• Abraham., M. R., Gryzyboeski, E. B., Renner, J. W. & Marek, A. E. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.
• Açışlı, S. & Turgut, Ü. (2011). The examination of the influence of the materials generated in compliance with 5e learning model on physics laboratory applications. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 532-593.
• Akdeniz, A. R., Yıldız, İ. & Yiğit, N. (2001). 6 th class students’ misconceptions about light subject. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 2(20), 72-78.
• Alptekin, S. & Yılmaz, A. (2007). The effects of the change in the optic curriculum, added into 9th grade classes on the students success. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kirşehir Education Faculty, 8(1), 157-165.
• Andersson, B. & Bach, F. (2005). On designing and evaluating teaching sequences taking geometrical optics as an example. Science Education, 89(2), 196-218. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20044
• Anıl, Ö. & Küçüközer, H. (2010). Identifying 9th grader students’ previous knowledge and misconceptions about plane mirrors. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(3), 104-122.
• Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2007). A study toward teaching the nature of science based on different approaches for classroom teachers in gravity content. Unpublished Phd. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Graduate Studies in Science. Trabzon.
• Ayvacı, Ş. H. (2013). Investigating the effectiveness of predict-observe-explain strategy on teaching photo electricity topic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 548-564. ISSN 1648–3898.
• Ayvacı, H. Ş. & Bakırcı, H. (2012). Analysis of science and technology teachers views about science education process in terms of 5E model. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(2), 132-151.
• Bahadır, H. (2007). The effect of elementary science education based on scientific method process on science process skills, attitude, academic achievement and retention. Hacettepe University, Master’s Thesis, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• Bakırcı, H. (2014). The study on evaluation of designing, implementing, and investigating the effects of teaching material based on common knowledge construction model: Light and voice unit sample. Unpublished Phd. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Graduate Studies in Science, Trabzon.
• Bakırcı, H. & Çalık, M. (2013). Effect of guide materials developed in adaptation and natural selection subject on remedying grade 8 students’ alternative conceptions. Education and Science, 38(168), 215-229.
• Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878. DOI: 10.1021/ed063p873.
• Brooks, J. G. & Brooks M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Bybee, R. (1993). An instructional model for science education. In developing biological literacy. Colorado Spring, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
• Chen, C. C., Lin, H. S. & Lin M. L. (2002). Developing a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding: The formation of images by plane mirror. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Part D. 12 (3), 106-121.
• Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. DOI: 10.1119/1.12989.
• Colin, P., Chauvet, F. & Viennot, L. (2002). Reading images in optics: Students difficulties and teachers views. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 313-332, DOI:10.1080/09500690110078923.
• Çalık, M. (2013). Effect of technology-embedded scientific inquiry on senior science student teachers’ self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 223-232. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2013.931a.
• Çepni, S. (2010). Introduction to research and project studies. Celepler Printing, 4th Edition, Trabzon.
• Epik, Ö., Kalem, R., Kavcar, N. & Çallıca H. (2002). Investigation of the students views about the concepts of light, image formation, and image observation. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Education Faculty Journal, 14: 64-73.
• Fer, S. (2009). Social constructivism and social constructivist curricula in Turkey for the needs of differences of young people: Overview in light of the PROMISE project. In T. Tajmel & S. Klaus (Eds.), Science education unlimited: Approaches to equal opportunity in learning science (pp. 179-199). Münster: Waxmann Verlag Co. Publisher.
• Heywood, D. S. (2005). Primary trainee teachers’ learning and teaching about light: Some pedagogic implications for initial teacher training. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1447-1475, DOI: 10.1080/09500690500153741.
• Hubber, P. (2005). Explorations of year 10 students’ conceptual change during instruction. AsiaPacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-27.
• Kocakülah, A. & Demirci, N. (2010). Secondary school student’s conceptual understanding of image and image formation by a plane mirror. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 141-162.
• Köseoğlu F. & Kavlak, N. (2001). Constructivist approach in science teaching. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 21(1), 139-148.
• Luangrath, P. & Pettersson, S. (2012). Problems and possibilities with centering physics teaching on student discussions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 189-200. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2012.834a.
• Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal, Journal of Science and Technology, 11(2), 121-134. DOI:10.1023/A:1014661312550.
• Naylor, S. & Keogh, B. (1999). Constructivism in classroom: Theory into practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(2). 93-106. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009419914289.
• Nuhoğlu, H. & Yalçın, N. (2004). The development of attitude scale for physics laboratory and the assessment of pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards physics laboratory. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 5(2), 317–327.
• Özmen, H. (2004). Learning theories in science teaching and technology enhanced constructivist learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 100-111.
• Palacios, F. J. P., Cazorla, F. N. & Cervantes, A. (1989). Misconceptions on geometric optics and their association with relevant educational variables. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (3), 273-286. DOI:10.1080/0950069890110304.
• Saxena, A. B. (1991). The understanding of the properties of light by students in India. International Journal of Science Education, 13 (3), 283-289. DOI:10.1080/0950069910130306.
• Taşar, M. S. (2006). Probing pre-service teachers understanding of scientific knowledge by using a vignette in conjunction with a paper and pencil test. Eurasia Journal of of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2(1), 53-70.
• Tekos, G. & Solomonidou, C. (2009). Constructivist learning and teaching of optics concepts using ict tools in Greek primary school: A pilot study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 415-428. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-009-9158-2.
• Tharenou, P., Donohue, R. & Cooper, B. (2007). Management research methods, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Toplis, R. & Allen, M. (2012). I do and I understand?’ Practical work and laboratory use in United Kingdom schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8 (1), 3- 9. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2012.812a.
• Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory a historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12:645-670. DOI:10.1023/A:1025692409001.
• Yeşilyurt, M. (2003). A Constructivist Approach to Basic Physics Laboratory Applications. Unpublished Phd. Thesis. Karadeniz Technical University. Institute of Graduate Studies in Science. Trabzon.
• Yıldırım-Benli, A. (2010). The effects of geometrical optics tasks based on inquiry-based instruction in cooperative learning environment. Dokuz Eylül University, Master’s Thesis, Institute of Graduate Studies in Science, Izmir.

APA

Ayvaci, H. S., Yildiz, M., & Bakirci, H. (2015). An Evaluation of the Instruction Carried Out With Printed Laboratory Materials Designed in Accordance With 5E Model: Reflection of Light And Image on a Plane Mirror. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1677-1695. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1496a

Vancouver

Ayvaci HS, Yildiz M, Bakirci H. An Evaluation of the Instruction Carried Out With Printed Laboratory Materials Designed in Accordance With 5E Model: Reflection of Light And Image on a Plane Mirror. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(6):1677-95. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1496a

AMA

Ayvaci HS, Yildiz M, Bakirci H. An Evaluation of the Instruction Carried Out With Printed Laboratory Materials Designed in Accordance With 5E Model: Reflection of Light And Image on a Plane Mirror. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(6), 1677-1695. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1496a

Chicago

Ayvaci, Hakan Sevki, Mehmet Yildiz, and Hasan Bakirci. "An Evaluation of the Instruction Carried Out With Printed Laboratory Materials Designed in Accordance With 5E Model: Reflection of Light And Image on a Plane Mirror". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 6 (2015): 1677-1695. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1496a

Harvard

Ayvaci, H. S., Yildiz, M., and Bakirci, H. (2015). An Evaluation of the Instruction Carried Out With Printed Laboratory Materials Designed in Accordance With 5E Model: Reflection of Light And Image on a Plane Mirror. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), pp. 1677-1695. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1496a

MLA

Ayvaci, Hakan Sevki et al. "An Evaluation of the Instruction Carried Out With Printed Laboratory Materials Designed in Accordance With 5E Model: Reflection of Light And Image on a Plane Mirror". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 6, 2015, pp. 1677-1695. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1496a