• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does Practical Work Really Work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1945–1969.
• Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. (2003). Trial of the Five Es: A Referent Model for Constructivist Learning. Research in Science Education, 33, 27–42.
• Braund, M., & Driver, M. (2005). Pupils’ perceptions of practical science in primary and secondary school: implications for improving progression and continuity of learning. Educational Research, 47, 77–91.
• Groves, F. H., & Pugh, A. F. (2002). Cognitive Illusions as Hindrances to Learning Complex Environmental Issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 381– 390.
• Hammann, M., Thanh, T., Phan, H., Ehmer, M., & Grimm, T. (2008). Assessing pupils’ skills in experimentation. Journal of Biological Education, 42, 66–73.
• Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student's evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 55–87.
• Herbert, D. M. B., & Burt, J. S. (2003). What do students remember? Episodic memory and the development of schematization. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 77–88.
• Högström, P., Ottander, C., & Benckert, S. (2010). Lab Work and Learning in Secondary School Chemistry: The Importance of Teacher and Pupil Interaction. Research in Science Education, 40, 505-523.
• Ibabe, I., & Sporer, S. L. (2004). How you ask is what you get: on the influence of question form on accuracy and confidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 711–726.
• Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory; some thoughts from the literature. University Chemistry Education, 5, 42–51.
• Juriševič, M., Glažar, S. A., Pučko, C. R., & Devetak, I. (2008). Intrinsic Motivation of Pre-service Primary School Teachers for Learning Chemistry in Relation to their Academic Achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 87–107.
• Kalman, C. S. (2002). Developing Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Courses: A Philosophical Approach. Science & Education, 11, 83–94.
• Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34, 71–96.
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational psychologist, 41, 75–86.
• Klahr, D., & Li, J. (2005). Cognitive Research and Elementary Science Instruction: From the Laboratory, to the Classroom, and back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 217–238.
• Klassen, S. (2009). Identifying and Addressing Pupil Difficulties with the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment. Science & Education, 18, 593–607.
• Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94, 810–824.
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.
• Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42, 36–39.
• Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chuda, J. (2007). Slovakian students’ attitudes toward biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3, 287–295.
• Sampson, V. & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, Special Issue: Science Studies and Science Education, 92, 447–472.
• Tomažič, I. (2008) The influence of direct experience on pupils' attitudes to, and knowledge about amphibians. Acta Biologica Slovenica, 51, 39–49.
• Tomkins, S. P. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Looking for ideas: observation, interpretation and hypothesis-making by 12-year-old pupils undertaking science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 791–813.
• Wellington, J. (2005). Practical Work and the Affective Domain: What Do We Know, What Should We Ask, and What Is Worth Exploring Further? In S. Alsop (Ed.), Beyond Cartesian Dualism, Dordrecht, Springer. 99– 109).
• Welzel, M., Haller, K., Bandiera, M., Hammelev, D., Koumaras, P., Niedderer, H., Paulsen, A., Robinault, K., & von Aufschnaiter, S. (1998). Labwork In Science Education: Teachers’ Objectives For Labwork. Research Tool and Cross Country Results (Working Paper 6); Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme, Project PL 95-2005. Retrieved from http://www.physik.uni-bremen.de/physics.education/ niedderer/projects/labwork/wp6.pdf.

APA

Urbančič, M., & Glažar, S. A. (2012). Impact of Experiments on 13-year-old Pupils’ Understanding of Selected Science Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(3), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.836a

Vancouver

Urbančič M, Glažar SA. Impact of Experiments on 13-year-old Pupils’ Understanding of Selected Science Concepts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2012;8(3):207-18. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.836a

AMA

Urbančič M, Glažar SA. Impact of Experiments on 13-year-old Pupils’ Understanding of Selected Science Concepts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2012;8(3), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.836a

Chicago

Urbančič, Matej, and Saša A. Glažar. "Impact of Experiments on 13-year-old Pupils’ Understanding of Selected Science Concepts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2012 8 no. 3 (2012): 207-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.836a

Harvard

Urbančič, M., and Glažar, S. A. (2012). Impact of Experiments on 13-year-old Pupils’ Understanding of Selected Science Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(3), pp. 207-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.836a

MLA

Urbančič, Matej et al. "Impact of Experiments on 13-year-old Pupils’ Understanding of Selected Science Concepts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 8, no. 3, 2012, pp. 207-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.836a