• Acar, Ö., Türkmen, L. & Bilgin, A. (2015). Examination of Gender Differences on Cognitive and Motivational Factors that Influence 8thGraders’ Science Achievement in Turkey, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 1027-1040
• Açıkgöz, K. U. (2002). Active Learning İzmir: World of Education Press.
• Baepler, P., Walker, J.D. & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms, Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
• Baran, M. & Maskan, A.K. (2010). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Physics Teachers Electrostatic Achievements, Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4).
• Baş, S. (2010). Effects of Multiple Intelligences Instruction Strategy on Students’ Achievement Levels and Attitudes Towards English Lesson. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 5, 167-180.
• Bates, S. & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study. Proceedings of the Higher Education Academy STEM Learning and Teaching Conference. DOI: 10.11120/stem.hea.2012.071.
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flip Your Classroom Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Get Abstract Compressed Knowledge, 1–5.
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
• Bishop, J. L. & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA.
• Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2013). Flipping Your Classroom in One “Take.” The Science Teacher, 80(3), 8.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Data analysis handbook for social sciences (7th Edition). Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
• Cano, E.M., Ruiz, J. G. & Garcia, I.A. (2013). Integrating a Learning Constructionist Environment and the Instructional Design Approach into the Definition of a Basic Course for Embedded Systems Design. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(1), 36-53.
• Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27.
• Covill, A. E. (2011). College Students’ Perceptions of the Traditional Lecture Method. College Student Journal, 45(1), 92–101.
• Demirci, N. (2015). Prospective High School Physics Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching Practices: From Traditionalist to Constructivist. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(3), 693-711.
• Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science (New York, N.Y.), 332(6031), 862–864. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783
• Enfield, J. (2013). Flipped Classroom Model of Instruction on Undergraduate Multimedia Students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6).
• Ferreri, S. & O’Connor, SK. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1), 13, DOI: 10.5688/ajpe77113
• Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63–71. Retrieved from http://www.theibfr.com/ARCHIVE/BEA-V6N1-2014- revised.pdf#page=35
• Formica, S.P., Easley, J.L. & Spraker, M.C., (2010). Transforming common-sense beliefs into Newtonian thinking through just-in- time teaching, Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 1–7.
• Frydenberg, M. (2012). Flipping Excel. 2012 Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference, 1-1, New Orleans: EDSIG.
• Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out : Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12–17.
• Glynn, M.S., Taasoobshirazi, G. & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct Validation with Nonscience Majors. Journal of Researchin Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146.
• Goodwin, B. & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on Flipped Classrooms is Still Coming In. Educational Leadeship, 70(6), 78-80.
• Gülten, D.Ç.,& Soytürk, İ. (2013).The Relation Between 6th Grade Elementary School Students ’ Self -Efficacy Beliefs and Academic Achievement in Geometry. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 25, 55-70.
• Hardre, P. (2005). Instructional design as a professional development tool-of-choice for graduate teaching assistants.Innovative Higher Education, 30(3), 163-175.
• Hung, H. (2014). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning, (October), 37–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
• İlhan, N., Yıldırım, A. & Yılmaz, S.S. (2012).Chemistry Motivation Questionnaire: The Study of Validity and Reliability.Mustafa Kemal UniversityJournal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(18), 297-310.
• Kapoun, P. & Milková, A. (2014). MLearning–efficient support of natural science education. Global Journal of Information Technology, 4(2), 114-119.
• Kay, R. & Kletskin, I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education. Computers & Education, 59(2), 619-627.
• Keller, J. M. (1987). IMMS: Instructional materials motivation survey. Tallahassee, Florida: Florida State University.
• Kellinger, J.J. (2012). The flipside: Concerns about the “New literacies” paths educators might take. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 524-536.
• Kenna, D.C. (2014). A study of the effect the flipped classroom model on student self-efficacy. Master'sThesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota.
• Kocakaya, S., & Gönen, S. (2010). Analysis of Turkish high-school physics-examination questions according to Bloom’s taxonomy. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1039/b2rp90034c
• Kong, S.C., (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy, Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
• Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2013). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317–324. http://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582
• Marcey, D. & Brint, M. (2011). Transforming an Undergraduate Introductory Biology Course Through Cinematic Lectures and Inverted Classes: A Preliminary Assessment of The Clic Model Of The Flipped Classroom. California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Marlowe, C. A. (2012). The effect of the flipped classroom on student achievement and stres (Unpublished master’s thesis). Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
• McMillan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry (7th Edition). New York: Pearson Publishing.
• Nolan, M. A. & Washington, S. S. (2013). Flipped out: Successful strategies for improving student engagement. Paper presented at Virginia Tech’s Conference on HigherEducation Pedagogy, Blacksburg, VA.
• Ozen, Y., Gulacti, F. & Kandemir, M. (2006).The Problem of Validity and Reability in Educational Research.Erzincan University Journal of Education, 8(1), 69-89.
• Papadopoulos, C. & Roman, A. S. (2010). Implementing an inverted classroom in engineering statistics: initial results. Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC.
• Roach, T. (2014).Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74-84,
• Schaal, S. (2010).Enriching traditional biology lectures– digital concept maps and their influence on achievement and motivation. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(1), 42-54.
• Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S.C. & Wageman, J. (2014).Effects of the Flipped Classroom Model on Student Performance for Advanced Placement High School Chemistry Students.Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334-1339.
• Schunk, H. D. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Ohio: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall.
• Seaman, G. & Gaines, N. (2013). Leveraging digital learning systems to flip classroom instruction. Journal of Modern Teacher Quarterly, 1, 25-27.
• Sekercioglu, A.G. (2011).The effect of peer instruction method on prospective teachers' conceptual understanding and their attitude toward electrostatics. Doctoral Thesis, Balıkesir University, Institute of Science, Balıkesir.
• Sencan, H. (2005). Reliability and validity in the social and behavioral measurement. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Serway, R. A., & Kirkpatrick, L. D. (1988). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics. The Physics Teacher, 26(4), 254. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.2342517
• Snowden, K.E. (2012). Teacher Perceptions of The Flipped Classroom: Using Video Lectures Online to Replace Traditional In-Class Lectures. Master's Thesis, University of North Texas.
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
• Tekbıyık, A.& Akdeniz, A.R. (2010). An Investigation on the Comparison of Context Based and Traditional Physics Problems. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 123-140.
• Tekerek, M., Tekerek, A. & Ercan, O. (2012). Assessment of physics teachers' attitudes towards internet use in terms of some variables. World Journal on Educational Technology,4(1), 43-55.
• Tezer M. & Aşıksoy, G. (2015). Engineering students’ self-efficiacy related to physics learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(3) 311-326.
• Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.
• Wetterlund, K. (2008). Flipping the field trip: Bringing the art museum to the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 47,110–117.
• Winter, J. B. (2013). The effect of the flipped classroom model on achievement in an introductory college physics course. Master's Thesis, Mississippi State University.
• Yam, H. (2005). What is contextual learning and teaching in physics? Retrieved April 10, 2015 from Contextual Physics in Ocean Park. http://www.phy.cuhk.edu.hk/contextual/approach/tem/brief_e.html
• Yeung, K. & O’Malley, P.J. (2014). Making ‘The Flip’ Work: Barriers to and Implementation Strategies for Introducing Flipped Teaching Methods into Traditional Higher Education Courses. The Higher Education Academy, 10(1).

APA

Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a

Vancouver

Aşıksoy G, Özdamlı F. Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(6):1589-603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a

AMA

Aşıksoy G, Özdamlı F. Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(6), 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a

Chicago

Aşıksoy, Gülsüm, and Fezile Özdamlı. "Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 6 (2016): 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a

Harvard

Aşıksoy, G., and Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), pp. 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a

MLA

Aşıksoy, Gülsüm et al. "Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 6, 2016, pp. 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a