• Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-152.
• Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Brown, D. (1995, April). Theories in pieces? The nature of students’ conceptions and current issues in science education. Paper presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
• Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 257-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Carey, S. (1999). Sources of conceptual change. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, & P. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget’s legacy (pp. 293-326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change in and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 129-160). Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota Press.
• Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of Anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
• Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students' understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467-563.
• Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481- 489.
• diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction 10(2 & 3): 105-225.
• diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• diSessa, A.A., Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2002). J’s epistemological stance and strategies. In G. Sinatra and Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (238-290). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• diSessa, A.A., Gillespie, N., & Esterly, J. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843-900.
• diSessa, A.A., & Sherin, B.L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change, International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1155-1191.
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki (1996). Cognitive & cultural factors in acquisition of intuitive biology. The Handbook of Education & Human Development. Olson and Torrance.
• Harrison, A., G., Grayson, D., J., & Treagust, D., F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student's evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55-87.
• Hewson, P.W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383-396.
• Hewson, M. G., & Hamlyn, J. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal of Science Education, 6, 245-262.
• Hunt, E., & Minstrell, J. (1994). A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics. In K. McGilly (Ed.),Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 51–74). Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
• Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young Children's Thinking about Biological World. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2002). The changing meaning of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2, 5-61.
• Linder, C.J. (1993). A challenge to conceptual change. Science Education, 77, 293-300.
• Linn, M. C., Eylon, B., & Davis, E. A. (2004). The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning. . In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago, the University of Chicago Press.
• McCloskey, M. (1983). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299- 324). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Özdemir, G., & Clark, D.B. (in preparation). Coherence versus fragmentation: A study of Turkish students’ understanding of force.
• Parnafes, O. (submitted). What does “fast” mean? Understanding the physical world through computational representations. The Journal of Learning Science.
• Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed). Kiel: IPN.
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
• Smith, E. L., Blakeslee, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 111-126.
• Smith, J.P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconception reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Science, 3, 115-163.
• Southerland, S.A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C.L. & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students’ explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or pprims. Science Education, 85, 311-327.
• Strike, K.A., & Posner, G.J. (1982). Conceptual change and science teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 4, 231-240.
• Strike, K.A., & Posner, G.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.Duschl & R. Hamilton (eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Tao, P-K. & Gunstone, R.F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 859-882.
• Thaden-Koach, T.C., Dufresne, R.J., & Mestre, J.P. (2006). Coordination of knowledge in judging animated motion, Physics Education Research, 2, 020107.
• Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Ueno, N. (1993). Reconsidering p-prims theory from the viewpoint of situated cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 239-248.
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1992). Mental models of the earth. A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123-183.
• Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1213-1230.
• Wagner, J.F. (2006). Transfer in pieces, Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1-71.
• Wellman, H. M.,&Gelman, S. (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337–375.
• Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday andscientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11, 331–353.
• Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 267-298), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Accociates, Inc.

APA

Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414

Vancouver

Özdemir G, Clark DB. An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(4):351-61. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414

AMA

Özdemir G, Clark DB. An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(4), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414

Chicago

Özdemir, Gökhan, and Douglas B. Clark. "An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2007 3 no. 4 (2007): 351-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414

Harvard

Özdemir, G., and Clark, D. B. (2007). An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), pp. 351-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414

MLA

Özdemir, Gökhan et al. "An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 4, 2007, pp. 351-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414