• Abdullah, S., Wahab, D. A., & Hussein, S. M. (2012). Development of a Quality Assurance Plan in Line with UKM’s Status as a Self-accreditation Institution and Research University. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.251.
• Adwan, J. (2016). Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment. Nurse education today, 41, 67-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.028.
• Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., & Alam, F. (2017). Prospect of eLearning in Higher Education Sectors of Saudi Arabia: A Review. Energy Procedia, 110, 574-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.187.
• Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Zeki, A. M. (2016). A Model of Using Social Media for Collaborative Learning to enhance learners’ Performance on learning. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 29(4), 526-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.09.002.
• Alshumaimeri, Y. (2011). The effects of wikis on foreign language students writing performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 755-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.139.
• Apandi, S. H., & Arshah, R. A. (2015). The Need of Dashboard in Social Research Network Sites for Researchers. International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems, 2(1), 120-132.
• Barak, M., & Levenberg, A. (2016). Flexible thinking in learning: An individual differences measure for learning in technology-enhanced environments. Computers & Education, 99, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.003.
• Becher, M. (2013). Instruction coordinators and higher education accreditation: A study of awareness and assessment documentation use. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 573-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.04.003.
• Beleche, T., Fairris, D., & Marks, M. (2012). Do course evaluations truly reflect student learning? Evidence from an objectively graded post-test. Economics of Education Review, 31, 709– 719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.05.001.
• Bell, C. A., & Youngs, P. (2011). Substance and show: Understanding responses to teacher education programme accreditation processes. Teaching and teacher education, 27(2), 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.012.
• Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. London: Routledge.
• Bourke, T., Ryan, M., & Lloyd, M. (2016). The discursive positioning of graduating teachers in accreditation of teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 1–9.
• Cavanagh, M., Bower, M., Moloney, R., & Sweller, N. (2014). The effect over time of a video-based reflection system on preservice teachers’ oral presentations. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(6), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.3.
• Chmiel, A. S., Shaha, M., & Schneider, D. K. (2017). Introduction of blended learning in a master program: Developing an integrative mixed method evaluation framework. Nurse education today, 48, 172-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.008.
• Creţu, C. M., & Rogoz, N. (2014). Teachers’ Expectations Regarding the Accredited Programs for Professional Development Provided by Universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 660-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.682.
• Davis, S. W., Weed, D., & Forehand, J. W. (2015). Improving the nursing accreditation process. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(1), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2014.09.003.
• De Wever, B., Hämäläinen, R., Voet, M., & Gielen, M. (2015). A wiki task for first-year university students: The effect of scripting students’ collaboration. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.002.
• Debicki, B. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Barnett, T., Pearson, A. W., & Pearson, R. A. (2016). Beyond the Big Five: The mediating role of goal orientation in the relationship between core self-evaluations and academic performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 273-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.002.
• Graffigna, A. M. (2015). Effect of Institutional Evaluation Policies on Private Universities in the Cuyo Region. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 334-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.146.
• Graffigna, A. M., Ghilardi, L., Fraca, C., de los Ángeles Morell, M., Simonassi, M. L., Bartol, R., & Mengual, M. (2014). Universitary Evaluation. From the Program’s Accreditation to the Institutional Evaluation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2635-2639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.626.
• Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The internet and higher education, 18, 4-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003.
• Grover, K. S., Miller, M. T., Swearingen, B., & Wood, N. (2014). An examination of the self-directed learning practices of ESL adult language learners. Journal of Adult Education, 43(2), 12.
• Hashim, A. A., & Majid, M. A. (2015). Effects of Video Display Terminal Resolutions to the Legibility of Text on a Web Page. International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems, 1(1), 131-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.15282/ijsecs.1.2015.11.0011.
• Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006.
• Joseph, J. (2012). The barriers of using education technology for optimizing the educational experience of learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.051.
• Kleebbua, C., & Siriparp, T. (2016). Effects of Education and Attitude on Essential Learning Outcomes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 941-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.061.
• Lancaster, J. W., Wong, A., & Roberts, S. J. (2012). ‘Tech’versus ‘Talk’: A comparison study of two different lecture styles within a Master of Science nurse practitioner course. Nurse education today, 32(5), e14-e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.018.
• Laurillard, D. (2008). Digital technologies and their role in achieving our ambitions for education. Institute of Education, University of London.
• Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2017). University English language learners’ readiness to use computer technology for self-directed learning. System, 67, 99-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.001.
• Lin, C. S., & Wu, R. Y. W. (2016). Effects of Web-Based Creative Thinking Teaching on Students’ Creativity and Learning Outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1675-1684. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1558a.
• Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A Study of the Effects of Digital Learning on Learning Motivation and Learning Outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a.
• Liu, M. H. (2016). Blending a class video blog to optimize student learning outcomes in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 44-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.001.
• Malik, S., & Coldwell-Neilson, J. (2016). Comparison of Traditional and ADRI Based Teaching Approaches in an Introductory Programming Course. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16(1), 267-283.
• Michelson, D. G., Tong, W., & Reeves, L. (2015). Communications education and training: industry certification and university accreditation [Guest Editorial]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(5), 194-195.
• Naidu, P., & Derani, N. E. S. (2016). A Comparative Study on Quality of Education Received by Students of Private Universities versus Public Universities. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00081-2.
• O’Bannon, B., & Britt, V. G. (2011). Creating/developing/using a wiki study guide: Effects on student achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(4), 293-312.
• Ozkan, M. (2015). Wikis and blogs in foreign language learning from the perspectives of learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 672-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.102.
• Pinedo, M., Chiyón, I., & Pérez, F. (2012). The influence of transparency on self-evaluation as part of the university accreditation process in Peru. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1069-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.250.
• Posey, L., & Pintz, C. (2017). Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: Successes, challenges & outcomes. Nurse Education in Practice, 26, 126-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.10.006.
• Ralph, N., Birks, M., & Chapman, Y. (2015). The accreditation of nursing education in Australia. Collegian, 22(1), 3-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2013.10.002.
• Salajan, F. D., & Mount, G. J. (2012). Leveraging the power of Web 2.0 tools: a Wiki platform as a multimedia teaching and learning environment in dental education. Journal of dental education, 76(4), 427-436.
• Schneider, C. G. (2016). Policy Priorities for Accreditation Put Quality College Learning at Risk. Liberal Education, 101(1).
• Schwartzbeck, T. D., & Wolf, M. A. (2012). The Digital Learning Imperative: How Technology and Teaching Meet Today’s Education Challenges. Digital Learning Series. Alliance for Excellent Education.
• Strang, K. D. (2013). University accreditation and benchmarking: Pedagogy that increases student achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 210-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.09.007.
• Trocky, N. M., & Buckley, K. M. (2016). Evaluating the impact of wikis on student learning outcomes: an integrative review. Journal of professional nursing, 32(5), 364-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.007.
• Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 5-23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30221206.
• Wilby, K. J., Zolezzi, M., Rachid, O., & El-Kadi, A. (2017). Development of a college-level assessment framework in line with international accreditation standards: A Middle Eastern perspective. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 115-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.028.
• Wu, T. J., & Tai, Y. N. (2016). Effects of Multimedia Information Technology Integrated Multi-Sensory Instruction on Students’ Learning Motivation and Outcome. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 1065-1074. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1552a.
• Yigit, T., Koyun, A., Yuksel, A. S., & Cankaya, I. A. (2014). Evaluation of blended learning approach in computer engineering education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.140.
• Yousif, M. K., & Shaout, A. (2016). Fuzzy logic computational model for performance evaluation of Sudanese Universities and academic staff. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.08.002.

APA

Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B., Arshah, R. B. A., & Almaroof, R. A. S. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Technology Learning and Assessment Method on Academic Performance: Review Paper. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2241-2254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87117

Vancouver

Tawafak RM, Romli AB, Arshah RBA, Almaroof RAS. Assessing the Impact of Technology Learning and Assessment Method on Academic Performance: Review Paper. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6):2241-54. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87117

AMA

Tawafak RM, Romli AB, Arshah RBA, Almaroof RAS. Assessing the Impact of Technology Learning and Assessment Method on Academic Performance: Review Paper. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6), 2241-2254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87117

Chicago

Tawafak, Ragad M., Awanis BT Romli, Ruzaini bin Abdullah Arshah, and Rana A. Saeed Almaroof. "Assessing the Impact of Technology Learning and Assessment Method on Academic Performance: Review Paper". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 6 (2018): 2241-2254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87117

Harvard

Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B., Arshah, R. B. A., and Almaroof, R. A. S. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Technology Learning and Assessment Method on Academic Performance: Review Paper. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), pp. 2241-2254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87117

MLA

Tawafak, Ragad M. et al. "Assessing the Impact of Technology Learning and Assessment Method on Academic Performance: Review Paper". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 6, 2018, pp. 2241-2254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87117