Early ways of relating quantities from a sixth grader

Adán Tlalmanalco; Crisólogo Dolores-Flores

doi:10.29333/ejmste/16560

Full Text (PDF)

Adán Tlalmanalco ¹ ^* , Crisólogo Dolores-Flores ¹

More Detail

¹ Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, MEXICO^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This article reports on a research project that focused on exploring the early forms of relating quantities in situations of variation exhibited by a sixth grade student. For this exploration, a case study approach was used, with a task-based Interview applied to collect data, and thematic analysis utilized to process the data. Relating quantities refers to characterizing and representing the changes of variables that vary among themselves. The early forms of relating quantities that emerged include variable identification, general recursion, correspondence, pre-coordination, and gross coordination of values. The correspondence relationship was the most frequently observed, while pre-coordination and gross coordination were the least common, suggesting that the latter could be studied in greater depth among young students.

Keywords

relating quantities
correspondence
sixth grade
covariation

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 21, Issue 7, July 2025, Article No: em2658

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16560

Publication date: 04 Jul 2025

Article Views: 59

Article Downloads: 33

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2004). Elementary grades students’ capacity for functional thinking. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED489698
Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39-87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 57-71), American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Newman-Owens, A., & Murphy Gardiner, A. (2015). Children’s use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), 34-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981939
Cantoral, U. R. (2019). Paths of knowledge. Thought and variational language. Gedisa.
Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352-378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
Castillo-Garsow, C. (2012). Continuous quantitative reasoning. Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling: A driver for STEM integrated education and teaching in context, 2, 55-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284959678_Continuous_quantitative_reasoning
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 135-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273661
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66-86. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.1.0066
Ellis, A., Ozgur, Z., & Doğan, M. F. (2023). A conceptual analysis of early function through quantitative reasoning. In Quantitative Reasoning in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 169-197). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14553-7_7
Ferrari-Escolá, M., Martinez-Sierra, G., & Méndez-Guevara, M. E. M. (2016). Multiply by adding: Development of logarithmic-exponential covariational reasoning in high school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 92-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.03.003
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 178-183). SAGE.
Goldin, G. A. (2000). Scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh, (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517-545). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602725
Jacobson, E. (2014). Using covariation reasoning to support mathematical modeling. The Mathematics Teacher, 107(7), 515-519. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.7.0515
Johnson, H. L. (2015). Secondary students’ quantification of ratio and rate: A framework for reasoning about change in covarying quantities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981946
Johnson, H. L. (2023). An intellectual need for relationships: Engendering students’ quantitative and covariational reasoning. In G. Karagöz Akar, İ. Ö. Zembat, S. Arslan, & P. W. Thompson (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning in mathematics and science education (pp. 17-34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14553-7_2
Johnson, H. L., McClintock, E., & Hornbein, P. (2017). Ferris wheels and filling bottles: A case of a student’s transfer of covariational reasoning across tasks with different backgrounds and features. ZDM, 49, 851-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0866-4
Kertil, M., Erbas, A. K., & Cetinkaya, B. (2019). Developing prospective teachers’ covariational reasoning through a model development sequence. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(3), 207-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1576001
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001
López González, W. O. (2013). El estudio de casos: Una vertiente para la investigación educativa [Case studies: A perspective for educational research]. Educere, 17(56),139-144.
Maher, C. A., & Sigley, R. (2020). Task-based interviews in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 821-824). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_147
Moss, J., & McNab, S. L. (2011). An approach to geometric and numeric patterning that fosters second grade students’ reasoning and generalizing about functions and co-variation. In J. Cai, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 277-301). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_16
Panorkou, N., & Maloney, A. P. (2016). Early algebra: Expressing covariation and correspondence. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(2), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.23.2.0090
Paoletti, T., & Moore, K. C. (2017). The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003
Pinto, E., Canadas, M. C., Moreno, A., & Castro, E. (2016). Functional relationships evidenced by third-year primary school students and the representation systems they use. Research in Mathematics Education XX, 417-426.
Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2020). Young students’ functional thinking modes: The relation between recursive patterning, covariational thinking, and correspondence relations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(5), 631-674. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0164
Şen Zeytun, A., Çetinkaya, B., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ covariational reasoning levels and predictions about students’ covariational reasoning abilities. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(3), 1601-1612.
SEP. (2022). Plan de estudios de la educación básica 2022 [Basic Education Curriculum 2022]. GOB.MX. https://educacionbasica.sep.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Plan-de-Estudio-ISBN-ELECTRONICO.pdf
Sfard, A. (2012). Symbolizing mathematical reality into being–Or how mathematical discourse and mathematical objects create each other. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms (pp. 37-98). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605351
Smith, E. (2017). 5 representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133-160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-6
Stephens, A. C., Fonger, N., Strachota, S., Isler, I., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., & Murphy Gardiner, A. (2017). A learning progression for elementary students’ functional thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19(3), 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2017.1328636
Tanışlı, D. (2011). Functional thinking ways in relation to linear function tables of elementary school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(3), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.08.001
Thompson, P. W., y Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421-456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wilkie, K. J. (2020). Investigating students’ attention to covariation features of their constructed graphs in a figural pattern generalization context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09955-6
Yin, R. K. (2006). Case study methods. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111-122). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

How to cite this article

APA

Tlalmanalco, A., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2025). Early ways of relating quantities from a sixth grader. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(7), em2658. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16560

Vancouver

Tlalmanalco A, Dolores-Flores C. Early ways of relating quantities from a sixth grader. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(7):em2658. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16560

AMA

Tlalmanalco A, Dolores-Flores C. Early ways of relating quantities from a sixth grader. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(7), em2658. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16560

Chicago

Tlalmanalco, Adán, and Crisólogo Dolores-Flores. "Early ways of relating quantities from a sixth grader". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 7 (2025): em2658. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16560

Harvard

Tlalmanalco, A., and Dolores-Flores, C. (2025). Early ways of relating quantities from a sixth grader. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(7), em2658. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16560

MLA

Tlalmanalco, Adán et al. "Early ways of relating quantities from a sixth grader". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 7, 2025, em2658. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16560