• Anoshkin, A. P. (1997). Pedagogical design of teaching systems and technologies. Omsk: Omsk State Pedagogical University.
• Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the Development of Pre-Service Teachers’ Problem-Solving Strategies via Problem-Solving Mathematics Classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129
• Bayanova, L. F., & Minyaev, O. G. (2019). Cultural Congruence Test for Russian Adolescents. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 12(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0312
• Baykova, L. A., Grebenkina, L. K., Eremkina, O. V., Zhokina, N. A., Martishina, N. V., & Tsirulnikova, O. F. (2000). Pedagogical excellence and pedagogical technology. Moscow: Russian Pedagogical Society.
• Blinnikova, I. V., Rabeson, M. D., & Izmalkova, A. I. (2019). Eye Movements and Word Recognition during Visual Semantic Search: Differences between Expert and Novice Language Learners. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 12(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0110
• Dalinger, V. A. (2015). Case study in training a math teacher. International Journal of Experiential Education, 3(3), 427-430.
• Dietrich, J. (1981). Design and construction: A systematic approach. Moscow: Mir Publ.
• Golovanova, I. I., Asafova, E. V., & Telegina, N. V. (2014). Interactive learning practices: textbook of methods. Kazan: Kazansky universitet Publ.
• Gordeeva, T. O., Sychev, O. A., Pshenichnuk, D. V., & Sidneva, A. N. (2018). Academic Motivation of Elementary School Children in Two Educational Approaches — Innovative and Traditional. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 11(4), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2018.0402
• Gronlund, N. (1982). Design achievement tests. London: Prentice Hall.
• Guzeev, V. V. (1998). Development of educational technology. Moscow: Pedagogy.
• Kirikova, Z. Z. (2000). Pedagogical Technology: Theoretical Aspects. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of Ural state professional and pedagogical university.
• Kiyomova, K. A. (2017). Case study in practical training as an accelerator of the pedagogical process. Young Scientist, 21, 423-424.
• Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education. Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, 1, 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.012
• Konnova, L., Lipagina, L., Postovalova, G., Rylov, A., & Stepanyan, I. (2019). Designing adaptive online mathematics course based on individualization learning. Education Sciences, 9(3), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030182
• Lebedeva, L. I. & Ivanova, E. V. (2002). Project based learning in effective training. School Technologies, 5, 116-120.
• Logacheva, A. G., & Golovanova, I. I. (2019). Effectiveness of a case study method in formation of professional competencies of undergraduates of a technical university. Problems of modern teacher education, (63-4), 148-151.
• Mukhametshin, R. Z., Kryukova, N. I., Beloborodova, A. V., Grinenko, A. V., & Popova, O. V. (2019), Implementation of efficient energy policy in Russia: Energy consumption monitoring and problem analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(4), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7967
• Naji, K. K., Ebead, U., Al-Ali, A. K., & Du, X. (2020). Comparing Models of Problem and Project-Based Learning (PBL) Courses and Student Engagement in Civil Engineering in Qatar. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(8), em1867. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8291
• Ogot, M., & Okudan, G. E. (2007). Systematic creativity methods in engineering education: a learning styles perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 566-576.
• Orekhovskaya, N. A., Chistyakov, A. A., Kryukova, N. I., Krokhina, J. A., Ospennikov, Y. V., & Makarova, E. V. (2019). Orthodoxy and modernity their contact facets in Russian society. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(2), 67-77.
• Pokushalova, L. V. (2011). Case study method as a modern technology for professionally oriented student education. Young Scientist, (5-2), 155-157.
• Potapova, S. V., Danilova, I. Y., Prasolov, V. I., Makarova, E. V., & Kryukova, N. I. (2018). Mythological foundations of ontology. XLinguae, 11(2), 672-685. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.53
• Rasslan, S., Arisha Haj Ihia, H., Haj-Yahia, S., & Rasslan-Sharif, A. (2020). The Discovery Approach Strategy in Solving Hard Mathematics Problems: A Case Study. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 1(1), ep20004. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/8449
• Ratnasari, R., & Safarini TLS, D. (2020). Problem-Solving Strategies Used by Eight Grade Students. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 1(2), ep20008. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/8497
• Salnikova, M. G. (2016). Features of the use of a case study method in teaching mathematics to students of a technical university. Modern educational technologies in the world educational space, 4, 147-152.
• Sanina, Y. I., Artyukhina, M. S., Dendeberya, N. G., Savadova, A. A., & Nasikan, I. V. (2019). The use of internet technologies in teaching bachelors-economists mathematics as a factor of students’ professional growth. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 3877-3880. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3078.078219
• Siagian, M. V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Oriented on Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Metacognition Ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5717
• Smolyaninova, O. G. (2000). Didactic possibilities of the case study method in teaching students. Humanitarian Bulletin, 3, 32-35.
• Telegina, N. V., Drovosekov, S. E., Vasbieva, D. G., & Zakharova, V. L. (2019). The use of project activity in teaching mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), 1738. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108439
• Testov, V. A. (2018). Integration of discreteness and continuity in forming mathematical world view among students. Integration of Education, 22(3), 480-492. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.092.022.201803.480-492
• Ulandari, L., Amry, Z., & Saragih, S. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Based on Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375-383. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5721
• Veraksa, A. N., Bukhalenkova, D. A., & Kovyazina, M. S. (2018). Language Proficiency in Preschool Children with Different Levels of Executive Function. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 11(4), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2018.0408
• Verbitsky, A. A. (1991). Active Learning in Higher Education: A Contextual Approach. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ.
• Verbitsky, A. A., & Borisova, N. V. (1990). Methodical recommendations for conducting business games. Problems of educational psychology and psychology of education, 4, 73-84.
• Vilensky, M. Ya., Obraztsov, P. I., & Uman, A. (2005). Technologies of professional education in higher education. Moscow: Yurait.
• Yadav, A., Shaver, G. M., & Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01042.x
• Yang, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, B., Wang, L., & Kong, X. (2019). Case design of linear algebra hybrid teaching model under problem-based learning International. Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(9), 618-622. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.9.1277
• Zabelina, E. V., & Fortunato, V. J. (2019). Development of a Russian Version of the MindTime Profile Inventory: The Measurement of Past, Present, and Future Thinking in a Russian Sample. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 12(2), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0211

APA

Gorskaya, T. Y., Golovanova, I. I., Khammatova, R. S., Polichka, A. E., & Romanchenko, L. N. (2020). Features of a Project-Case Technology in Teaching Students Further Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), em1900. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8562

Vancouver

Gorskaya TY, Golovanova II, Khammatova RS, Polichka AE, Romanchenko LN. Features of a Project-Case Technology in Teaching Students Further Mathematics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(11):em1900. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8562

AMA

Gorskaya TY, Golovanova II, Khammatova RS, Polichka AE, Romanchenko LN. Features of a Project-Case Technology in Teaching Students Further Mathematics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(11), em1900. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8562

Chicago

Gorskaya, Tatiana Yu., Inna I. Golovanova, Rina S. Khammatova, Anatolii E. Polichka, and Leonid N. Romanchenko. "Features of a Project-Case Technology in Teaching Students Further Mathematics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 11 (2020): em1900. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8562

Harvard

Gorskaya, T. Y., Golovanova, I. I., Khammatova, R. S., Polichka, A. E., and Romanchenko, L. N. (2020). Features of a Project-Case Technology in Teaching Students Further Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), em1900. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8562

MLA

Gorskaya, Tatiana Yu. et al. "Features of a Project-Case Technology in Teaching Students Further Mathematics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 11, 2020, em1900. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8562