Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
• Ayub, Y. N. L., Setiawan, I., & Wardana, R. W. (2023). Needs analysis for the development of Arduino microcontroller-based Hooke’s law teaching tool guidebook. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 7(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26693
• Bezerra, I., Schivani, M., & Fontoura, G. (2024). Solar ultraviolet radiation: Didactic prototype and investigations in northeastern Brazil. Physics Education, 59(6), Article 065010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad72c4
• Bouquet, F., Bobroff, J., Fuchs-Gallezot, M., & Maurines, L. (2017). Project-based physics labs using low-cost open-source hardware. American Journal of Physics, 85(3), 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4972043
• Bulus, E., & Basaran, B. (2019). Investigation of the effect of the integration of Arduino to electrical experiments on students’ attitudes towards technology and ICT by the mixed method. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.31
• Castro, T. J. (2020). Using Grätzel cells as Arduino-controlled photosensors: Proposals for the insertion of nanoscience and nanotechnology in classroom. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 42. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2020-0072
• Chaudry, A. M. (2020). Using Arduino Uno microcontroller to create interest in physics. The Physics Teacher, 58(6), 418-421. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001841
• Çoban, A. (2020a). Determination of kinetic friction coefficient using an Arduino. Physics Education, 55(6), Article 063009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abb88a
• Çoban, A. (2020b). Using Arduino in physics experiments: Determining the speed of sound in air. Physics Education, 55(5), Article 055004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab94d6
• Coban, A., & Erol, M. (2025). Impact of Arduino based stem education on cognitive domain level of mechanics and scientific creativity. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.12.4.2231
• Dökme, İ., & Hancıoğlu, Z. Ş. (2025). Three-stage robotic STEM program ignites secondary school students’ interest in STEM career and attitudes toward science. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12079-12100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13318-w
• Doucette, D., D’Urso, B., & Singh, C. (2020). Lessons from transforming second-year honors physics lab. American Journal of Physics, 88(10), 838-844. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001641
• Farcas, L., Enachescu, C., & Neculau, B. (2024). Boosting the study of physics for high-school students through non-formal activities with small robotics devices. Romanian Reports in Physics, 76(2), 904-904. https://doi.org/10.59277/romrepphys.2024.76.904
• Fauza, N. (2023). Microcontroller-based mechanics experiments in physics learning: Systematic literature review using PRISMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 558-568. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5258
• Galeriu, C. (2018). An Arduino investigation of Newton’s law of cooling. The Physics Teacher, 56(9), 618-620. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5080580
• García-Tudela, P. A., & Marín-Marín, J.-A. (2023). Use of Arduino in primary education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(2), Article 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020134
• Ghai, G., Raj, R., & Kaur, R. (2022). An inclusive science laboratory for visually impaired students. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(2), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v36i2/22157
• Gkiolmas, A., Dimakos, C., Chalkidis, A., & Stoumpa, A. (2020). An environmental education project that measures particulate matter via an Arduino interface. Sustainable Futures, 2, Article 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100027
• Hachmi, A., El Hadi, M., Essaadaoui, R., Mommadi, O., Ouariach, A., & El Moussaouy, A. (2022). Development of an educational device, based on Arduino, to facilitate the understanding of light diffraction. Physics Education, 57(4), Article 045032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac65d0
• Hadiati, S., Kuswanto, H., Rosana, D., & Pramuda, A. (2019). The effect of laboratory work style and reasoning with Arduino to improve scientific attitude. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12221a
• Herendi, B., & Jenei, P. (2025). Interactive physics education with Arduino: Determining altitude and flow rate by measuring air pressure. Physics Education, 60(5), Article 055032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/adf933
• Huda, I., Girei, M. M., & Keizi, F. (2023). Development of a practical tool for linear momentum collisions using a microcontroller. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 1(2), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v1i2.788
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
• Karakotsou, C., & Zafiriadis, I. (2023). Teaching uniform linear motion using an Arduino sensor and a smartphone device. Physics Education, 58(2), Article 025013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acace2
• Kircher, E., Girwidz, R., & Fischer, H. E. (Eds.). (2015). Physikdidaktik [Physics education]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
• Kondaveeti, H. K., Kumaravelu, N. K., Vanambathina, S. D., Mathe, S. E., & Vappangi, S. (2021). A systematic literature review on prototyping with Arduino: Applications, challenges, advantages, and limitations. Computer Science Review, 40, Article 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100364
• Koumara, A., Bakaloglou, M., & Polatoglou, H. M. (2024). Applying design thinking to teach physics and mathematics: A case study on building a parachute and analyzing its properties. World Journal of Education, 14(4), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v14n4p22
• Koyimah, K., Widodo, W., Suprapto, N., & Prahani, B. K. (2020). Effectiveness of interactive microcontroller based speed sensors to improve students’ analytic thinking skills. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 16(09), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i09.15185
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
• Kuan, W.-H., Tseng, C.-H., Chen, S., & Wong, C.-C. (2016). Development of a computer-assisted instrumentation curriculum for physics students: Using LabVIEW and Arduino platform. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9603-y
• Kubínová, Š., & Šlégr, J. (2015). Physics demonstrations with the Arduino board. Physics Education, 50(4), 472-474. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/50/4/472
• Lee, E. (2020a). A meta-analysis of the effects of Arduino-based education in Korean primary and secondary schools in engineering education. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1503-1512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1503
• Lee, E. (2020b). Developing a low-cost microcontroller-based model for teaching and learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 921-934. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.921
• Lotriet, H. H., & Gouws, P. M. (2025). Educational robotics in physics education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 62(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2025.2455334
• Lucenko, G., Kuzminskyi, A., & Burchak, S. (2020). Organising the process of physics students’ cognitive activity. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3449-3458. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080819
• Marín-Marín, J.-A., García-Tudela, P. A., & Duo-Terrón, P. (2024). Computational thinking and programming with Arduino in education: A systematic review for secondary education. Heliyon, 10(8), Article e29177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29177
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369
• Mendes, G. A., da Costa e Silva, J., & de O. G. Rebouças, G. (2023). Instantaneous measurement of the speed of sound in air and water using Arduino. The Physics Teacher, 61(5), 394-395. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0118245
• Moghimi-Araghi, S. (2025). Teaching an acoustics lab remotely during the pandemic and beyond. The Physics Teacher, 63(7), 591-594. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0204272
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
• Monteiro, J. A., Vilhena, M. de F., Silva, F. H. S. da, Lucena, I. C. R. de, & Coutinho Júnior, A. de L. (2022). Arduino no ensino de física: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura de 2011 a 2021 [Arduino in physics education: A systematic literature review from 2011 to 2021]. Amazônia: Revista de Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas, 18(40), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.18542/amazrecm.v18i40.12175
• Moya, A. A. (2018). An Arduino experiment to study free fall at schools. Physics Education, 53(5), Article 055020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aad4c6
• Neto, S. C. M., Silva, V. M. L., Silva, J. W. C., & Sousa, R. R. (2021). Plataforma de prototipagem arduino no ensino da física: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura [Arduino prototype platform in physics teaching: A systematic literature review]. Brazilian Journal of Development, 7(7), 65714-65737. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n7-039
• Ntourou, V., Kalogiannakis, M., & Psycharis, S. (2021). A study of the impact of Arduino and visual programming in self-efficacy, motivation, computational thinking and 5^th grade students’ perceptions on electricity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5), Article em1960. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10842
• Omari, S., Mamane, A., Daoui, A., Ouahi, M. B., & Benjelloun, N. (2023). Investigating the effect of a proposed educational robot on students’ motivation and learning of thermodynamic concepts. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(7), 1085-1093. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.7.1908
• Organtini, G., & Tufino, E. (2022). Effectiveness of a laboratory course with Arduino and smartphones. Education Sciences, 12(12), Article 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120898
• Pabuçcu Akış, A. (2024). Using Arduino in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Bibliometric analysis. Science Education International, 35(2), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i2.1
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
• Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). Orion Press.
• Prabowo, N. K., & Irwanto, I. (2023). The implementation of Arduino microcontroller boards in science: A bibliometric analysis from 2008 to 2022. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(2), 106-123. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v37i2/23154
• Prahani, B. K., Hariyono, E., Saphira, H. V., Zakhiyah, I., Eliezanatalie, S., & Ismail 4, M. H. (2025). Digitalization of physics laboratory tools: Increase undergraduate students learning motivation and problem-solving skills. TEM Journal, 14(3), 2371-2380. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem143-42
• Pusch, A., Ubben, M. S., Laumann, D., Heinicke, S., & Heusler, S. (2021). Real-time data acquisition using Arduino and Phyphox: Measuring the electrical power of solar panels in contexts of exposure to light in physics classroom. Physics Education, 56(4), Article 045001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abe993
• Redish, E. F. (2004). Teaching physics with the physics suite. American Journal of Physics, 72(3), 414-414. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1691552
• Rivera-Ortega, U., Hernández-Montero, P., & Hugo-Teutli. (2023). Interactive STEM educational resource regarding to the projectile motion phenomenon on inclined plane. Physics Education, 58(3), Article 035017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acbf1c
• Růžička, M., Rejthárek, M., & Major, Š. (2018). Project-based learning in basic course of technical physics: Computer-controlled experiments and Agros2D modeling. WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, 13, 46-52.
• Schiavon, G. J., Pittner, V. D., Santos, O. R., Batista, M. C., & Braga, W. S. (2023). Experimental activities for the study of transformation of electrical energy into thermal. Physics Education, 58(5), Article 055020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acea51
• Schnider, D., & Hömöstrei, M. (2023a). Electrical conductance lab: A low-cost, simple and useful project with Arduino. Physics Education, 58(6), Article 065023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acf817
• Schnider, D., & Hömöstrei, M. (2023b). Exoplanets: An easy, practice-oriented and fun project with Arduino. Physics Education, 58(5), Article 055004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ace1c9
• Schnider, D., & Hömöstrei, M. (2024). Arduino-supported kinematics measurements. Physics Education, 59(5), Article 055015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad672a
• Setya, S. C., Krismadinata, Ganefri, & Weriza, J. (2024). Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of microcontroller learning development in the Industry 4.0. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 20(S7), 873-896. https://doi.org/10.62441/nano-ntp.v20is7.73
• Sousa, A., Rodrigues, P., Maia-Lima, C., Pinto, A., & Barbot, A. (2020). Learning about UV radiation and sustainability with Arduino and sensors. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(Special Issue), 422-434.
• Sukmak, W., & Musik, P. (2022). Real-time graphing of simple harmonic motion of mass on springs with an Arduino based on an experiment set for teaching and learning physics. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 114-130.
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
• Ubaidillah, M., Marwoto, P., Wiyanto, W., Subali, B., Widiyatmoko, A., & Cahyono, A. N. (2025). A systematic literature review on trends in the use of science experiments in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(3), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i3.8221
• Uzal, G. (2022) The use of Arduino in physics laboratories. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 88-100.
• Vergara, K., Rossel, P. O., & Herskovic, V. (2025). Understanding the use of physical computing in K-12 education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 48, Article 100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100705
• Vidal, J., Bravo, D. A., & Rengifo, C. F. (2022). Teaching physical sciences using Arduino physics lab at the Universidad del Cauca. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 17(3), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2022.3191266
• Vitkóczi, F., Jenei, P., Piláth, K., & Kopasz, K. (2025). Practical STEM project with Arduino: Classroom applications and constructing thermodynamic measurement tool. Physics Education, 60(4), Article 045015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/add980
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Walkup, J. R., Key, R. A., & Talbot, P. R. M. (2019). Timing a light pulse in the introductory physics lab. Physics Education, 54(4), Article 045007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab15b4
• Wibowo, F. C., Maemunah, A. N., Nasbey, H., Costu, B., Prahani, B. K., Permana, N. D., Darman, D. R., & Samsudin, A. (2023). Development of simple kits (SK) refraction of light using photodiode sensors for student understanding. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, (2), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002728
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196322
• Yasin, A. I., Prima, E. C., & Sholihin, H. (2018). Learning electricity using Arduino-Android based game to improve STEM literacy. Journal of Science Learning, 1(3), Article 77. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v1i3.11789
• Zárate-Navarro, M. A., Schiavone-Valdez, S. D., Cuevas, J. E., Warren-Vega, W. M., Campos-Rodríguez, A., & Romero-Cano, L. A. (2024). STEM activities for heat transfer learning: Integrating simulation, mathematical modeling, and experimental validation in transport phenomena education. Education for Chemical Engineers, 49, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2024.06.004

APA

Saramati, B., Vidak, A., & Mešić, V. (2026). Learning physics with microcontrollers: A systematic review of empirical research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(6), em2848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18710

Vancouver

Saramati B, Vidak A, Mešić V. Learning physics with microcontrollers: A systematic review of empirical research. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(6):em2848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18710

AMA

Saramati B, Vidak A, Mešić V. Learning physics with microcontrollers: A systematic review of empirical research. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(6), em2848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18710

Chicago

Saramati, Besnik, Andrej Vidak, and Vanes Mešić. "Learning physics with microcontrollers: A systematic review of empirical research". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 6 (2026): em2848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18710

Harvard

Saramati, B., Vidak, A., and Mešić, V. (2026). Learning physics with microcontrollers: A systematic review of empirical research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(6), em2848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18710

MLA

Saramati, Besnik et al. "Learning physics with microcontrollers: A systematic review of empirical research". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 6, 2026, em2848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18710