• Celep, C., & Eminoglu, E. (2010). Primary school teacher’s experience with mobbing and teacher’s self-efficacy perceptions. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4761-4774.
• Chan, P. H. (2012). The study of decision-making capability of administrative management to the schools at the typhoon high risk zone. Journal of Educational Administration Research, 2(1), 203-241.
• Chang, D. R. (2002). Improving the teaching effectiveness of teachers by teaching portfolio. Journal of Education Research, 104, 25-31.
• Chang, D. R., Cho, L. H., & Lee, C. D. (2009). A case study on formative teacher evaluation process and its impact in an elementary school. Curriculum and Instruction Quarterly, 12(3), 265-290.
• Chen, J. L. (2010). A study on teacher professional growth under the teacher professional development evaluation. School Administration, 66, 188-207.
• Chen, T. T. (2011). A study on teacher profession developmental evaluation and its forecast: a case study in Hsinchu County. School Administration, 76, 220-233.
• Cheng, S. H., & Pan, H. L. (2013). Process and outcome evaluation on a national pilot program: a case of secondary school teacher evaluation for professional development. Secondary education, 64(2), 78-97.
• Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social- emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189- 1204.
• Fishler, J. L., & Firestone, W. A. (2006). Teacher learning in a school-university partnership: Exploring the role of social trust and teaching efficacy beliefs. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1155-1188.
• Gabriel, J. G. (2005). How to thrive as a teacher leader. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Harris, D. G. (1985). Faculty and administrative perceptions of post-secondary occupational staff development. University of Houston.
• Hsu, C. C., & Wu, C. H. (2014). Those engaged in the professional development of teachers in remote schools difficulties and suggestions. School Administration, 90, 108-126. doi:10.3966/160683002014030090005.
• Huang, H. P. (2009). Teacher evaluation for professional development: current status, obstacles, and possible solutions. Educational Resources and Research, 89, 71-88.
• Labone, E. (2004). Teacher efficacy: maturing the construct through research in alternative paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 341-359.
• Ministry of Education (2015). All levels of school directory. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1729&Page=24500&Index=6&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecf.
• Pan, W. F. (2012). Case study on choice of school-based teacher evaluation criteria for professional development. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 5(1), 75-98.
• Peers, C. E., Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2003). Supports and concerns for teacher professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 89-110.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
• Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. In UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning. Retrieved from http://www.nnesco.org/iiep.
• Yeung, K. W., & Watkins, D. (2000). Hong Kong student teachers’ personal construction of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 213-235.
• Yu, T. H., & Huang, H. P. (2016). A case study on the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development in a Pingtung County elementary school. Yu Da Academic Journal, 42, 1-14.

APA

Huang, H.-P., & Shih, Y.-H. (2017). A Study of Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes toward Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness in the Remote Districts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5949-5960. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01052a

Vancouver

Huang HP, Shih YH. A Study of Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes toward Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness in the Remote Districts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8):5949-60. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01052a

AMA

Huang HP, Shih YH. A Study of Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes toward Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness in the Remote Districts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8), 5949-5960. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01052a

Chicago

Huang, Hsiu-Ping, and Ya-Hui Shih. "A Study of Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes toward Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness in the Remote Districts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 8 (2017): 5949-5960. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01052a

Harvard

Huang, H.-P., and Shih, Y.-H. (2017). A Study of Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes toward Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness in the Remote Districts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), pp. 5949-5960. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01052a

MLA

Huang, Hsiu-Ping et al. "A Study of Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes toward Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness in the Remote Districts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 8, 2017, pp. 5949-5960. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01052a