• Ahmad, A., Tarmizi, R. A., & Nawawi, M. (2010). Visual representations in mathematical word problem solving among form four students in Malacca. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 356-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.050.
• Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9.
• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.
• Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp.89-195). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3.
• Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1245.
• Ayres, P. (2013). Can the isolated-elements strategy be improved by targeting points of high cognitive load for additional practice? Learning and Instruction, 23, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.002.
• Bernardo, A. B. T. (1999). Overcoming obstacles to understanding and solving word problems in mathematics. Educational Psychology, 19(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341990190203.
• Brenner, M. E., Mayer, R. E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Durán, R., Reed, B. S., & Webb, D. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 663-689. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034004663.
• Chen, M. J., Lee, C. Y., Lei, K. H., Tso, T. Y., & Lin S. L. (2017). Multimedia instruction presented by integrated context to enhance understanding of compass-and-straightedge construction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3735-3752. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00756a.
• Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504794.
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf.
• Crooks, S. M., Cheon, J., Inan, F., Ari, F., & Flores, R. (2012). Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1063-1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.010.
• Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 405-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90011-4.
• de Bock, D., van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Students’ understanding of proportional, inverse proportional, and affine functions: Two studies of the role of external representations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(Suppl 1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9475-z.
• de Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & de Win, L. (1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children’s problem representations and solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 460-470. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.77.4.460.
• de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010). Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education, 55, 681-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.027.
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Education Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z.
• Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671.
• Goldstein, E. B. (2014). Sensation and perception (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Technology Psychology, 91(4), 684-689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684.
• Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2004). Does animation attract online users’ attention? The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 60-86. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0017.
• Jamet, E., Gavota, M., & Quaireau, C. (2008). Attention guiding in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 18, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.011.
• Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., Haria, P., Leh, J., Adams, A., & Kaduvettoor, A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.115.
• Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Rodriguez, M., Lindell, M., & Someki, F. (2011). Improving students’ proportional thinking using schema-based instruction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 731-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.002.
• Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2481-2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a.
• Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Just-in-time information presentation: Improving learning a troubleshooting skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.002.
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Science, 13(2), 129-164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1.
• Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. J. (2015). Effects of Polya questioning instruction for geometry reasoning in junior high school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1547-1561. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1419a.
• Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. J. (2016). Developing a questionnaire on technology-integrated mathematics instruction: A case study of the AMA training course in Xinjiang and Taiwan. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1287-1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12339.
• Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Lewis, A. B. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.521.
• Litvinova, E. (2014). Adding another row to the time-distance-speed diagram. Mathematics Teaching, 240, 47-50.
• Llinares, S., & Roig, A. I. (2006). Secondary school students’ construction and use of mathematical models in solving word problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 505-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9055-6.
• Luzón, J. M., & Letón, E. (2015). Use of animated text to improve the learning of basic mathematics. Computers & Education, 88, 119-128.
• Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.88.1.49.
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678.003.
• Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14, 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500527676.
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.) (2013). TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics, and financial literacy. Paris, France: Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en.
• Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43(4), 307-318. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208800.
• Pavlin-Bernadrić, N., Vlahović-Štetić, V., & Arambašić, L. (2008). Children’s solving of mathematical word problems: The contribution of working memory. Review of Psychology, 15(1-2), 35-43.
• Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Hayward, E. O, (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(1), 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9011-x.
• Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42-46.
• Pretorius, A. J. (2008). Visualization of state transition graphs. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
• Riley, M. S, Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153-196). New York, NY: Academic Press.
• Sepeng, P., & Sigola, S. (2013). Making sense of errors made by learners in mathematical word problem solving. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 325-333. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n13p325.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_18.
• Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(2), 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.2.176.
• Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255(5), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1186-114B.
• Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5.
• Underwood, J., & Underwood, G. (1987). Data organisation and retrieval by children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 57(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1987.tb00860.x.
• Ware, C. (2013). Information visualization: Perception for design (3rd ed.). Waltham, MA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381464-7.00006-5.
• Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search: A review. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-77). London, UK: University College London Press.
• Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.121.

APA

Lee, C.-Y., Lei, K. H., Chen, M.-J., Tso, T.-Y., & Chen, I.-P. (2018). Enhancing Understanding through the Use of Structured Representations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85424

Vancouver

Lee CY, Lei KH, Chen MJ, Tso TY, Chen IP. Enhancing Understanding through the Use of Structured Representations. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(5):1875-86. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85424

AMA

Lee CY, Lei KH, Chen MJ, Tso TY, Chen IP. Enhancing Understanding through the Use of Structured Representations. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(5), 1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85424

Chicago

Lee, Chun-Yi, Kin Hang Lei, Ming-Jang Chen, Tai-Yih Tso, and I-Ping Chen. "Enhancing Understanding through the Use of Structured Representations". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 5 (2018): 1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85424

Harvard

Lee, C.-Y., Lei, K. H., Chen, M.-J., Tso, T.-Y., and Chen, I.-P. (2018). Enhancing Understanding through the Use of Structured Representations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), pp. 1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85424

MLA

Lee, Chun-Yi et al. "Enhancing Understanding through the Use of Structured Representations". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85424