• Adomßent, M., Fischer, D., Godemann, J., Herzig, C., Otte, I., Rieckmann, M., & Timm, J. (2014). Emerging Areas in Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development Management Education. Sustainable Consumption and Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe, 62(1), 1–7.
• Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Education, Technology and Society, 15(4), 380–389.
• Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416 –430.
• Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 26, 321–331.
• Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
• Berge, Z. L. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: can policy changes fix it? Online Journal of Distance education Administration, 1(2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/Berge12.html.
• Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S. (1999). Barriers to online teaching in elementary, secondary, and teacher education. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 27(2), 59–72.
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.
• Bull, D. D. (2012). From ripple to tsunami: The possible impact of MOOCs on higher education. DEQuarterly, 2012(12), 10–11.
• Bullen, M., Morgan, T., Belfer, K., & Qayyum, A. (2009). The next generation in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. International Journal of Excellence in E-Learning, 2(1), 1–13.
• Casey, J. (2012). Taking Care of Business? The political economy of MOOCs and Open Education. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/ao2agyc.
• Chamberlin, L., & Parish, T. (2011). MOOCs: Massive open online courses or massive and often obtuse courses? eLearn Magazine, August 2011. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=2016017.
• Chan, Y. K., Hsieh, M. Y., Lee, C. F., Huang, C. C., & Ho, L. C. (2017). Inquiring the most critical teacher’s technology education competences and in the highest efficient technology education learning organization. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(6), 2645–2664. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01245a.
• Coursera (2013). Five courses receive college credit recommendations. Retrieved from http://blog.coursera.org/post/42486198362/five-courses-receive-college-credit-recommendations.
• DeWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M. S., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez, O. C. (2011). Using m-Learning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 94–115. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1046/2043.
• Dollard, M., Wineield, H., Wineield, A., & de Jong, P. (2000) Psychosocial job strain and productivity in human service workers: a test of the demand, control, support model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 501–510.
• Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development – Justification, model, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 149–158.
• Evers, W. J. G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002) Burnout and self-efficacy: a study on teachers’ beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 227–243.
• Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Gliniecka, M. (2016). How do People Construct Communication about their Creative Process? Study on Future Creative Professionals. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1199-1204. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1506a.
• Grindsted, T. S. (2011). Sustainable universities – from declarations on sustainability in higher education to national law. Environmental Economics, 2(2), 29–36.
• Grindsted, T. S., & Holm, T. (2012). Thematic development of declarations on Sustainability in Higher Education. Environmental Economics, 3(1), 32–40.
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tathan, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a.
• Hsieh, M. Y. (2012). The Innovative Grey-Clustering Macroeconomic Assessment Model to Detect the Fluctuation in the Ten Economies. Journal of Grey System, 24(1), 67–80.
• Hsieh, M. Y. (2014). The Application of the SCT and the ANP Model to Refine the Most Critical ICT Determinants in Minimizing the Digital Divide. Mathematical Problem Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/309675.
• Hsieh, M. Y. (2016a). The most potential principles of social media. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 51(2016), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.12.013.
• Hsieh, M. Y. (2016b). Online learning era: exploring the most decisive determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese higher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a.
• Hsieh, M. Y. & Chan, Y. K. (2016). Is online learning able to effectively decrease tuition and miscellaneous fees debt of higher education in Taiwan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1313–1326. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1515a.
• Hsieh, M. Y. (2017). Online learning era: exploring the most decisive determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese higher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(7), 3189-3208. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00712a.
• Hyman, P. (2012). In the year of disruptive education. Communications of the ACM, 55(12), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380656.2380664.
• Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: Agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 26, 344–356.
• Karatzoglou, B. (2013). An in-depth literature review of the evolving roles and contributions of universities to Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 44–53.
• Kennedy, G., Dalgarnot, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K., Bishop, A., Chang, R. & Churchward, R. (2007). The next generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007.
• Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarnot, B. & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 26, 332–343.
• Kirby, J. R., Ball, A., Geier, B. K., Parrila, R., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2011). The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01439.x.
• Kirkham, G. (2004). The role of the subject leader. London: Optimus.
• Kirkwood, K. (2010). The wisdom of the clouds: Distributed learning, MOOCs, edupunks, and the challenge to formal education. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Open Source and Open Content (WOSOC) 2010, 96–103. Gunadarma University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
• Knight, P. (2000). The value of a programme-wide approach to assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 237–251.
• Lambrechts, W., Mulà, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Gaeremynck, V. (2013). The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: an analysis of bachelor programs in management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 65–73.
• Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R. (2012). Information communication technologies and distance education in Sri Lanka: A case study of two universities (PhD Thesis). University of Reading, Reading.
• Lunn, P., & Bishop, A. (2002). Subject leader and class teacher: Exploring the conflict of a dual role in a primary school. Research in Education, 68, 64–76.
• Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, 266–275. University of Lancaster, Lancaster.
• Mak, S., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. In Networked Learning Conference, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, 275–285.
• Martin, F. G. (2012). Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2240236.2240246.
• Masters, K. (2011). A brief guide to understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education, 1(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5580/1f21.
• McArdle, J. J. (1990). Principles versus principals of structural factor analyses. Multivariate Behavior Research, 25(1), 81–87.
• Mehaffy, G. L. (2012). Challenge and change. Education Review, 47(5), 25–41.
• Mehlenbacher, B. (2012). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Educational innovation or threat to higher education? Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Source and Design of Communication, 1–99. Lisboa, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.1145/2316936.2316953.
• Moore, M. (1994). Administrative barriers to adoption of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526862.
• Palfrey, J., Gasser, U., Simun, M., & Barnes, R.F. (2009). Youth, creativity and copyright in the digital age. International Journal of Learning & Media, 1(2), 79–97.
• Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the Natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8–13.
• Rickes, P. C. (2009). Make way for the millenials!: How today’s students are shaping higher education spaces. Planning for Higher Education, 37(2), 7–17.
• Rieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 44(2), 127–135.
• Robbins, J. (2013). The ethics of MOOCs. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/sounding-board/ethics-moocs.
• Shephard, K., Smith, N., Deaker, L., Harraway, J., Broughton‐Ansin, F., & Mann, S. (2011). Comparing different measures of affective attributes relating to sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 329–340.
• Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325–344.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-21.
• Snock, S. C., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1989). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 148–154.
• Stephens, J., & Graham, A. C. (2010). Toward an empirical research agenda for sustainability in higher education: exploring the transition management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 611–618.
• Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2000). The development and psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional measurement instrument of professional expertise. High Ability Studies, 11, 9–39.
• Vink, M. P., & Vliet, O. V. (2009). Not quite crisp, not yet fuzzy? Assessing the potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA. Field Methods, 21(3), 265–289.
• Vink, M. P., & Vliet, O. V. (2013). Potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA: Response to Them. Field Methods 25(2), 208–213.
• Wals, A. (2010). Mirroring, Gestalt switching and transformative social learning Stepping stones for developing sustainability competence. International Journal of Sustainable In Higher Education, 11(4), 380–90.
• Widamam, K. F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavior Research, 28(3), 263–311.
• Wilson, V., & Pirrie, A. (1999) Developing professional competence: lessons from the emergency room. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 211–224.
• Yorio, P., & Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9–27.

APA

Hsieh, M.-Y. (2018). Exploring the Most Decisive Online Education Determinants as Impacted by Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1945-1962. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83608

Vancouver

Hsieh MY. Exploring the Most Decisive Online Education Determinants as Impacted by Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(5):1945-62. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83608

AMA

Hsieh MY. Exploring the Most Decisive Online Education Determinants as Impacted by Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(5), 1945-1962. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83608

Chicago

Hsieh, Ming-Yuan. "Exploring the Most Decisive Online Education Determinants as Impacted by Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 5 (2018): 1945-1962. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83608

Harvard

Hsieh, M.-Y. (2018). Exploring the Most Decisive Online Education Determinants as Impacted by Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), pp. 1945-1962. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83608

MLA

Hsieh, Ming-Yuan "Exploring the Most Decisive Online Education Determinants as Impacted by Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1945-1962. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83608