• Abeles, T. P. (2014). The fate of academic publishing and academia in a semantic environment. On the Horizon, 22(4), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-06-2014-0022.
• Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574.
• Allahar, H. (2017). Academic Publishing, Internet Technology, and Disruptive Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1120.
• Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing Learners’ Academic Writing Skills in Higher Education: A Study for Educational Reform. Language and Education, 16(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780208666826.
• Badenhorst, C., & Xu, X. (2016). Academic Publishing: Making the Implicit Explicit. Publications, 4(3), Article number UNSP 24, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030024.
• Badenhorst, C. M. (2018). Graduate student writing: Complexity in literature reviews. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00031.
• Badley, G. (2009). Publish and be doctor‐rated: the PhD by published work. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910992313.
• Badley, G. (2014). Pragmatist supervision of doctoral writers. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(4), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2013-0027].
• Barrass, R. (1990). Scientific writing for publication: a guide for beginners. Journal of Biological Education, 24(3), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1990.9655137.
• Bastalich, W., Behrend, M., & Bloomfield, R. (2014). Is non-subject based research training a ‘waste of time’, good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860106.
• Bastug, M., Ertem, I. S., & Keskin, H. K. (2017). A phenomenological research study on writer’s block: causes, processes, and results. Education + Training, 59(6), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2016-0169.
• Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029.
• Beall, J. (2018). Predatory journals exploit structural weaknesses in scholarly publishing. 4open, 1 (2018), Article Number 1, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1051/fopen/2018001.
• Belcher, W. L. (2009). Reflections on ten years of teaching writing for publication to graduate students and junior faculty. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40(2), 184–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.40.2.184.
• Berg, L. D. (2012). Knowledge enclosure, accumulation by dispossession, and the academic publishing industry. Political Geography, 31(5), 260–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.05.011.
• Bianchini, S., Lissoni, F., Pezzoni, M., & Zirulia, L. (2016). The economics of research, consulting, and teaching quality: theory and evidence from a technical university. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(7), 668–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1114340.
• Borgstrom, L. (2016). Teaching Publishing as Information Technology: A Description of a Structural Editing Curriculum at a South African University. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(4), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.4.328.
• Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J., … James, C. (2013). ‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1150–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777406.
• Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching Doctoral Students to Become Scholarly Writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000.
• Callaghan, C. W. (2014). Research Productivity and Values. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n1p453.
• Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104.
• Casanave, C. P., & Li, Y. (2015) Novices’ Struggles with Conceptual and Theoretical Framing in Writing Dissertations and Papers for Publication. Publications, 3(2), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3020104.
• Cruz, L., & Fleming, R. (2015). Partnerships: the engaged university and library publishing. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 31(4), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-02-2014-0017.
• Dawson, A. (2010). Academic Freedom and the Digital Revolution. AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom, 1, 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/Dawson.pdf.
• Devlin, M., & Radloff, A. (2014). A structured writing programme for staff: Facilitating knowledge, skills, confidence and publishing outcomes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.722194.
• Dickson‐Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., Talbot, L., Verrinder, G., & Ward, B. (2009). A non‐residential alternative to off campus writers’ retreats for academics. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903026156.
• Donabedian, D. A., & Carey, J. (2011). Pirates and Librarians: Big Media, Technology, and the Role of Liberal Education. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2011(SEPT), Article number 557, 1–15. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1588&context=libphilprac.
• Edmondson, R., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). Writing sociology, publishing sociology. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 3(4), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2016.1245244.
• El Ouardighi, F., Kogan, K., & Vranceanu, R. (2013). Publish or teach? Analysis of the professor’s optimal career path. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(10), 1995–2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2013.05.007.
• Elton, L. (2010). Academic writing and tacit knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003619979.
• Faria, J. R., Wanke, P. F., Ferreira, J. J., Mixon, Jr., F. G. (2018). Research and innovation in higher education: empirical evidence from research and patenting in Brazil. Scientometrics, 116(1), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2744-4.
• Fendt, J. (2013). Lost in Translation? On Mind and Matter in Management Research. SAGE Open, 3(2), Article number 215824401348135, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013481358.
• Fernsten, L. A., & Reda, M. (2011). Helping students meet the challenges of academic writing. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507306.
• Ford, J. D., & Wei, T. (2015). Quad Charts in the Classroom to Reinforce Technical Communication Fundamentals. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281615578848.
• Forgues, B. & Liarte, S. (2013). Academic Publishing: Past and Future. M@n@gement, 16(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.165.0739.
• Foster, D. H. (2017) A Concise Guide to Communication in Science and Engineering. New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN: 978-0-1987-0424-9 (pbk).
• Fox, G. A., Kuster, E. L., & Fox, A. K. (2017). The Importance of Scientific Publishing: Teaching an Undergraduate How to Swim the Entire Length of the Pool. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 160(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2017.03236.x.
• Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017, May 25). Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. CERN: Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100.
• Galin, J. R., & Latchaw, J. (2010). From Incentive to Stewardship: The Shifting Discourse of Academic Publishing. Computers and Composition, 27(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2010.06.010.
• Garbati, J., & Samuels, B. (2013). Publishing in Educational Research Journals: Are Graduate Students Participating? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 44(4), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.44-4-004.
• Garside, J., Bailey, R., Tyas, M., Ormrod, G., Stone, G., Topping, A., & Gillibrand, W. P. (2015). Developing a culture of publication: a joint enterprise writing retreat. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(2), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2014-0065.
• Gastel, B., & Day, R. A. (2016). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, ISBN: 978-1-4408-4280-1 (pbk).
• Gillman, L., Halmos, P. R., Flanders, H., & Shube, B. (1975). Four Panel Talks on Publishing - Why publish - What to publish - Publication related to teaching - How to publish. The American Mathematical Monthly, 82(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2319128.
• Grant, B., & Knowles, S. (2000). Flights of imagination: Academic women be(com)ing writers. International Journal for Academic Development, 5(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/136014400410060.
• Grech, V. (2017). WASP – Write a Scientific Paper course: why and how. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 40(3), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2017.1366825.
• Gu, X., & Blackmore, K. (2014). The publishing game: An analysis of “Game” related academic publishing patterns. In Blackmore K., Nesbitt K., Smith S.P. (Ed.), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment – IE2014 (Vol. 02-03-December-2014, pp. 1–6). New York: ACM, ISBN: 978-1-4503-2790-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677758.2677759.
• Gu, X., & Blackmore, K. L. (2015). A systematic review of agent-based modelling and simulation applications in the higher education domain. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1011088.
• Gu, X., Blackmore, K., Cornforth, D., & Nesbitt, K. (2015). Modelling academics as agents: An implementation of an agent-based strategic publication model. JASSS-The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2725.
• Gupta, S., Search, A., Durao, F. A., & McDonough, T. (2017). Entrepreneurial Literary Theory: A Debate on Research and the Future of Academia. London: Shot in the Dark. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/50602.
• Habib, M. M., & Pathik, B. B. (2012). An Investigation of Education and Research Management for Tertiary Academic Institutions. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5772/45735.
• Haralambides, H. E. (2016). Dos and don’ts in scholarly publishing. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 18(2), 101–102. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2016.19.
• Haralambides, H.E. (2018). Dos and don’ts of scholarly publishing (part II). Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-018-0111-2.
• Harper, R., & Vered, K. O. (2017). Developing communication as a graduate outcome: using ‘Writing Across the Curriculum’ as a whole-of-institution approach to curriculum and pedagogy. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238882.
• Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students As Partners, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472.
• Herb, U. (2010). Sociological implications of scientific publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy and the digital divide. First Monday, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i2.2599.
• Hermanowicz, J. C., & Clayton, K. A. (2018). Contemporary Academic Publishing: Democratization and Differentiation in Careers. Journal of Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1441109.
• Ho, M.-C. (2017). Navigating scholarly writing and international publishing: Individual agency of Taiwanese EAL doctoral students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.02.004.
• Howard, S. K., Khosronejad, M., & Calvo, R. A. (2016). Exploring Engineering instructors’ views about writing and online tools to support communication in Engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1228612.
• Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2017). Graduate students as academic writers: writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881.
• Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005.
• Jackson, L., Peters, M. A., Benade, L., Devine, N., Arndt, S., Forster, D., ... Ozoliņš, J. (2018). Is peer review in academic publishing still working? Open Review of Educational Research, 5(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139.
• Jalongo, M. R. (2012). Getting on the Conference Program and Writing a Practical Article: Templates for Success. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0533-x.
• Jeyaraj, J. (2016). Linear narratives, arbitrary relationships: Mimesis and direct communication for effectively representing engineering realities multimodally. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(1), 56–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616641926.
• Johnson, E. M. (2017). The doctoral writing conversation: establishing a generic doctoral writing programme. Open Review of Educational Research, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1419439.
• Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049236.
• Kempenaar, L. E., & Murray, R. (2016). Writing by academics: a transactional and systems approach to academic writing behaviours. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139553.
• Kent, A., Berry, D. M., Budds, K., Skipper, Y., & Williams, H. L. (2017). Promoting writing amongst peers: establishing a community of writing practice for early career academics. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1194–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1300141.
• King, G. (2006). Publication, Publication. PS - Political Science and Politics, 39(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060252.
• Knochel, A. D., & Patton, R. M. (2014). As we may publish: Digital scholarship and the future(s) of art education. International Journal of Education Through Art, 10(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta.10.3.269_1.
• Kopelman, S., Lytle, A. L., Wang, C. S., Lewicki, R. J., Murnighan, J. K., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015). Done But Not Published: The Dissertation Journeys of Roy J. Lewicki and J. Keith Murnighan. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(4), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12063.
• Kornhaber, R., Cross, M., Betihavas, V., & Bridgman, H. (2016). The benefits and challenges of academic writing retreats: an integrative review. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1210–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144572.
• Kossi, Y., Lesueur, J.-Y., Sabatier, M. (2016). Publish or teach? The role of the scientific environment on academics’ multitasking. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(3), Article number dtv038, 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv038.
• Kostikov, A. A., Perig, A. V., & Lozun, R. R. (2017). Simulation-assisted teaching of graduate students in transport: A case study of the application of acausal freeware JModelica.org to solution of Sakawa’s open-loop optimal control problem for payload motion during crane boom rotation. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 45(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419016669033.
• Krause, K.-L. (2001). The University Essay Writing Experience: A pathway for academic integration during transition. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123586.
• Kretzenbacher, H. L. (2017). “The wording is on occasion somewhat emotional”. Fachsprache, 39(1-2), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v34i1-2.1261.
• Kubiatko, M. (2017). Not Every Predatory Journal is Really Predatory Journal. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6041–6043. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00829a.
• Lafferty, S., & Edwards, J. (2004). Disruptive technologies: what future universities and their libraries? Library Management, 25(6/7), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120410699636.
• Langenkamp, K., Rödel, B., Taufenbach, K., & Weiland, M. (2018). Open Access in Vocational Education and Training Research. Publications, 6(3), Article number 29, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6030029.
• Lax, J. (2002). Academic writing for international graduate students. In 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education; Leading a Revolution in Engineering and Computer Science Education (Vol. 2, 2002, pp. F3H/8-F3H/12). Boston: IEEE, Print ISSN: 0190-5848. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158212.
• Lax, J. (2014). Laying a foundation for academic writing in engineering: Helping international graduate students write in English. In 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, IPCC 2014 (Vol. 2015-January, 23 January 2015, Article number 7020353, pp. 1–4). Pittsburgh: IEEE, Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4799-3749-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020353.
• Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.
• Lea, M. R. (2004). Academic literacies: a pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230.
• Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing Groups, Change and Academic Identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058109.
• Lee, A., & Kamler, B. (2008). Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334723.
• Lee, A., & Murray, R. (2015). Supervising writing: helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329.
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202.
• Leyden, J. A., & Olds, B. M. (2007). Publishing in Scientific and Engineering Contexts: A Course for Graduate Students. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2006.885863.
• Lillis, T., & Turner, J. (2001). Student Writing in Higher Education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029608.
• Lillis, T., Magyar, A., & Robinson‐Pant, A. (2010). An international journal’s attempts to address inequalities in academic publishing: developing a writing for publication programme. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(6), 781–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2010.523250.
• Lillis, T. (2003). Student Writing as ‘Academic Literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to Move from Critique to Design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848.
• Liu, Y. X. (2017) Study on Cooperative Teaching Mode of Digital Publishing Courses in the Internet Era. In McAnally, E., Volodina, T., Zhang, Y., & Solovjeva, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Economy, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2016). AEBMR-Advances in Economics Business and Management Research (Vol. 20, pp. 480-482). Moscow: Atlantis Press, ISSN: 2352-5428. https://doi.org/10.2991/emle-16.2017.108.
• Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E., & Lee, A. (2008). ‘Becoming and being writers’: the experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370802439870.
• Mahmud, S., & Bretag, T. (2015). Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(6), 1657–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9616-y.
• McCaffrey, K. (2016). Bibliotherapy: How Public Libraries can Support their Communities’ Mental Health. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 12, Article number 6452, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v12i1.6452.
• McCluskey, F. B., & Winter, M. L. (2014). Academic freedom in the digital age. On the Horizon, 22(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2013-0033.
• McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053.
• Mertkan, S., Arsan, N., Inal Cavlan, G., & Onurkan Aliusta, G. (2017). Diversity and equality in academic publishing: the case of educational leadership. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1136924.
• Moore, S. (2003). Writers’ retreats for academics: exploring and increasing the motivation to write. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000098734.
• Morris, M. (1998). Publishing perils, and how to survive them: A guide for graduate students. Cultural Studies, 12(4), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.1998.10383117.
• Moskovkin, V. M. (2013). The construction of academic publishing and terminological structures using the Google Scholar search engine: An example of environmental terms in publications at the classical universities of Kharkiv and Skopje. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 40(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688213010024.
• Murray, R., & Newton, M. (2009). Writing retreat as structured intervention: margin or mainstream? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903154126.
• Natarajan, A. (2007). What, where, and how to publish. BMJ, 334(7600), 161–162. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.334.7600.s161.
• Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: a qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 572–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598.
• Osswald, A., Schoepfel, J., & Jacquemin, B. (2016). Continuing Professional Education in Open Access – A French-German Survey. LIBER Quarterly, 26(2), 43–66. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10158.
• Øvretveit, J. (2008). Writing a scientific publication for a management journal. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 22(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260810876349.
• Oyibo, S. O. (2017). Involving junior doctors in medical article publishing: is it an effective method of teaching? Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 8, 669–674. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S147431.
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222.
• Paltridge, B. (2015). Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: when is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818641.
• Passehl-Stoddart, E. & Monge, R., (2014). From Freshman to Graduate: Making the Case for Student-Centric Institutional Repositories. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(3), Article number eP1130, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1130.
• Pearce, J. M. (2012). Open Source Research in Sustainability. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 5(4), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.1089/SUS.2012.9944.
• Perig, A. V., Kostikov, A. A., Skyrtach, V. M., Lozun, R. R., & Stadnik, A. N. (2017). Application of JModelica.org to teaching the fundamentals of dynamics of Foucault pendulum-like guided systems to engineering students. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 62(6), 151–178. Retrieved from https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1926.
• Perig, A. V. (2017). How to teach students to make a simple experimental visualization of the macroscopic rotational modes of large deformations during pressure forming. Journal of Materials Education, 39(5-6), 193–208. Retrieved from https://icme.unt.edu/Vol.39issue5-6(2017).pdf.
• Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2015). Philosophy of education in the age of digital reason. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 14, 162–181. Retrieved from https://addletonacademicpublishers.com/contents-rcp/429-volume-14-2015/2522-philosophy-of-education-in-the-age-of-digital-reason.
• Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., … Benade, L. (2016). Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(14), 1401–1425. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1240987.
• Petrova, P., & Coughlin, A. (2012). Using structured writing retreats to support novice researchers. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511211278661.
• Pihlström, S. (2014). Academic publishing and interdisciplinarity: Finnish experiences. Human Affairs, 24(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0204-2.
• Pirie, I. (2009). The Political Economy of Academic Publishing. Historical Materialism, 17(3), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1163/146544609X12469428108466.
• Pope, D., Roper, C., & Qualter, P. (2012). The influence of emotional intelligence on academic progress and achievement in UK university students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.583981.
• Quinn, B. (2002). How Psychotherapists Handle Difficult Clients. The Reference Librarian, 36(75-76), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v36n75_17.
• Ransdell, L. B., Dinger, M. K., Cooke, C., & Beske, S. (2001). Factors Related to Publication Productivity in a Sample of Female Health Educators. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(5), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.25.5.4.
• Rathert, S., & Okan, Z. (2015). Writing for publication as a tool in teacher development. ELT Journal, 69(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv029.
• Read, B., Francis, B., & Robson, J. (2001). ‘Playing Safe’: Undergraduate essay writing and the presentation of the student ‘voice’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690124289.
• Richard, J., Plimmer, G., Fam, K.-S., & Campbell, C. (2015). Publishing success of marketing academics: antecedents and outcomes. European Journal of Marketing, 49(1/2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2013-0311.
• Roberts, A., & Weston, K. (2014). Releasing the hidden academic? Learning from teacher-educators’ responses to a writing support programme. Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.835277.
• Robinson, K. P., Nelson, K. S., & Lewis, J. C. (2018). Thesis consultation: a review. Reference Services Review, 46(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-04-2017-0009.
• Rogach, O. V., Frolova, E. V., & Ryabova, T. M. (2017). Academic competition: Rating race. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.2.297.
• Sabouni, A., Chaar, A., Bdaiwi, Y., Masrani, A., Abolaban, H., Alahdab, F., ..., Al‑Moujahed, A. (2017). An online academic writing and publishing skills course: Help Syrians find their voice. Avicenna Journal of Medicine, 7(3), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.AJM_204_16.
• Salubi, O. G., Ondari-Okemwa, E., Nekhwevha, F. (2018). Utilisation of library information resources among generation Z students: Facts and fiction. Publications, 6(2), Article number 16, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6020016.
• Samraj, B. (2016). Discourse structure and variation in manuscript reviews: Implications for genre categorization. English for Specific Purposes, 42, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.12.003.
• Saper, C. B. (2014). Academic publishing, part II: Where to publish your work. Annals of Neurology, 76(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24212.
• Saper, C. B. (2014). Academic publishing, part III: How to write a research paper (so that it will be accepted) in a high-quality journal. Annals of Neurology, 77(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24317.
• Saper, C. B. (2014). Academic publishing, part I: Peering into the review process. Annals of Neurology, 75(2), 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24095.
• Schuermans, N., Meeus, B., & De Maesschalck, F. (2010). Is there a world beyond the Web of Science? Publication practices outside the heartland of academic geography. Area, 42(4), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00938.x.
• Schultz, J. L., Agrimonti, L. M., & Higbee, J. L. (2016). Integrating Academic Journal Review Assignments Into A Graduate Business Leadership Course. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 9(2), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v9i2.9612.
• Seehusen, D. A., & Miser, W. F. (2006). Teaching the outstanding medical learner. Family Medicine, 38(10), 731–735. Retrieved from http://www.stfm.org/fmhub/fm2006/November/Dean731.pdf.
• Seidl, A., Wrzaczek, S., El Ouardighi, F., & Feichtinger, G. (2016). Optimal Career Strategies and Brain Drain in Academia. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 168(1), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-015-0747-3.
• Seiradakis, E., & Spantidakis, I. (2018). Training undergraduate engineering students to read research articles: A qualitative think-aloud study. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference - Emerging Trends and Challenges of Engineering Education, EDUCON 2018 (Vol. 2018-April, 23 May 2018, pp. 1208-1213). Tenerife: IEEE, Electronic ISSN: 2165-9567. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363367.
• Sheehan, N. T., Gujarathi, M. R., Jones, J. C., & Phillips, F. (2017). Using Design Thinking to Write and Publish Novel Teaching Cases: Tips From Experienced Case Authors. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917741179.
• Shortlidge, E. E., & Eddy, S. L. (2018). The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth? PLoS ONE, 13(6), Article number e0199576, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576.
• Smeyers, P., & Burbules, N. C. (2011). How to Improve your Impact Factor: Questioning the Quantification of Academic Quality. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00787.x.
• Smith, M. Can Online Peer Review Assignments Replace Essays in Third Year University Courses? And if so, What are the Challenges? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(1), 147–158. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/issue/download.html?idArticle=173.
• Spence, C. (2018). ‘Judgement’ versus ‘metrics’ in higher education management. Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0300-z.
• Stanley, C. A. (2007). When Counter Narratives Meet Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-Review Process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X06298008.
• Stoilescu, D. & McDougall, D. (2010). Starting to Publish Academic Research as a Doctoral Student. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 79–92. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume5/IJDSv5p079-092Stoilescu299.pdf.
• Stone, W. R., & Sevgi, L. (2015). Aspects of Academic Publishing [Testing Ourselves]. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 57(6), Article number 7362305, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2015.2488590.
• Stone, G., Jensen, K., & Beech, M. (2016). Publishing Undergraduate Research: Linking Teaching and Research through a Dedicated Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.2.147.
• Stover, M. (2004). The Reference Librarian as Non-Expert: A Postmodern Approach to Expertise. The Reference Librarian, 42(87-88), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v42n87_10.
• Styles, I., & Radloff, A. (2001). The Synergistic Thesis: Student and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770020030533.
• Swauger, S. (2017). Open access, power, and privilege: A response to “What I learned from predatory publishing.” College and Research Libraries News, 78(11), 603–606. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.78.11.603.
• Szadkowski, K. (2016). Socially necessary impact/time: Notes on the acceleration of academic labor, metrics and the transnational association of capitals. Teorie Vedy/ Theory of Science, 38(1), 53–85. Retrieved from http://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/334/361.
• Tashiro, J. S. (2009). Ethical Analysis of Publisher and Faculty Roles in Building and Using Electronic Educational Products. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2009010101.
• Taylor, S. E. (2012). Changes in doctoral education. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316973.
• Thompson, V. (2014). Graduate Programs in Publishing: Are They Worth It? The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0017.204.
• Turunen, T. A., Wong, S., Bristol, L., & Ho, S. Y. (2014). Developing “the Wings to Really Fly”: The Experiences of Four Postdoctoral Research Fellows within an Australian University Faculty of Education. Education Research International, 2014, Article number 217974, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/217974.
• Wallwork, A. (2011). English for Writing Research Papers. Boston, MA: Springer, Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7921-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7922-3.
• Weissbach, R. S., & Pflueger, R. C. (2018). Collaborating With Writing Centers on Interdisciplinary Peer Tutor Training to Improve Writing Support for Engineering Students. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2778949.
• White-Farnham, J., & Caffrey Gardner, C. (2014). Crowdsourcing the curriculum. Reference Services Review, 42(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2013-0046.
• Whitley, E. A. (2016). Challenges to ethical publishing in the digital era: A journal editor’s response to the limited mind reading skills of academic authors. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 14(1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-11-2015-0041.
• Whitworth, B., & Friedman, R. (2009). Reinventing academic publishing online. Part I: Rigor, relevance and practice. First Monday, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i8.2609.
• Whitworth, B., & Friedman, R. (2009). Reinventing academic publishing online. Part II: A socio-technical vision. First Monday, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i9.2642.
• Wilson, A. E., Pollock, J. L., Billick, I., Domingo, C., Fernandez-Figueroa, E. G., Nagy, E. S., Steury, T. D., Summers, A. (2018). Assessing Science Training Programs: Structured Undergraduate Research Programs Make a Difference. BioScience, 68(7), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy052.
• Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2012). The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies writing pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630.
• Wisker, G. (2013). Articulate – academic writing, refereeing editing and publishing our work in learning, teaching and educational development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(4), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.839337.
• Woodcock, J. (2018). Digital labour in the university: Understanding the transformations of academic work in the UK. TripleC, 16(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i1.880.

Vancouver

Perig AV. Didactic Student-Friendly Approaches to More Effective Teaching of the Fundamentals of Scientific Research in a Digital Era of Scientometrics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12):em1632. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97188

APA

Perig, A. V. (2018). Didactic Student-Friendly Approaches to More Effective Teaching of the Fundamentals of Scientific Research in a Digital Era of Scientometrics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1632. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97188

AMA

Perig AV. Didactic Student-Friendly Approaches to More Effective Teaching of the Fundamentals of Scientific Research in a Digital Era of Scientometrics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12), em1632. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97188

Chicago

Perig, Alexander V.. "Didactic Student-Friendly Approaches to More Effective Teaching of the Fundamentals of Scientific Research in a Digital Era of Scientometrics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 12 (2018): em1632. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97188

Harvard

Perig, A. V. (2018). Didactic Student-Friendly Approaches to More Effective Teaching of the Fundamentals of Scientific Research in a Digital Era of Scientometrics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1632. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97188

MLA

Perig, Alexander V. "Didactic Student-Friendly Approaches to More Effective Teaching of the Fundamentals of Scientific Research in a Digital Era of Scientometrics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 12, 2018, em1632. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97188