• Akkuzu, N., & Uyulgan, M. A. (2016). An epistemological inquiry into organic chemistry education: Exploration of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of functional groups. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00128e
• Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
• Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ application of chemical concepts when solving chemistry problems in different contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00051j
• Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2012). An example of learning about plastics and their evaluation as a contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in secondary school chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90067F
• Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90060A
• Colucci-Gray, L., Camino, E., Barbiero, G., & Gray, D. (2006). From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Science Education, 90(2), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20109
• Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies - Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Science Education, 87(6), 767-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10081
• Duis, J. M. (2011). Organic chemistry educators’ perspectives on fundamental concepts and misconceptions: An exploratory study. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 346-350. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1007266
• Duit, R., Gropengießer H., & Kattmann U. (2005). Towards science education that is relevant for improving practice: the model of educational reconstruction. In H. Fischer (ed.), Developing standards in research on science education (pp. 1-9). Taylor & Francis.
• Eilks, I., Rauch, F., Ralle, B., & Hofstein, A.. (2013). How to balance the chemistry curriculum between science and society. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.). Teaching chemistry - A Studybook (pp. 1-36). Sense.
• Eisen, A., Hall, A., Lee, T. S., & Zupko, J. (2009). Teaching water: Connecting across disciplines and into daily life to address complex societal issues. College Teaching, 57(2), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.57.2.99-104
• Erduran S., Simon S., & Osborne J., (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
• Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: a journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
• Henderleiter, J., Smart, R., Anderson, J., & Elian, O. (2001). How do organic chemistry students understand and apply hydrogen bonding? Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1126. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1126
• Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education-a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
• Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025
• Ideland, M. (2018). Science, coloniality, and “the Great Rationality Divide”: How practices, places, and persons are culturally attached to one snother in cience education. Science & Education, 27(7-8), 783-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0006-8
• Juntunen, M. K., & Aksela, M. K. (2014a). Education for sustainable development in chemistry – challenges, possibilities and pedagogical models in Finland and elsewhere. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00128A
• Juntunen, M. K., & Aksela, M. K. (2014b). Improving students’ argumentation skills through a product life-cycle analysis project in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00068d
• Karpudewan, M., & Roth, W. M. (2018). Changes in primary students’ informal reasoning during an environment-related curriculum on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9787-x
• Khaddoor, R., Al-Amoush, S., & Eilks, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of the intended curriculum and its presentation in 10th grade chemistry textbooks from seven Arabic countries. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00186f
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2012). Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socioscientific issue: A cross-context comparison. Science Education, 96(5), 787-807. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21021
• Liu, S. Y., Lin, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 497-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20422
• Mahaffy, P. (2006). Moving chemistry education into 3D: A tetrahedral metaphor for understanding chemistry: Union carbide award for chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p49
• Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 231-245.
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs
• Mueller, M. P. (2009). Educational reflections on the “ecological crisis”: Ecojustice, environmentalism, and sustainability. Science & Education, 18(8), 1031-1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9179-x
• Murray, J. J. (2015). Re-visioning science education in Canada: A new polar identity and purpose. Education Canada, 55(4). http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/re-visioning-science-education-Canada
• Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072746
• Reid, N., & Hassan, A. (2004). Ideas underpinning success in an introductory course in organic chemistry. University Chemistry Education, 8(2), 40-51.
• Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-280). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy: The influence of a science curriculum policy image. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D.A. Roberts, P. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction (pp. 11-27). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Rundgren, C. J., Eriksson, M., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2016). Investigating the intertwinement of knowledge, value, and experience of upper secondary students’ argumentation concerning socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 25(9-10), 1049-1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9859-x
• Rundgren, S. N. C., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-24.
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
• Simonneaux, L. (2014). Questions socialement vives and socio-scientific issues: New trends of research to meet the training needs of postmodern society. In C. Bruguiere, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clement (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education (pp. 37-54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_3
• Sjöström, J. & Eilks, I. (2018), Reconsidering Different Visions of Scientific Literacy and Science Education Based on the Concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mavarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65-88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4
• Sjöström, J., Eilks, I., & Zuin, V. G. (2016). Towards eco-reflexive science education: A critical reflection about educational implications of Green Chemistry. Science & Education, 25(3-4), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9818-6
• Snively, G., & Williams, W. L. (2016). Knowing home: Braiding indigenous science with Western science (Book 1). University of Victoria.
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of “relevance” in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
• Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016058
• Wiyarsi, A., & Çalik, M. (2019). Revisiting the scientific habits of mind scale for socio-scientific issues in the Indonesian context. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2430-2447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1683912
• Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: A prelude to action. Science & Education, 17(8-9), 799-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
• Zidny, R., & Eilks, I. (2020). Integrating perspectives from indigenous knowledge and Western science in secondary and higher chemistry learning to contribute to sustainability education. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 16, 100229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100229
• Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(1), 145-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
• Zohar A., & Dori Y. J., (2003), Higher order thinking kills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive?. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
• Zohar, A. (2004). Higher order thinking in science classrooms: Students’ learning and teachers’ professional development. Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1854-1
• Zowada, C., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V. G., & Eilks, I. (2019). Developing a lesson plan on conventional and green pesticides in chemistry education – a project of participatory action research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00128j
• Zowada, C., Gulacar, O., & Eilks, I. (2018). Incorporating a web-based hydraulic fracturing module in general chemistry as a socio-scientific issue that engages students. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(4), 553-559. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00613

APA

Zidny, R., Laraswati, A. N., & Eilks, I. (2021). A Case Study on Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts and Use of Arguments in Teaching on the Sustainability-Oriented Chemistry Issue of Pesticides Use Under Inclusion of Different Scientific Worldviews. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(7), em1981. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10979

Vancouver

Zidny R, Laraswati AN, Eilks I. A Case Study on Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts and Use of Arguments in Teaching on the Sustainability-Oriented Chemistry Issue of Pesticides Use Under Inclusion of Different Scientific Worldviews. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(7):em1981. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10979

AMA

Zidny R, Laraswati AN, Eilks I. A Case Study on Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts and Use of Arguments in Teaching on the Sustainability-Oriented Chemistry Issue of Pesticides Use Under Inclusion of Different Scientific Worldviews. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(7), em1981. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10979

Chicago

Zidny, Robby, Ayu Ningtias Laraswati, and Ingo Eilks. "A Case Study on Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts and Use of Arguments in Teaching on the Sustainability-Oriented Chemistry Issue of Pesticides Use Under Inclusion of Different Scientific Worldviews". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 7 (2021): em1981. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10979

Harvard

Zidny, R., Laraswati, A. N., and Eilks, I. (2021). A Case Study on Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts and Use of Arguments in Teaching on the Sustainability-Oriented Chemistry Issue of Pesticides Use Under Inclusion of Different Scientific Worldviews. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(7), em1981. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10979

MLA

Zidny, Robby et al. "A Case Study on Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts and Use of Arguments in Teaching on the Sustainability-Oriented Chemistry Issue of Pesticides Use Under Inclusion of Different Scientific Worldviews". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 7, 2021, em1981. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10979