• Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82 (3), 343-356.
• Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: a better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84, 486-506.
• Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol.1, pp. 77- 165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, selfregulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D. & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27– 43.
• Clement, J. (1983). A conceptual model of discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 325- 339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.
• Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978) Pupils and paradigms; a review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
• Ferrari, M., & Elik, N. (2003). Influences on intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 21-54). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906-911.
• Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic.
• Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 85-99.
• Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1−23). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
• Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64-74.
• Henderson, C. (2002). Common concerns about the force concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 40, 542-547.
• Hennessey, M. G. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Boston, MA.
• Hennessey, M. G. (2003). Metacognitive aspects of students’ reflective discourse: Implications for intentional conceptual change teaching and learning. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 103-132). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.
• Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2000). Writing and conceptual change. What changes? Instructional Science, 28, 199-226.
• McCloskey, M. (1983) Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner, & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 229- 324). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
• Pintrich, P. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Future directions for theory and research on intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 429-441). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
• Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-371.
• Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Driver, R. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies (pp. 310- 329). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
• Ueno, N. (1993). Reconsidering p-prims theory from the viewpoint of situated cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2-3), 239-248.
• Vosniadou, S (1999). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspective on conceptual change (pp. 3-14). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
• Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61-76). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
• Vosniadou, S. (2003). Exploring the relationship between conceptual change and intentional learning. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 377-406). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates..
• White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11(Special Issue), 577-586.
• Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). Is heat hot? Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomenon. Learning and Instruction, 11, 331-355.

APA

Yürük, N. (2007). A Case Study of One Student’s Metaconceptual Processes and the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75411

Vancouver

Yürük N. A Case Study of One Student’s Metaconceptual Processes and the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(4):305-25. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75411

AMA

Yürük N. A Case Study of One Student’s Metaconceptual Processes and the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(4), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75411

Chicago

Yürük, Nejla. "A Case Study of One Student’s Metaconceptual Processes and the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2007 3 no. 4 (2007): 305-325. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75411

Harvard

Yürük, N. (2007). A Case Study of One Student’s Metaconceptual Processes and the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), pp. 305-325. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75411

MLA

Yürük, Nejla "A Case Study of One Student’s Metaconceptual Processes and the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 4, 2007, pp. 305-325. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75411