Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S. T. (1996). Quest: The interactive test analysis system version 2.1. The Australian Council for Educational Research.
• Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
• Arrafii, M. A. (2021). Indonesian teachers’ conceptions of values and dimensions of assessment practice: The effect of teachers’ characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, Article 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103245
• Barton, E. A., & Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09671-6
• Bórquez-Sánchez, E. I. (2025). Experiences from Chile: Secondary school biology teachers’ perspectives on programmes and scientific literacy. Journal of Latinos and Education, 25(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2025.2489985
• Bowser, G., Ho, S. S., Ziebell, A., & Lazendic-Galloway, J. (2024). Networking and collaborating: The role of partnerships across sectors to achieve educational goals in sustainability. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 7, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-024-00080-z
• Bybee, R. W., Bloom, M. V., Phillips, J., Knapp, N., Zander, C., Pence, L., Redmond, T., Lamb, T., Perrin, B., Gionfriddo, D., Rasmussen, L., & Luce, S. (2015). Doing science: The process of scientific inquiry. BSCS: Center for Curriculum Development.
• Cerulli, D., Holbrook, J., & Mander, Ü. (2016). Devising an instrument for determining students’ preparedness for an education through science learning approach within the topic of natural hazards. Science Education International, 27(1), 59-87.
• Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I., & Gimranova, D. (2021). Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: New empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81(1), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
• Dame, A. T. (2022). Combating fake news, disinformation, and misinformation: Experimental evidence for media literacy education. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), Article 2037229. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2037229
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
• Early, J. O., Robillard, A. G., Rooks, R. N., & Smith Romocki, L. (2024). Pedagogy and propaganda in the post-truth era: Examining effective approaches to teaching about mis/disinformation. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 10(3), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799231218936
• Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biostatistics & Biometrics Open Access Journal, 5(6), Article 00149. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
• Fielding, J. (2025). Taking an argumentation approach to statistical investigations: Developing student data-ing practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 57, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01639-y
• Fischetti, J., Ledger, S., Lynch, D., & Donnelly, D. (2022). Practice before practicum: Simulation in initial teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 57(2), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1973167
• Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
• Guo, Q., Qiao, C., & Ibrahim, B. (2022). The mechanism of influence between ICT and students’ science literacy: A hierarchical and structural equation modelling study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(2), 272-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09954-9
• Herman, B. C., Poor, S., Clough, M. P., Rao, A., Kidd, A., De Jesús, D., & Varghese, D. (2024). It’s not just a science thing: Educating future STEM professionals through mis/disinformation responsive instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(8), 1925-1974. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21934
• Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247
• Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692
• Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2020). Students’ perceptions of socio-scientific issue-based learning and their appropriation of epistemic tools for systems thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1759843
• Krajcik, J., Schneider, B., Miller, E. A., Chen, I. C., Bradford, L., Baker, Q., & Peek-Brown, D. (2023). Assessing the effect of project-based learning on science learning in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 60(1), 70-102. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221129247
• Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, Article 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765
• Lin, X. F., Hwang, G. J., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Li, W., Liu, J., & Liang, Z. M. (2023). Effects of a contextualised reflective mechanism-based augmented reality learning model on students’ scientific inquiry learning performances, behavioural patterns, and higher order thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6931-6951. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2057546
• Lowell, B. R., Cherbow, K., & McNeill, K. L. (2021). Redesign or relabel? How a commercial curriculum and its implementation oversimplify key features of the NGSS. Science Education, 105(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21604
• Maeng, J. L., Whitworth, B. A., Bell, R. L., & Sterling, D. R. (2020). The effect of professional development on elementary science teachers’ understanding, confidence, and classroom implementation of reform-based science instruction. Science Education, 104(2), 326-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21562
• Maisyaroh, M., Wiyono, B. B., Chusniyah, T., Adha, M. A., Valdez, A. V., & Lesmana, I. (2024). Existence of independent learning curriculum and portrait of ideal curriculum management in laboratory schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(4), 1187-1196. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21729
• Mayweg-Paus, E., Zimmermann, M., Le, N. T., & Pinkwart, N. (2021). A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2053-2089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10345-7
• Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2023). Education statistics in Indonesia. MoECRT.
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2017). PIRLS 2016 assessment framework. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
• Nida, S., Rahayu, S., & Eilks, I. (2020). A survey of Indonesian science teachers’ experience and perceptions toward socio-scientific issues-based science education. Education Sciences, 10(2), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020039
• Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational assessment of students (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Norambuena-Meléndez, M., Guerrero, G. R., & González-Weil, C. (2023). What is meant by scientific literacy in the curriculum? A comparative analysis between Bolivia and Chile. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18, 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10190-3
• OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: Learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
• OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (volume III) country notes: Indonesia. OECD Publishing.
• Osborne, J. (2023). Science, scientific literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 785-816). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-30
• Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: Informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education, 47(15-16), 2134-2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980
• Ozkan, G., & Umdu, T. U. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 441-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586
• Queiruga-Dios, M. Á., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Vázquez Dorrío, J. B. (2020). Citizen science for scientific literacy and the attainment of sustainable development goals in formal education. Sustainability, 12(10), Article 4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283
• Rachmatullah, A., Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2020). Preservice science teachers’ ecological value orientation: A comparative study between Indonesia and Korea. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1633989
• Roy, G., Sikder, S., & Danaia, L. (2025). Adopting scientific literacy in early years from empirical studies on formal education: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00547-1
• Schleicher, A. (2019). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264300002-en
• Shasha-Sharf, H., & Tal, T. (2023). Energy policy as a socio-scientific issue: Argumentation in the context of economic, environmental and citizenship education. Sustainability, 15(9), Article 7647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097647
• Shehu, B. P., Gjelaj, M., Konjufca, J., Arenliu, A., & Hoxha, R. (2025). Classroom-based experiential learning: Experiences from Kosovo primary schools. Journal of Experiential Education, 48(2), 332-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259241282788
• Son, P. N., Thuong, D. T. K., Hien, N. V. B., & Linh, N. T. T. (2024). Building an innovative learning ecosystem: A model for secondary schools in Hanoi, Vietnam. TEM Journal, 13(3), 2115-2126. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM133-39
• Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x
• Taragin-Zeller, L., Rozenblum, Y., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2022). “We think this way as a society!”: Community-level science literacy among ultra-Orthodox Jews. Public Understanding of Science, 31(8), 1012-1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221110106
• Tonga, F. E., Eryiğit, S., Yalçın, F. A., & Erden, F. T. (2022). Professional development of teachers in PISA achiever countries: Finland, Estonia, Japan, Singapore and China. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689521
• Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation: Critical perspectives about science participation and emancipation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. H. F., & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, Article 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
• Winarni, E. W., Purwandari, E. P., & Raharjo, F. O. (2024). The effect of integrating STEAM and virtual reality using PjBL on scientific literacy in elementary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24991-25011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12853-2
• Wong, J. T., Bui, N. N., Fields, D. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2023). A learning experience design approach to online professional development for teaching science through the arts: Evaluation of teacher content knowledge, self-efficacy and STEAM perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(6), 593-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2112552
• World Bank. (2020). Indonesia education sector assessment: Enhancing learning outcomes. World Bank Publications.

APA

Hastuti, W. S., Putri, A. S., & Kusumah, S. A. (2026). Beyond assessment: Exploring science literacy among Indonesian elementary students through contextual educational analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(6), em2849. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18711

Vancouver

Hastuti WS, Putri AS, Kusumah SA. Beyond assessment: Exploring science literacy among Indonesian elementary students through contextual educational analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(6):em2849. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18711

AMA

Hastuti WS, Putri AS, Kusumah SA. Beyond assessment: Exploring science literacy among Indonesian elementary students through contextual educational analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(6), em2849. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18711

Chicago

Hastuti, Woro Sri, Agnesi Sekarsari Putri, and Sandy Abdi Kusumah. "Beyond assessment: Exploring science literacy among Indonesian elementary students through contextual educational analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 6 (2026): em2849. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18711

Harvard

Hastuti, W. S., Putri, A. S., and Kusumah, S. A. (2026). Beyond assessment: Exploring science literacy among Indonesian elementary students through contextual educational analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(6), em2849. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18711

MLA

Hastuti, Woro Sri et al. "Beyond assessment: Exploring science literacy among Indonesian elementary students through contextual educational analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 6, 2026, em2849. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18711