• American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmark for science literacy. Washington, D. C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
• Anderson R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell, and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807- 830). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Ault, C. R. (1998). Criteria of excellence for geological inquiry: The necessity of ambiguity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 189-212.
• Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175- 218.
• Engelhardt, W. Von & Zimmermann, J. (1988). Theory of earth science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Exline, J. D. (1998). The national survey with respect to Earth Science education at state, district, and school levels. Paper presented at the American Geological Institute Conference, Toronto, Canada.
• Frodeman, R. (1995). Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 107(8), 960-968.
• Gould, S. J. (1986). Evolution and the triumph of homology, or why history matters. American Scientist, 74, 60-69.
• Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery; an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, England: University Press.
• Kathleen, M. B., Robert, H. F., Mary, K. H., Kathleen, K., Peter E. M., Karen, J. M. & Robert J. S. (2005). Holt science & technology Earth science. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Kim, C. J. (1995). Developing an effective Earth Science inquiry learning model based upon the characteristics of Earth Science: Abduction inquiry learning model. The Journal of the Institute of Science Education, 16, 130-148.
• Kim, C. J. (2002). Inference frequently used in earth science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 23(2), 188-193.
• Kim, C. J., Kim G. S. & Kim, K. H. (1994). Analysis and comparison of the project synthesis goal cluster orientation of Korean and American Earth Science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 15, 23-30.
• Kim, C. J., Park I. S., An, H. S., Oh, P. S., Kim, D. Y. & Park, Y. S. (2005). Development of inquiry analysis framework based on features of earth science methodology and an analysis of ‘earth history and diastrophism’ inquiry activities in the 8th grade. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 26(8), 751-758.
• Kulm, G., Roseman, J. & Treistman, M. (1999). A benchmarks-based approach to textbook evaluation. Science Books and Films, 35, 147-153.
• Kyung J. B., Youn, I. H., Lee, K. H., Kim, G. R., Hwang, W. G. & Lee, G. Y. (2003). High school earth science 1. Seoul, Korea: Joungang Kyouyuk Jinhung Research Center.
• Lawson, A. E. (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 716-740.
• Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Process of discovery and explanation. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., Garden, R. A. & O'Connor, K. M. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International Science Report - 2000 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Boston College: International Study Center of Lynch School of Education.
• National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
• Oh, P. S. & Kim, C. J. (2005). A theoretical study on abduction as an inquiry method in Earth Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25, 610-623.
• Orion, N. & Ault, Jr. C.R. (2007). Learning earth science. In S. K. Abell, and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 653-687). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Park, D. Y. (2005). Differences between a standards-based curriculum and traditional textbooks in high school Earth Science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 540-5

APA

Park, M., Park, D.-Y., & Lee, R. E. (2009). A Comparative Analysis of Earth Science Curriculum Using Inquiry Methodology between Korean and the U.S. Textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(4), 395-411. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75289

Vancouver

Park M, Park DY, Lee RE. A Comparative Analysis of Earth Science Curriculum Using Inquiry Methodology between Korean and the U.S. Textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2009;5(4):395-411. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75289

AMA

Park M, Park DY, Lee RE. A Comparative Analysis of Earth Science Curriculum Using Inquiry Methodology between Korean and the U.S. Textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2009;5(4), 395-411. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75289

Chicago

Park, Mira, Do-Yong Park, and Robert E. Lee. "A Comparative Analysis of Earth Science Curriculum Using Inquiry Methodology between Korean and the U.S. Textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2009 5 no. 4 (2009): 395-411. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75289

Harvard

Park, M., Park, D.-Y., and Lee, R. E. (2009). A Comparative Analysis of Earth Science Curriculum Using Inquiry Methodology between Korean and the U.S. Textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(4), pp. 395-411. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75289

MLA

Park, Mira et al. "A Comparative Analysis of Earth Science Curriculum Using Inquiry Methodology between Korean and the U.S. Textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 5, no. 4, 2009, pp. 395-411. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75289