Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Akendita, P. A., Arhin, A. K., & Arthur, Y. D. (2026). Modeling the impact of collaborative learning and motivation on senior high school mathematics achievement. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202634699
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
• Campbell, C. (1999). Instructional materials: Their preparation and evaluation. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23, 55-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599910257515
• Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380-400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084
• Care, E., Kim. H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education system alignment for 21^st century skills: Focus on assessment. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings Institution.
• Chan, K. K., & Leung, S. W. (2014). Dynamic geometry software improves mathematical achievement: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.3.c
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615
• Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally.
• Cubacub, P. D. C., & Jimenez, E. C. (2025). The role of blended learning in enhancing student engagement: Evidence from high schools in Micronesia. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 6(3), Article 33074. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202533074
• Dereje, E. W. (2023). The effect of inquiry based technology integration on conceptual and procedural geometry knowledge of preservice mathematics teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 5(4), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202321592
• Domino, J. (2010). The effects of physical manipulatives on achievement in mathematics in grades k-6: A meta-analysis [Unpublished PhD thesis]. State University of New York.
• Drijvers, P., & Sinclair, N. (2024). The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: Purposes and perspectives. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x
• Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
• Edenfield, K. W. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ use of instructional materials while implementing a new curriculum [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Georgia.
• Elaldı, Ş., & Çifçi, T. (2021). The effectiveness of using infographics on academic achievement: A meta-analysis and a meta-thematic analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 92-118. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021473498
• Elbir, D., & Özmen, Z. M. (2024). Investigation of mathematics teachers’ teaching practices in transition to algebra in the context of letter symbols. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202426544
• Ghaemi, H., & Bahrami, A. (2025). Dynamic adaptive algorithms in personalized literacy interventions: A data-driven analysis of vocabulary development outcomes. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(4), 188-208. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202535544
• Gullion, H. L. (2024). Virtual versus tangible math manipulatives: A quasi-experimental study comparing the impact of different types on mathematical understanding [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Liberty University.
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
• Jeng, A. (2024). Individualism and collectivism’s impact on students’ academic helping interactions: An integrative review. Social Psychology of Education, 27(5), 2771-2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09920-4
• Kablan, Z. (2016). The effect of manipulatives on mathematics achievement across different learning styles. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.946889
• Kablan, Z., Topan, B., & Erkan, B. (2013). The effectiveness level of material use in classroom instruction: A meta-analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1638-1644. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1692
• Kul, U., Celik, S., & Aksu, Z. (2018). The impact of educational material use on mathematics achievement: A meta- analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11420a
• Li, Q., & Ma, X. A. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8
• Mensah, N., Boateng, F. O., & Frank Gordon, J. (2025). The effect of using Photomath on pre-service teachers’ algebra achievement: The mediating role of conceptual understanding. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(2), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202531125
• Milenković, A., Stevanić, J., & Zdravković, N. (2025). The impact of discovery-based learning with physical manipulatives in teaching the area of triangles and quadrilaterals on students’ achievement. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(3), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202533557
• Moyer, P. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014596316942
• Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 35-50. http://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2013070103
• Mpuangnan, K. N., Adjei, B. K., & Govender, S. N. (2024). Impact of multiple representations-based instruction on teaching and learning of linear equations. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425242
• Natsiopoulos, G., & Angelakeris, M. (2023). A novel e-learning tool for magnetism and magnetic materials. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 4(1), Article 19972. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202319972
• Ochugboju, A. O., & Díez-Palomar, J. (2025). Systematic review on the use of virtual and physical manipulatives by primary school teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, Article 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102188
• Osei, E. G., Boakye, R. O., & Osei-Bona, H. K. (2025). Video-based multimedia instructions and academic performance: An analysis of gender differences in learning linear equations at the basic school. Sustainable and Pedagogical Technologies, 1(1), Article e41090. https://doi.org/10.33902/SPT.202541090
• Ouyang, S., Zhang, W., Xue, L., Mat Rashid, A., Pyng, H. S., & Hassan, A. B. (2025). The cultural compass: A systematic review on cultural dimensions theory in educational settings. SAGE Open, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251342160
• Peltier, C., Morin, K. L., Bouck, E. C., Lingo, M. E., Pulos, J. M., Scheffler, F. A., Suk, A., Mathews, L. A., Sinclair, T. E., & Deardorff, M. (2020). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0222466919844516
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Shin, M., Simmons, M., Meador, A., Goode, F. J., Deal, A., & Jackson, T. (2023). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: Applied examples using virtual manipulatives. Intervention in School and Clinic, 58(3), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512221081268
• Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (1998). Can a teacher intervention improve classroom practices and student motivation in mathematics? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 462-470.
• Syafril, S., Asril, Z., Engkizar, E., Zafirah, A., Agusti, F. A., & Sugiharta, I. (2021). Designing prototype model of virtual geometry in mathematics learning using augmented reality. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796, Article 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012035
• Tosuntaş, Ş. B. (2020). Diffusion of responsibility in group work: Social loafing. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020465073
• Wampold, B. E., Ahn, H., & Kim, D. (2000). Meta-analysis in the social sciences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03026147
• Wittmann, E. C. (2021). Connecting mathematics and mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61570-3
• Yıldırım, M., & Turgut, Y. E. (2025). The effect of the flipped classroom model on pre-service teachers’ academic achievement, self-regulated learning skills, and classroom engagement. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(3), 242-257. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202535543

APA

Danişman, Ş., Savaş, G., Ünveren Bilgiç, E. N., & Arabacı, D. (2026). A meta-analysis of the effect of use of materials on mathematics achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(5), em2828. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18505

Vancouver

Danişman Ş, Savaş G, Ünveren Bilgiç EN, Arabacı D. A meta-analysis of the effect of use of materials on mathematics achievement. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(5):em2828. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18505

AMA

Danişman Ş, Savaş G, Ünveren Bilgiç EN, Arabacı D. A meta-analysis of the effect of use of materials on mathematics achievement. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(5), em2828. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18505

Chicago

Danişman, Şahin, Gülşade Savaş, Emine Nur Ünveren Bilgiç, and Duygu Arabacı. "A meta-analysis of the effect of use of materials on mathematics achievement". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 5 (2026): em2828. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18505

Harvard

Danişman, Ş., Savaş, G., Ünveren Bilgiç, E. N., and Arabacı, D. (2026). A meta-analysis of the effect of use of materials on mathematics achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(5), em2828. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18505

MLA

Danişman, Şahin et al. "A meta-analysis of the effect of use of materials on mathematics achievement". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 5, 2026, em2828. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18505