lamb, Richard, Jing Lin, and Jonah B Firestone. "Virtual Reality Laboratories: A Way Forward for Schools?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 6 (2020): em1856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206

Harvard

Lamb, R., Lin, J., and Firestone, J. B. (2020). Virtual Reality Laboratories: A Way Forward for Schools?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206

MLA

Lamb, Richard et al. "Virtual Reality Laboratories: A Way Forward for Schools?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 6, 2020, em1856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206