Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Amador, J. M., Estapa, A., Kosko, K., & Weston, T. (2021). Prospective teachers’ noticing and mathematical decisions to respond: Using technology to approximate practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1656828
• Barnes, T. (2005). The Q-matrix method: Mining student response data for knowledge. In Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence 2005 Educational data mining Workshop (pp. 1-8). AAAI Press.
• Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education.
• Blömeke, S., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Suhl, U. (2016). The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.003
• Blonder, R., Feldman-Maggor, Y., & Rap, S. (2024). Are they ready to teach? Generative AI as a means to uncover pre-service science teachers’ PCK and enhance their preparation program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34, 1301-1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10180-2
• Bywater, J. P., Chiu, J. L., Hong, J., & Sankaranarayanan, V. (2019). The teacher responding tool: Scaffolding the teacher practice of responding to student ideas in mathematics classrooms. Computers & Education, 139, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.004
• Campos, F. C., Ahn, J., DiGiacomo, D. K., Nguyen, H., & Hays, M. (2021). Making sense of sensemaking: Understanding how K-12 teachers and coaches react to visual analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(3), Article 60. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7113
• Chan, K. K. H., Xu, L., Cooper, R., Berry, A., & van Driel, J. H. (2021). Teacher noticing in science education: Do you see what I see? Studies in Science Education, 57(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755803
• Chen, Z., & Wan, T. (2025). Grading explanations of problem-solving process and generating feedback using large language models at human-level accuracy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21, Article 010126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010126
• Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
• Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
• Choy, B. H., & Dindyal, J. (2022). Teacher noticing, mathematics. In Encyclopedia of teacher education (pp. 1860-1864). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8679-5_241
• Cojean, S., Brun, L., Amadieu, F., & Dessus, P. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes towards AI: What is the difference with non-AI technologies? In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
• Dickler, R. (2021). An intelligent tutoring system and teacher dashboard to support students on mathematics in science inquiry [PhD thesis, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey].
• Din, B., Nazaretsky, T., Feldman-Maggor, Y., & Alexandron, G. (2023). Automated identification and validation of the optimal number of knowledge profiles in student response data. In Proceedings of the 16^th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 458-465). https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/rvmwq
• Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, Article 010130. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.010130
• Evans, M., Teasdale, R. M., Gannon-Slater, N., Londe, P. G. L., Crenshaw, H. L., Greene, J. C., & Schwandt, T. A. (2019). How did that happen? Teachers’ explanations for low test scores. Teachers College Record, 121(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100202
• Feldman-Maggor, Y., Nazaretsky, T., & Alexandron, G. (2024). Explainable AI for unsupervised machine learning: A proposed scheme applied to a case study with science teachers. In Proceedings of the 16^th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (vol. 1, pp. 436–444). https://doi.org/10.5220/0012687000003693
• Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17117
• Henderson, C., Yerushalmi, E., Kuo, V. H., Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2007). Physics faculty beliefs and values about the teaching and learning of problem solving. II. Procedures for measurement and analysis. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 3, Article 020110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020110
• Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
• Karsenty, R., Pöhler, B., Schwarts, G., Prediger, S., & Arcavi, A. (2023). Processes of decision-making by mathematics PD facilitators: The role of resources, orientations, goals, and identities. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09518-z
• Khamari, J., & Patel, A. K. (2024). Individualized learning: Customized tutoring with artificial intelligence (AI) adaptability. In 2024: Learning beyond textbooks: ChatGPT and the future of education (pp. 144-157). Redshine Archives.
• Kibret, T. G. (2016). Lesson planning and students’ performance feedback data use [PhD thesis, Universität Koblenz-Landau].
• Klebanov, B. B., & Madnani, N. (2020). Automated evaluation of writing–50 years and counting. In Proceedings of the 58^th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 7796-7810). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.697
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101-111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
• Kosko, K. W., Zolfaghari, M., & Heisler, J. L. (2022). Professional noticing as student-centered: Pre-service teachers’ attending to students’ mathematics in 360 video. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(9), Article em2145. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12267
• Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 707-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5
• Lee, M. Y. (2018). Further investigation into the quality of teachers’ noticing expertise: A proposed framework for evaluating teachers’ models of students’ mathematical thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(11), Article em1570. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92019
• Lee, S., Chen, Z., Pritchard, D., Kimn, A., & Paul, A. (2017). Factor analysis reveals student thinking using the mechanics reasoning inventory. Proceedings of the 4^th ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 197-200). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3053984
• Levy, S., Eylon, B. S., Bagno, E., & Yerushalmi, E. (2026). It takes a professional learning community to grow as a physics teacher. Physics Education, 61, Article 015004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae1432
• Li, J., & Singh, C. (2016). Developing and validating a conceptual survey to assess introductory physics students’ understanding of magnetism. European Journal of Physics, 38(2), Article 025702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/38/2/025702
• Li, Y., & Wu, H. (2012). A clustering method based on K-means algorithm. Physics Procedia, 25, 1104-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.206
• Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795-813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9
• Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., & Lockyer, L. (2020). Digital learning environments, the science of learning, and the relationship between the teacher and the learner. In A. Carrol, R. Cunnington, & A. Nugent (Eds.), Learning under the lens (pp. 154-168). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027833-11
• Luft, J. A., Huang, Y., Singh, H., Ozen-Tasdemir, H., DeLuca, J., Watson, S., Ayano, E., & Whitworth, B. A. (2024). Exploring the noticing of science teachers: What teachers’ notice and using video to capture teacher knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 124(3), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12623
• Luna, M. J., Selmer, S. J., & Rye, J. A. (2018). Teachers’ noticing of students’ thinking in science through classroom artifacts: In what ways are science and engineering practices evident? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(2), 148-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2018.1427418
• Luo, X. (2020). Supporting K-12 Teachers’ decision making through interactive visualizations: A case study to improve the usability of a real-time analytic dashboard [PhD thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology].
• Machalow, R., Remillard, J.T., Van Steenbrugge, H., & Kim, OK. (2020). How curriculum materials support teachers’ noticing of student thinking. In J. T. Remillard, & O. K. Kim, (Eds.), Elementary mathematics curriculum materials. Research in mathematics education (pp. 195-226). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38588-0_7
• Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1), S12-S23. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1371296
• Matcha, W., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2019). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(2), 226-245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2019.2916802
• Mavroudi, A., Giannakos, M., & Krogstie, J. (2018). Supporting adaptive learning pathways through the use of learning analytics: Developments, challenges and future opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1292531
• McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
• Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2017). Teachers’ professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.010
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
• Nazaretsky, T., Bar, C., Walter, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Empowering teachers with AI: Co-designing a learning analytics tool for personalized instruction in the science classroom. In Proceedings of the 12^th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 1-12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506861
• OECD (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
• Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D. O., Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), Article em2307. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428
• Pozdniakov, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Singh, S., Khosravi, H., & Gašević, D. (2023). Using learning analytics to support teachers. In B. Du Boulay, A. Mitrovic, & K. Yacef, (Eds.), Handbook of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 322-349). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375413.00026
• Reif, F. (1995). Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes. American Journal of Physics, 63(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17764
• Reif, F. (2008). Applying cognitive science to education: Thinking and learning in scientific and other complex domains. MIT Press.
• Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1075
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1080-9724(99)80076-7
• Sezen-Barrie, A., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). From the teacher’s eyes: Facilitating teachers’ noticings on informal formative assessments (IFAs) and exploring the challenges to effective implementation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 181-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1274921
• Sherin, B., & Star, J. R. (2011). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66-78). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832714
• Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.) (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832714
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Smith, R., Shin, D., Kim, S., & Zawodniak, M. (2018). Novice secondary mathematics teachers’ evaluation of mathematical cognitive technological tools. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 606-630.
• Superfine, A., & Bragelman, J. (2018). Analyzing the impact of video representation complexity on preservice teacher noticing of children’s thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(11), Article em1650. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99501
• Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001). Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(2), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00293
• van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134-151). Routledge.
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
• Wan, T., & Chen, Z. (2024). Exploring generative AI assisted feedback writing for students’ written responses to a physics conceptual question with prompt engineering and few-shot learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20, Article 010152. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010152
• Weyers, J., König, J., Santagata, R., Scheiner, T., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Measuring teacher noticing: A scoping review of standardized instruments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, Article 103970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103970
• Wilson, C. D., Borowski, A., & van Driel, J. H. (2019). Perspectives on the future of PCK research in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge (pp. 289-300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_13
• Wulff, P., Buschhüter, D., Westphal, A., Mientus, L., Nowak, A., & Borowski, A. (2022). Bridging the gap between qualitative and quantitative assessment in science education research with machine learning—A case for pretrained language models-based clustering. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(4), 490-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09969-w
• Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M. (2016). How teachers use data to help students learn: Contextual inquiry for the design of a dashboard. In Proceedings of the 11^th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 340-354). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_26
• Yacobson, E., & Alexandron, G. (2024). Recommending is reflecting: A surprising benefit of social recommender systems for teachers. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 195-200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72312-4_27
• Yeo, S. (2023). Elementary preservice teachers’ noticing and evaluation of digital mathematical resources. Research in Mathematical Education, 26(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3173436/v1
• Yerushalmi, E., & Eylon, B. S. (2015). Problem solving in science learning. In Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 786-790). Weizmann Institute of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_129
• Yerushalmi, E., Henderson, C., Heller, K., Heller, P., & Kuo, V. (2007). Physics faculty beliefs and values about the teaching and learning of problem solving. I. Mapping the common core. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 3, Article 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020109
• Zhai, X. (2021). Practices and theories: How can machine learning assist in innovative assessment practices in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09901-8
• Zhang, J. H., Zhang, Y. X., Zou, Q., & Huang, S. (2018). What learning analytics tells us: Group behavior analysis and individual learning diagnosis based on long-term and large-scale data. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 245-258.
• Zhang, L., Basham, J. D., & Yang, S. (2020). Understanding the implementation of personalized learning: A research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, Article 100339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100339
• Zuo, S., Liu, L., & Qi, C. (2024). Using video to develop pre-service teachers’ noticing within a mathematical modelling context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), Article em2441. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14466

APA

Levy, S., Chen, E., Langley, D., Walter, M., Porat, G., Nazaretsky, T., Alexandron, G., & Yerushalmi, E. (2026). High school physics teachers' professional noticing in the context of group-oriented learning analytics dashboards. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(4), em2813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18256

Vancouver

Levy S, Chen E, Langley D, Walter M, Porat G, Nazaretsky T, et al. High school physics teachers' professional noticing in the context of group-oriented learning analytics dashboards. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(4):em2813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18256

AMA

Levy S, Chen E, Langley D, et al. High school physics teachers' professional noticing in the context of group-oriented learning analytics dashboards. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(4), em2813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18256

Chicago

Levy, Smadar, Eliran Chen, Dorothy Langley, Michal Walter, Gilit Porat, Tanya Nazaretsky, Giora Alexandron, and Edit Yerushalmi. "High school physics teachers' professional noticing in the context of group-oriented learning analytics dashboards". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 4 (2026): em2813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18256

Harvard

Levy, S., Chen, E., Langley, D., Walter, M., Porat, G., Nazaretsky, T., . . . Yerushalmi, E. (2026). High school physics teachers' professional noticing in the context of group-oriented learning analytics dashboards. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(4), em2813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18256

MLA

Levy, Smadar et al. "High school physics teachers' professional noticing in the context of group-oriented learning analytics dashboards". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 4, 2026, em2813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18256