• Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1998). High school students' perceptions of how major global environmental effects might cause skin cancer. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969809599110.
• Dawson, V. (2012). Science teachers' perspectives about climate change. Teaching Science, 58(3).
• Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2013). Australian secondary school students' understanding of climate change. Teaching Science, 59(3), 9-14.
• Dupigny‐Giroux, L. A. L. (2010). Exploring the challenges of climate science literacy: Lessons from students, teachers and lifelong learners. Geography Compass, 4(9), 1203-1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00368.x.
• Guba, E. G. (1981). ERIC/ECTJ annual review paper: criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163–194), 105.
• Heimlich, J., & Ardoin, N. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802148881.
• Hewson, P. W., A'B, H. & Mariana, G. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72(5), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720506.
• Hill, J. L., & Nelson, A. (2011). New technology, new pedagogy? Employing video podcasts in learning and teaching about exotic ecosystems. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.545873.
• Huertas, A., & Adler, D. (2012). Is News Corp. failing science? Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
• Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers’ professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022.
• Johnson, I. (2016), Climate change may be escalating so fast it could be ‘game over’, scientists warn. UK: Independent news online. Retrieved on March 8, 2018 from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science.
• /climate-change-game-over-global-warming-climate-sensitivity-seven-degrees-a7407881.html.
• Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.018.
• Leppisaari, I., & Lee, O. (2012). Modelling digital natives' international collaboration: Finnish-Korean experiences of environmental education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 244.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75): Sage.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427.
• Manolas, E., & Leal Filho, W. (2011). The use of cooperative learning in dispelling student misconceptions on climate change. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(3), 168-182.
• McCaffrey, M. S., & Buhr, S. M. (2008). Clarifying climate confusion: Addressing systemic holes, cognitive gaps, and misconceptions through climate literacy. Physical Geography, 29(6), 512-528. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.29.6.512.
• Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
• Ng, K. T., Parahakaran, S., & Thien, L. M. (2015). Enhancing sustainable awareness through SSYS congress: Challenges and opportunities of e-platforms to promote values-based education. International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 5(2), 79-90.
• Ng, W., & Fergusson, J. (2015). Evaluation of the Smart Science Initiative project. Retrieved on March 3, 2013 from http://www.smartscience.com.au/evaluation/.
• Ng, W., & Fergusson, J. (2017). Technology-Enhanced Science Partnership Initiative: Impact on Secondary Science Teachers. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9619-1.
• Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686-1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618.
• Österlind, K. (2005). Concept formation in environmental education: 14-year olds’ work on the intensified greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038264.
• Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers’ understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031268.72848.6d.
• Pruneau, D., Langis, J., Richard, J. F., Albert, G. & Cormier, M. (2005). The evolution of children’s ideas on pollution in the framework of experiential and socioconstructivist activities. Environment and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2005.006771.
• Pruneau, D., Khattabi, A., & Demers, M. (2010). Challenges and Possibilities in Climate Change Education. US-China Education Review, 7(9), 15-24.
• Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 2 Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis, 14, 971–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x.
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
• US Global change Research Program (2009). Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Science. Retrieved on March 12, 2018 from https://downloads.globalchange.gov/Literacy/climate_literacy_highres_english.pdf.
• Yang, J. C., Chien, K. H., & Liu, T. C. (2012). A digital game-based learning system for energy education: An energy conservation pet. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2).

Vancouver

Ng W. A Partnership-Designed Online Module on Climate Science: Impact on Year 10 Teachers and Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(2):em1660. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100638

APA

Ng, W. (2019). A Partnership-Designed Online Module on Climate Science: Impact on Year 10 Teachers and Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), em1660. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100638

AMA

Ng W. A Partnership-Designed Online Module on Climate Science: Impact on Year 10 Teachers and Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(2), em1660. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100638

Chicago

Ng, Wan. "A Partnership-Designed Online Module on Climate Science: Impact on Year 10 Teachers and Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 2 (2019): em1660. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100638

Harvard

Ng, W. (2019). A Partnership-Designed Online Module on Climate Science: Impact on Year 10 Teachers and Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), em1660. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100638

MLA

Ng, Wan "A Partnership-Designed Online Module on Climate Science: Impact on Year 10 Teachers and Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 2, 2019, em1660. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100638